6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Punitive Reactions to Tax Evasion in Italy : The Moderating Role of Economic System Justification

      research-article
      1 , * , , 1
      Zeitschrift für Psychologie
      Hogrefe Publishing
      tax evasion, punishment, system justification

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. The present research investigates whether and how intentionality of (i.e., a retribution-related factor) and the difficulty to detect (i.e., a utilitarianism-related factor) tax evasion may influence people’s punitive reactions depending on individual differences in economic system justification. Results of a moderation analysis revealed (a) a positive effect of intentionality, but not difficult to detect, on punitiveness; (b) a negative effect of economic system justification on punitiveness; (c) an interactive effect between intentionality and economic system justification, suggesting that intentionality predicts punitive reactions towards tax evaders only when economic system justification is low. These results qualify the notion that people are more concerned about retribution than about utilitarianism, thereby providing support for the intuitive retributivism hypothesis. Also, they suggest that economic system justification plays a role in demotivating punishment toward tax evaders, especially in conjunction with retribution.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The psychology of legitimacy: a relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities.

              People within organized groups often internalize their feelings of obligation to obey group rules and the decisions of group authorities. They believe that group authorities and rules are legitimate and, hence, entitled to be obeyed. Because of this belief, group members voluntarily accept and obey rules and decisions from group authorities. This review draws on evidence from studies of authorities in political, legal, managerial, educational, and family settings to explore why people view as legitimate and voluntarily defer to group authorities. Two theories about legitimacy are contrasted: resource-based theories, represented by instrumental models, and identification-based theories, represented by the relational model. The findings provide strong support for the existence of a relational component of legitimacy, suggesting that authorities draw an important part of their legitimacy from their social relationship with group members. The findings also show that there is an instrumental component to legitimacy. Hence, the psychology of legitimacy involves both instrumental and relational elements.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                zfp
                Zeitschrift für Psychologie
                Hogrefe Publishing
                2190-8370
                2151-2604
                February 25, 2022
                April 2022
                : 230
                : 2 , Topical Issue: The Motivational Basis of Punishment: Conceptual Replications of the “Intuitive Retributivism” Hypothesis
                : 94-103
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
                Author notes
                Valeria De Cristofaro, Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Roma, Italy valeria.decristofaro@ 123456uniroma1.it
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4904-785X
                Article
                zfp_230_2_94
                10.1027/2151-2604/a000456
                bb8258cd-723f-411b-92c4-eb94a5e472a9
                Copyright @ 2022
                History
                : March 30, 2020
                : March 27, 2021
                : April 23, 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                Psychology,General behavioral science
                tax evasion,system justification,punishment
                Psychology, General behavioral science
                tax evasion, system justification, punishment

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content351

                Cited by1

                Most referenced authors184