9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Corowa-kun: A messenger app chatbot delivers COVID-19 vaccine information, Japan 2021

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is a long history in Japan of public concerns about vaccine adverse events. Few studies have assessed how mobile messenger apps affect COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

          Methods

          Corowa-kun, a free chatbot, was created on February 6, 2021 in LINE, the most popular messenger app in Japan. Corowa-kun provides instant, automated answers to 70 frequently asked COVID-19 vaccine questions. A cross-sectional survey with 21 questions was performed within Corowa-kun during April 5–12, 2021.

          Results

          A total of 59,676 persons used Corowa-kun during February–April 2021. Of them, 10,192 users (17%) participated in the survey. Median age was 55 years (range 16–97), and most were female (74%). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy reported by survey respondents decreased from 41% to 20% after using Corowa-kun. Of the 20% who remained hesitant, 16% (1,675) were unsure, and 4% (364) did not intend to be vaccinated. Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy were: age 16−34 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7; 95% confidential interval [CI]: 3.0–4.6, compared to age ≥65), female sex (OR = 2.4; Cl: 2.1–2.8), and history of a previous vaccine side-effect (OR = 2.5; Cl: 2.2–2.9). Being a physician (OR = 0.2; Cl: 0.1−0.4) and having received a flu vaccine the prior season (OR = 0.4; Cl: 0.3–0.4) were protective.

          Conclusions

          A substantial number of people used the chabot in a short period. Mobile messenger apps could be leveraged to provide accurate vaccine information and to investigate vaccine intention and risk factors for vaccine hesitancy.

          Text (2874 of 3500)

          Background

          In 2020, a global coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic emerged, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. [1] According to the World Health Organization, there have been 516 million confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 6 million deaths (as of May 11, 2022). [2] Multiple COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective at preventing symptomatic disease. [3] Most developed countries have already vaccinated large proportions of their populations. However, many individuals choose not to be vaccinated, often citing safety concerns. Early in the pandemic, studies revealed high levels of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, ranging from 20−40% of the surveyed populations. [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] Vaccine hesitancy differs depending on sociodemographic factors, such as race and educational level, as well as attitudes and beliefs. [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] Understanding peoples’ concerns about COVID-19 vaccines is necessary to increase vaccine uptake among those hesitant.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019

          Summary In December 2019, a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unknown cause was linked to a seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, China. A previously unknown betacoronavirus was discovered through the use of unbiased sequencing in samples from patients with pneumonia. Human airway epithelial cells were used to isolate a novel coronavirus, named 2019-nCoV, which formed a clade within the subgenus sarbecovirus, Orthocoronavirinae subfamily. Different from both MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, 2019-nCoV is the seventh member of the family of coronaviruses that infect humans. Enhanced surveillance and further investigation are ongoing. (Funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China and the National Major Project for Control and Prevention of Infectious Disease in China.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

            Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine

              Several coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are currently in human trials. In June 2020, we surveyed 13,426 people in 19 countries to determine potential acceptance rates and factors influencing acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Of these, 71.5% of participants reported that they would be very or somewhat likely to take a COVID-19 vaccine, and 61.4% reported that they would accept their employer’s recommendation to do so. Differences in acceptance rates ranged from almost 90% (in China) to less than 55% (in Russia). Respondents reporting higher levels of trust in information from government sources were more likely to accept a vaccine and take their employer’s advice to do so.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                0264-410X
                1873-2518
                8 June 2022
                8 June 2022
                Affiliations
                [a ]Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
                [b ]Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
                [c ]MSc Public Health (c), Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK
                [d ]Department of General Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Okayama, Japan
                [e ]Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
                [f ]Department of Pediatrics, Jikei University Katsushika Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
                [g ]Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
                [h ]Department of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Moroyama, Saitama, Japan
                [i ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kanto Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
                [j ]Department of Oncology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan
                [k ]Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
                [l ]Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author.
                Article
                S0264-410X(22)00754-X
                10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.06.007
                9174339
                35750541
                bb5e8271-71b3-42f1-a150-0eac6a70a359
                © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 9 August 2021
                : 22 May 2022
                : 2 June 2022
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article