25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An in-depth psychometric analysis of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: calibration with Rasch-Andrich model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) is inarguably one of the best-known instruments in the field of resilience assessment. However, the criteria for the psychometric quality of the instrument were based only on classical test theory.

          Method

          The aim of this paper has focused on the calibration of the CD-RISC with a nonclinical sample of 444 adults using the Rasch-Andrich Rating Scale Model, in order to clarify its structure and analyze its psychometric properties at the level of item.

          Results

          Two items showed misfit to the model and were eliminated. The remaining 22 items form basically a unidimensional scale. The CD-RISC has good psychometric properties. The fit of both the items and the persons to the Rasch model was good, and the response categories were functioning properly. Two of the items showed differential item functioning.

          Conclusions

          The CD-RISC has an obvious ceiling effect, which suggests to include more difficult items in future versions of the scale.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).

          Resilience may be viewed as a measure of stress coping ability and, as such, could be an important target of treatment in anxiety, depression, and stress reactions. We describe a new rating scale to assess resilience. The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) comprises of 25 items, each rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), with higher scores reflecting greater resilience. The scale was administered to subjects in the following groups: community sample, primary care outpatients, general psychiatric outpatients, clinical trial of generalized anxiety disorder, and two clinical trials of PTSD. The reliability, validity, and factor analytic structure of the scale were evaluated, and reference scores for study samples were calculated. Sensitivity to treatment effects was examined in subjects from the PTSD clinical trials. The scale demonstrated good psychometric properties and factor analysis yielded five factors. A repeated measures ANOVA showed that an increase in CD-RISC score was associated with greater improvement during treatment. Improvement in CD-RISC score was noted in proportion to overall clinical global improvement, with greatest increase noted in subjects with the highest global improvement and deterioration in CD-RISC score in those with minimal or no global improvement. The CD-RISC has sound psychometric properties and distinguishes between those with greater and lesser resilience. The scale demonstrates that resilience is modifiable and can improve with treatment, with greater improvement corresponding to higher levels of global improvement. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                viarias@utalca.cl
                crespomt@psi.uva.es
                barias@psi.uva.es
                agmartinez@utalca.cl
                fponce@utalca.cl
                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7525
                23 September 2015
                23 September 2015
                2015
                : 13
                : 154
                Affiliations
                [ ]Facultad de Psicología [School of Psychology], Universidad de Talca [University of Talca], 2 norte 685, Av. Lircay s/n, Talca, Chile
                [ ]Facultad de Educación y Trabajo Social [School of Education and Social Work], Universidad de Valladolid [University of Valladolid], Av. De Belén s/n, Valladolid, España
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1260-7948
                Article
                345
                10.1186/s12955-015-0345-y
                4580216
                26395870
                bb8c8b7c-8c25-4f2f-81b3-6ee9831bd241
                © Arias González et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 3 January 2015
                : 10 September 2015
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article