3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adjuvant 5‐fluorouracil and portal vein infusion chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy improves the overall survival (OS) of patients with resected pancreatic cancer, its efficacy requires further improvement. This multicenter, phase II study investigated the efficacy of adjuvant portal vein infusion (PVI) chemotherapy followed by GEM therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

          Methods

          5‐fluorouracil (250 mg/day) and heparin (2000 IU/day) PVI chemotherapy were combined with systemic administration of mitomycin C (4 mg; days 6, 13, 20, and 27) and cisplatin (10 mg; days 7, 14, 21, and 28) for 4 weeks (PI4W), followed by GEM (1000 mg/m2; days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for 6 months). The primary endpoint was relapse‐free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoints were OS and treatment completion.

          Results

          Between November 2010 and August 2013, 53 patients who underwent complete resection were enrolled, including 30, 20, and 3 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies and distal and total pancreatectomies, respectively. In total, 51 (96.2%) patients underwent R0 resection, of whom 3, 2, 12, 35, 0, and 1 had stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III, and IV cancer, respectively, and 47 (88.7%) patients completed PI4W. The median RFS was 22.0 months (1‐, 3‐, 5, and 10 years RFS: 64.9%, 38.1%, 38.1%, and 38.1%, respectively), whereas the median OS was 32.0 months (1‐, 3‐, 5, and 10 years OS:86.6%, 47.2%, 44.4%, and 44.4%, respectively).

          Conclusion

          Treatment with PI4W followed by GEM for 6 months after surgery may be beneficial in patients undergoing curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

          Abstract

          Between November 2010 and August 2013, 53 patients who underwent complete resection were enrolled. The median RFS was 22.0 months, whereas the median OS was 32.0 months. Treatment with PI4W followed by gemcitabine for 6 months after surgery may be beneficial in patients undergoing curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Cancer statistics, 2022

          Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence and outcomes. Incidence data (through 2018) were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data (through 2019) were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2022, 1,918,030 new cancer cases and 609,360 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States, including approximately 350 deaths per day from lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer death. Incidence during 2014 through 2018 continued a slow increase for female breast cancer (by 0.5% annually) and remained stable for prostate cancer, despite a 4% to 6% annual increase for advanced disease since 2011. Consequently, the proportion of prostate cancer diagnosed at a distant stage increased from 3.9% to 8.2% over the past decade. In contrast, lung cancer incidence continued to decline steeply for advanced disease while rates for localized-stage increased suddenly by 4.5% annually, contributing to gains both in the proportion of localized-stage diagnoses (from 17% in 2004 to 28% in 2018) and 3-year relative survival (from 21% to 31%). Mortality patterns reflect incidence trends, with declines accelerating for lung cancer, slowing for breast cancer, and stabilizing for prostate cancer. In summary, progress has stagnated for breast and prostate cancers but strengthened for lung cancer, coinciding with changes in medical practice related to cancer screening and/or treatment. More targeted cancer control interventions and investment in improved early detection and treatment would facilitate reductions in cancer mortality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

            Although quality assessment is gaining increasing attention, there is still no consensus on how to define and grade postoperative complications. This shortcoming hampers comparison of outcome data among different centers and therapies and over time. A classification of complications published by one of the authors in 1992 was critically re-evaluated and modified to increase its accuracy and its acceptability in the surgical community. Modifications mainly focused on the manner of reporting life-threatening and permanently disabling complications. The new grading system still mostly relies on the therapy used to treat the complication. The classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients who underwent elective general surgery at our institution. The reproducibility and personal judgment of the classification were evaluated through an international survey with 2 questionnaires sent to 10 surgical centers worldwide. The new ranking system significantly correlated with complexity of surgery (P < 0.0001) as well as with the length of the hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A total of 144 surgeons from 10 different centers around the world and at different levels of training returned the survey. Ninety percent of the case presentations were correctly graded. The classification was considered to be simple (92% of the respondents), reproducible (91%), logical (92%), useful (90%), and comprehensive (89%). The answers of both questionnaires were not dependent on the origin of the reply and the level of training of the surgeons. The new complication classification appears reliable and may represent a compelling tool for quality assessment in surgery in all parts of the world.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging.

              The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual has become the benchmark for classifying patients with cancer, defining prognosis, and determining the best treatment approaches. Many view the primary role of the tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) system as that of a standardized classification system for evaluating cancer at a population level in terms of the extent of disease, both at initial presentation and after surgical treatment, and the overall impact of improvements in cancer treatment. The rapid evolution of knowledge in cancer biology and the discovery and validation of biologic factors that predict cancer outcome and response to treatment with better accuracy have led some cancer experts to question the utility of a TNM-based approach in clinical care at an individualized patient level. In the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, the goal of including relevant, nonanatomic (including molecular) factors has been foremost, although changes are made only when there is strong evidence for inclusion. The editorial board viewed this iteration as a proactive effort to continue to build the important bridge from a "population-based" to a more "personalized" approach to patient classification, one that forms the conceptual framework and foundation of cancer staging in the era of precision molecular oncology. The AJCC promulgates best staging practices through each new edition in an effort to provide cancer care providers with a powerful, knowledge-based resource for the battle against cancer. In this commentary, the authors highlight the overall organizational and structural changes as well as "what's new" in the Eighth Edition. It is hoped that this information will provide the reader with a better understanding of the rationale behind the aggregate proposed changes and the exciting developments in the upcoming edition. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:93-99. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dragonpegasus@keio.jp
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                19 July 2024
                July 2024
                : 13
                : 14 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.v13.14 )
                : e7459
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Surgery Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
                [ 2 ] Department of Surgery Kawasaki Municipal Hospital Kawasaki Japan
                [ 3 ] Department of Surgery Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital Tochigi Japan
                [ 4 ] Department of Surgery Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital Chiba Japan
                [ 5 ] Department of Surgery Tachikawa Kyosai Hospital Tokyo Japan
                [ 6 ] Department of Surgery Kitasato Institute Hospital Tokyo Japan
                [ 7 ] Department of Surgery Isehara Kyodo Hospital Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan
                [ 8 ] Digestive Diseases Center International University of Health and Welfare, Mita Hospital Tokyo Japan
                [ 9 ] Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic & Gastrointestinal Surgery International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine Chiba Japan
                [ 10 ] Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tokyo Japan
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Minoru Kitago, Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku‐ku, Tokyo 160‐8582, Japan.

                Email: dragonpegasus@ 123456keio.jp

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7187-0124
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-3474
                Article
                CAM47459 CAM4-2024-03-1315.R1
                10.1002/cam4.7459
                11258433
                39030993
                bb309bdd-444a-41a2-9717-def7daba79bb
                © 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 April 2024
                : 04 March 2024
                : 24 June 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 10, Words: 6100
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.5 mode:remove_FC converted:19.07.2024

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                adjuvant chemotherapy,gemcitabine,pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,resected pancreatic cancer,survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article