19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reduced-Dose Radiation Therapy for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma (NRG Oncology HN002)

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , PhD 2 , , MD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD 5 , , PhD 6 , , MD 7 , , MD 8 , , PhD 1 , , MD 9 , , MD 10 , , MD 3 , , MD 6 , , MD 1 , , MD 4 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD 13 , , MD 14 , , MD 15 , , MD 16 , , MD 17
      Journal of Clinical Oncology
      Wolters Kluwer Health
      261-137-3222-3996-2348, Intensity modulated radiotherapy, 55, 283-147-7027-9452, Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, 13, 261-137-3222-3996-2348, Intensity modulated radiotherapy, 12, 261-137-440, Chemoradiotherapy, 11, 613-3267-3990-2832, HPV infection, 9, 298-145-222-184-1022-9126, Phase III trials, 8, 261-492-574, Mortality, 8, 261-492-3532-2370-7646-2344, Hazard ratio, 6, 130-274, Quality of life, 3, 283-147-7027-9452, Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, 3, 298-145-222-184-1022-9126, Phase III trials, 2, 261-137-440, Chemoradiotherapy, 2, 62, cisplatin, 26, 53, dexamethasone, 9, 62, cisplatin, 1, 78, paclitaxel, 1, 14, nivolumab, 1, 126, cetuximab, 1, 295, carboplatin, 1, 38092-19641, CALR, 2

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          PURPOSE

          Reducing radiation treatment dose could improve the quality of life (QOL) of patients with good-risk human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Whether reduced-dose radiation produces disease control and QOL equivalent to standard chemoradiation is not proven.

          PATIENTS AND METHODS

          In this randomized, phase II trial, patients with p16-positive, T1-T2 N1-N2b M0, or T3 N0-N2b M0 OPSCC (7th edition staging) with ≤ 10 pack-years of smoking received 60 Gy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) over 6 weeks with concurrent weekly cisplatin (C) or 60 Gy IMRT over 5 weeks. To be considered for a phase III study, an arm had to achieve a 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate superior to a historical control rate of 85% and a 1-year mean composite score ≥ 60 on the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI).

          RESULTS

          Three hundred six patients were randomly assigned and eligible. Two-year PFS for IMRT + C was 90.5% rejecting the null hypothesis of 2-year PFS ≤ 85% ( P = .04). For IMRT, 2-year PFS was 87.6% ( P = .23). One-year MDADI mean scores were 85.30 and 81.76 for IMRT + C and IMRT, respectively. Two-year overall survival rates were 96.7% for IMRT + C and 97.3% for IMRT. Acute adverse events (AEs) were defined as those occurring within 180 days from the end of treatment. There were more grade 3-4 acute AEs for IMRT + C (79.6% v 52.4%; P < .001). Rates of grade 3-4 late AEs were 21.3% and 18.1% ( P = .56).

          CONCLUSION

          The IMRT + C arm met both prespecified end points justifying advancement to a phase III study. Higher rates of grade ≥ 3 acute AEs were reported in the IMRT + C arm.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

          Oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinomas caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) are associated with favorable survival, but the independent prognostic significance of tumor HPV status remains unknown. We performed a retrospective analysis of the association between tumor HPV status and survival among patients with stage III or IV oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma who were enrolled in a randomized trial comparing accelerated-fractionation radiotherapy (with acceleration by means of concomitant boost radiotherapy) with standard-fractionation radiotherapy, each combined with cisplatin therapy, in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Proportional-hazards models were used to compare the risk of death among patients with HPV-positive cancer and those with HPV-negative cancer. The median follow-up period was 4.8 years. The 3-year rate of overall survival was similar in the group receiving accelerated-fractionation radiotherapy and the group receiving standard-fractionation radiotherapy (70.3% vs. 64.3%; P=0.18; hazard ratio for death with accelerated-fractionation radiotherapy, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 1.13), as were the rates of high-grade acute and late toxic events. A total of 63.8% of patients with oropharyngeal cancer (206 of 323) had HPV-positive tumors; these patients had better 3-year rates of overall survival (82.4%, vs. 57.1% among patients with HPV-negative tumors; P<0.001 by the log-rank test) and, after adjustment for age, race, tumor and nodal stage, tobacco exposure, and treatment assignment, had a 58% reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66). The risk of death significantly increased with each additional pack-year of tobacco smoking. Using recursive-partitioning analysis, we classified our patients as having a low, intermediate, or high risk of death on the basis of four factors: HPV status, pack-years of tobacco smoking, tumor stage, and nodal stage. Tumor HPV status is a strong and independent prognostic factor for survival among patients with oropharyngeal cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047008.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Human Papillomavirus and Rising Oropharyngeal Cancer Incidence in the United States

            Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(32), 4294-4301
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial

              Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have high survival when treated with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Whether replacement of cisplatin with cetuximab-an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor-can preserve high survival and reduce treatment toxicity is unknown. We investigated whether cetuximab would maintain a high proportion of patient survival and reduce acute and late toxicity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Oncol
                J Clin Oncol
                jco
                jco
                JCO
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                20 March 2021
                28 January 2021
                : 39
                : 9
                : 956-965
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
                [ 2 ]NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
                [ 3 ]Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
                [ 4 ]University Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
                [ 5 ]M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
                [ 6 ]Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
                [ 7 ]Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
                [ 8 ]Stanford Cancer Institute Palo Alto, Stanford, CA
                [ 9 ]Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand
                [ 10 ]University Hospitals Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
                [ 11 ]The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
                [ 12 ]UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
                [ 13 ]Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
                [ 14 ]Sutter Cancer Research Consortium, Sacramento, CA
                [ 15 ]Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
                [ 16 ]University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS
                [ 17 ]Stanford University, Stanford, CA
                Author notes
                Sue S. Yom, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, 1825 4th Street, Suite L1101, San Francisco, CA 94158; e-mail: sue.yom@ 123456ucsf.edu .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-7476
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7462-1318
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5199-4306
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3152-1023
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8887-843X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2277-6080
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-5636
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3682-1439
                Article
                JCO.20.03128
                10.1200/JCO.20.03128
                8078254
                33507809
                babbf8f2-212f-48f3-a758-df846d2f86ad
                © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

                Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 20 October 2020
                : 25 November 2020
                : 4 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 11, Equations: 0, References: 42, Pages: 0
                Categories
                ORIGINAL REPORTS
                Head and Neck Cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content316

                Cited by97

                Most referenced authors1,347