16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Internal consistency of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Amazonian children

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          OBJECTIVE

          To describe the frequency of behavioral problems and the internal consistency of the parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-P) in Amazonian preschool children during the covid-19 pandemic.

          METHODS

          Data from the Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition in Acre (MINA-Brazil) study, a population-based birth cohort in the Western Brazilian Amazon, were used. The SDQ-P was applied in 2021 at the five-year follow-up visit to parents or caregivers of 695 children (49.4% of which were girls). This instrument is a short behavioral screening questionnaire composed of 25 items reorganized into five subscales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior. Cases of behavioral problems were defined according to the original SDQ cut-offs based on United Kingdom norms. Moreover, cut off points were estimated based on the SDQ-P percentile results of our study sample. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient and McDonald's omega for each scale.

          RESULTS

          According to the cut-offs based on our studied population distribution, 10% of all children had high or very high total difficulty scores, whereas it was almost twice when the original SDQ cut-offs based on United Kingdom norms, were applied (18%). Differences were also observed in the other scales. Compared to girls, boys showed higher means of externalizing problem and lower means of prosocial behavior. The five-factor model showed a moderate internal consistency of the items for all scales (0.60 ≤ α ≤ 0.40), except for total difficulty scores, which it considered substantial (α > 0.61).

          CONCLUSIONS

          Our results support the usefulness of SDQ in our study population and reinforce the need for strategies and policy development for mental health care in early life in the Amazon.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents

          OBJECTIVE: To construct growth curves for school-aged children and adolescents that accord with the WHO Child Growth Standards for preschool children and the body mass index (BMI) cut-offs for adults. METHODS: Data from the 1977 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)/WHO growth reference (1-24 years) were merged with data from the under-fives growth standards' cross-sectional sample (18-71 months) to smooth the transition between the two samples. State-of-the-art statistical methods used to construct the WHO Child Growth Standards (0-5 years), i.e. the Box-Cox power exponential (BCPE) method with appropriate diagnostic tools for the selection of best models, were applied to this combined sample. FINDINGS: The merged data sets resulted in a smooth transition at 5 years for height-for-age, weight-for-age and BMI-for-age. For BMI-for-age across all centiles the magnitude of the difference between the two curves at age 5 years is mostly 0.0 kg/m² to 0.1 kg/m². At 19 years, the new BMI values at +1 standard deviation (SD) are 25.4 kg/m² for boys and 25.0 kg/m² for girls. These values are equivalent to the overweight cut-off for adults (> 25.0 kg/m²). Similarly, the +2 SD value (29.7 kg/m² for both sexes) compares closely with the cut-off for obesity (> 30.0 kg/m²). CONCLUSION: The new curves are closely aligned with the WHO Child Growth Standards at 5 years, and the recommended adult cut-offs for overweight and obesity at 19 years. They fill the gap in growth curves and provide an appropriate reference for the 5 to 19 years age group.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee.

            Anthropometry provides the single most portable, universally applicable, inexpensive and non-invasive technique for assessing the size, proportions, and composition of the human body. It reflects both health and nutritional status and predicts performance, health, and survival. As such, it is a valuable, but currently underused, tool for guiding public health policy and clinical decisions. This report presents the conclusions and comprehensive recommendations of a WHO Expert Committee for the present and future uses and interpretation of anthropometry. In a section that sets the technical framework for the report, the significance of anthropometric indicators and indices is explained and the principles of applied biostatistics and epidemiology that underlie their various uses are discussed. Subsequent sections provide detailed guidance on the use and interpretation of anthropometric measurements in pregnant and lactating women, newborn infants, infants and children, adolescents, overweight and thin adults, and adults aged 60 years and over. With a similar format for each section, the report assesses specific applications of anthropometry in individuals and populations for purposes of screening and for targeting and evaluating interventions. Advice on data management and analysis is offered, and methods of taking particular measurements are described. Each section also includes a discussion of the extent, reliability and universal relevance of existing reference data. An extensive series of reference data recommended by the Expert Committee and not widely distributed by WHO hitherto is included in an annex.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.

