3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Radiological Gastrostomy (PRG) as a Rescue Measure for Enteral Feeding in Patients with Advanced Head, Neck, and Upper Digestive Malignancies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background  Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy is an established mode of enteral feeding for nutritional support for patients with dysphagia from upper digestive tract malignancy. Its role as a rescue measure in patients with advanced malignancy, presenting with absolute dysphagia and failure of nasogastric tube insertion has not been well established.

          Purpose  This study was performed to assess technical success and long-term outcomes of percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (push type) for nutritional support for patients with absolute dysphagia as a last ditch nonsurgical rescue effort for enteral access.

          Materials and Methods  This was a prospective observational study of 31 patients who underwent push-type percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy over a period of 2 years (March 2017–March 2019). The study was a part of a larger trial approved by the institutional ethics committee. Patients were followed till the removal of tube, death, or 1 year, whichever was earlier. Gastrostomy tube-related problems and complications were documented. Descriptive summary statistics were employed to analyze the success rate and complications.

          Results  Thirty-one patients with mean age 56 years (26–78 years) including 18 males and 13 females with head and neck squamous cell cancer and esophageal cancer presenting with absolute dysphagia or significant dysphagia with failed nasogastric or endoscopic enteral access were included. Overall technical success was 93.5% (29/31), achieved in 26/31 patients with just fluoroscopy guidance and 3/5 patients with computed tomography guidance. One major (3.3%) and two minor (6.5%) complications were encountered. Five out of 29 gastrostomy tubes had to be exchanged, after a mean of 44 days (1–128 days) after insertion.

          Conclusion  Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy is a safe and effective intervention even as a rescue measure in patients with absolute dysphagia from advanced upper digestive tract malignancies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee

          To develop a new adverse event (AE) classification for the interventional radiology (IR) procedures and evaluate its clinical, research, and educational value compared with the existing Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification via an SIR member survey.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Practice guidelines for adult antibiotic prophylaxis during vascular and interventional radiology procedures. Written by the Standards of Practice Committee for the Society of Interventional Radiology and Endorsed by the Cardiovascular Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and Canadian Interventional Radiology Association [corrected].

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Enteral feeding methods for nutritional management in patients with head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.

              This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 3, 2010.For many patients with head and neck cancer, oral nutrition will not provide adequate nourishment during treatment with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy due to the acute toxicity of treatment, obstruction caused by the tumour, or both. The optimal method of enteral feeding for this patient group has yet to be established.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Radiol Imaging
                Indian J Radiol Imaging
                10.1055/s-00050590
                The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging
                Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India )
                0971-3026
                1998-3808
                31 October 2022
                December 2022
                1 October 2022
                : 32
                : 4
                : 471-478
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiology, Institute of Rotary Cancer Hospital (IRCH), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Delhi, India
                [2 ]Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Delhi, India
                [3 ]Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Delhi, India
                [4 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Delhi, India
                [5 ]Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Delhi, India
                [6 ]BRA-IRCH, Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Delhi, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Mukesh Kumar, MD Department of Radiology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi 110029, DelhiIndia Mukeshyadav11@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9326-271X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9942-3403
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4130-724X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-9494
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-4029
                Article
                IJRI-21-7-0692
                10.1055/s-0042-1750154
                9705132
                36451943
                bbf120a4-3450-4f72-b5cd-d96b119619ce
                Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Radiology & Imaging
                gastrostomy,head and neck cancer,esophageal cancer
                Radiology & Imaging
                gastrostomy, head and neck cancer, esophageal cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article