For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
16
views
Article has an altmetric score of 66
59
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      199
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The CJEU Database Platform: Decisions and Decision-Makers

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article presents the CJEU Database Platform, which provides scholars with an extensive collection of easily accessible, research-ready data on the the universe of cases, decisions, and judges at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The CJEU Database Platform provides a foundation for the broader CJEU Database currently being developed by The IUROPA Project, a multidisciplinary group of scholars researching judicial politics in the European Union (EU). In this article, we illustrate how the CJEU Database Platform opens the door to new areas of theoretical and empirical research on judicial politics in the EU.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999

          Andrew D. Martin, Kevin M. Quinn (2002)
          At the heart of attitudinal and strategic explanations of judicial behavior is the assumption that justices have policy preferences. In this paper we employ Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to fit a Bayesian measurement model of ideal points for all justices serving on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1953 through 1999. We are particularly interested in determining to what extent ideal points of justices change throughout their tenure on the Court. This is important because judicial politics scholars oftentimes invoke preference measures that are time invariant. To investigate preference change, we posit a dynamic item response model that allows ideal points to change systematically over time. Additionally, we introduce Bayesian methods for fitting multivariate dynamic linear models to political scientists. Our results suggest that many justices do not have temporally constant ideal points. Moreover, our ideal point estimates outperform existing measures and explain judicial behavior quite well across civil rights, civil liberties, economics, and federalism cases.
          Article 0 comments Cited 149 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
          Article has an altmetric score of 6
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Transformation of Europe

            J. H. H. Weiler (1991)
            Article 0 comments Cited 110 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Article has an altmetric score of 21
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              The Judicial Construction of Europe

              Alec Stone Sweet (2004)
              Book 0 comments Cited 63 times – based on 0 reviews
              Article has an altmetric score of 4
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Stein Arne Brekke: (View ORCID Profile)
                Joshua C. Fjelstul: (View ORCID Profile)
                Silje Synnøve Lyder Hermansen: (View ORCID Profile)
                Daniel Naurin: (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Title: Journal of Law and Courts
                Abbreviated Title: J. law courts
                Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                ISSN (Print): 2164-6570
                ISSN (Electronic): 2164-6589
                Publication date (Electronic): January 30 2023
                Pages: 1-22
                Article
                DOI: 10.1017/jlc.2022.3
                SO-VID: ba61af8c-2b2b-4e23-b40b-4d0951410144
                Copyright © © 2023
                License:

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content199

                See all similar

                Most referenced authors151

                See all reference authors