              R. Goodman (1997)
              A novel behavioural screening questionnaire, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), was administered along with Rutter questionnaires to parents and teachers of 403 children drawn from dental and psychiatric clinics. Scores derived from the SDQ and Rutter questionnaires were highly correlated; parent-teacher correlations for the two sets of measures were comparable or favoured the SDQ. The two sets of measures did not differ in their ability to discriminate between psychiatric and dental clinic attenders. These preliminary findings suggest that the SDQ functions as well as the Rutter questionnaires while offering the following additional advantages: a focus on strengths as well as difficulties; better coverage of inattention, peer relationships, and prosocial behaviour; a shorter format; and a single form suitable for both parents and teachers, perhaps thereby increasing parent-teacher correlations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Study design and planningRole: Data collectionRole: analysisRole: interpretationRole: Manuscript drafting or reviewRole: Approval of the final versionRole: Public responsibility for the content of the article
                Role: Study design and planningRole: Data collectionRole: analysisRole: interpretationRole: Manuscript drafting or reviewRole: Approval of the final versionRole: Public responsibility for the content of the article
                Role: Study design and planningRole: Data collectionRole: analysisRole: interpretationRole: Manuscript drafting or reviewRole: Approval of the final versionRole: Public responsibility for the content of the article
                Role: Study design and planningRole: Data collectionRole: analysisRole: interpretationRole: Manuscript drafting or reviewRole: Approval of the final versionRole: Public responsibility for the content of the article
                Journal
                Rev Saude Publica
                Rev Saude Publica
                rsp
                Revista de Saúde Pública
                Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
                0034-8910
                1518-8787
                01 February 2024
                2023
                : 57
                : Suppl 2
                : 4s
                Affiliations
                [I ] orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Faculdade de Saúde Pública São Paulo SP Brasil originalUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Nutrição em Saúde Pública. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
                [II ] orgnameUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa orgdiv1Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical Lisboa Portugal originalUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa. Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Saúde Global e Medicina Tropical. Lisboa, Portugal
                [III ] orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Faculdade de Medicina orgdiv2Departamento de Medicina Preventiva São Paulo SP Brasil originalUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
                [IV ] orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Faculdade de Saúde Pública orgdiv2Departamento de Nutrição São Paulo SP Brasil originalUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Nutrição. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
                [I ] São Paulo SP Brasil originalUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Nutrição em Saúde Pública. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
                [II ] Lisboa Portugal originalUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa. Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Saúde Global e Medicina Tropical. Lisboa, Portugal
                [III ] São Paulo SP Brasil originalUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
                [IV ] São Paulo SP Brasil originalUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Nutrição. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Marly A. Cardoso Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Saúde Pública Departamento de Nutrição Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715 01246-904 São Paulo, SP, Brasil E-mail: marlyac@ 123456usp.br

                Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

                Correspondência: Marly A. Cardoso Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Saúde Pública Departamento de Nutrição Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715 01246-904 São Paulo, SP, Brasil E-mail: marlyac@ 123456usp.br

                Conflito de Interesses: Os autores declaram não haver conflitos de interesse.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3460-7196
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7941-0285
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0060-1589
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0973-3908
                Article
                00202
                10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005562
                10897965
                bb133222-4bfc-443d-a36c-eee603878985

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 May 2023
                : 02 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 8, Equations: 0, References: 30
                Funding
                Funded by: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
                Award ID: 407255/2013-3
                Award ID: 303794/2021-6
                Award ID: 312746/2021-0
                Funded by: São Paulo Research Foundation
                Award ID: 2016/00270-6
                Award ID: 2022/03400-9
                Award ID: 2021/01688-2
                Categories
                Original Article

                psychometrics,problem behavior,child behavior disorders,behavior rating scale

                Comments

                Comment on this article