10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk-averse personalities have a systemically potentiated neuroendocrine stress axis: A multilevel experiment in Parus major

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hormonal pleiotropy—the simultaneous influence of a single hormone on multiple traits—has been hypothesized as an important mechanism underlying personality, and circulating glucocorticoids are central to this idea. A major gap in our understanding is the neural basis for this link. Here we examine the stability and structure of behavioral, endocrine and neuroendocrine traits in a population of songbirds ( Parus major). Upon identifying stable and covarying behavioral and endocrine traits, we test the hypothesis that risk-averse personalities exhibit a neuroendocrine stress axis that is systemically potentiated—characterized by stronger glucocorticoid reactivity and weaker negative feedback. We show high among-individual variation and covariation (i.e. personality) in risk-taking behaviors and demonstrate that four aspects of glucocorticoid physiology (baseline, stress response, negative feedback strength and adrenal sensitivity) are also repeatable and covary. Further, we establish that high expression of mineralocorticoid and low expression of glucocorticoid receptor in the brain are linked with systemically elevated plasma glucocorticoid levels and more risk-averse personalities. Our findings support the hypothesis that steroid hormones can exert pleiotropic effects that organize behavioral phenotypes and provide novel evidence that neuroendocrine factors robustly explain a large fraction of endocrine and personality variation.

          Highlights

          • Hormonal pleiotropy is proposed as a mechanism for animal personality.

          • We repeatedly measured behavior, CORT dynamics and neural MR/GR densities.

          • MR/GR densities predict CORT dynamics and together predict behavioral variation.

          • Birds with lower GR and more potentiated HPA dynamics were more risk averse.

          • Stable and covarying behavioral and endocrine traits support hormonal pleiotropy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Unrepeatable Repeatabilities: A Common Mistake

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology.

            This paper summarizes the current views on coping styles as a useful concept in understanding individual adaptive capacity and vulnerability to stress-related disease. Studies in feral populations indicate the existence of a proactive and a reactive coping style. These coping styles seem to play a role in the population ecology of the species. Despite domestication, genetic selection and inbreeding, the same coping styles can, to some extent, also be observed in laboratory and farm animals. Coping styles are characterized by consistent behavioral and neuroendocrine characteristics, some of which seem to be causally linked to each other. Evidence is accumulating that the two coping styles might explain a differential vulnerability to stress mediated disease due to the differential adaptive value of the two coping styles and the accompanying neuroendocrine differentiation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept.

              With the steadily increasing number of publications in the field of stress research it has become evident that the conventional usage of the stress concept bears considerable problems. The use of the term 'stress' to conditions ranging from even the mildest challenging stimulation to severely aversive conditions, is in our view inappropriate. Review of the literature reveals that the physiological 'stress' response to appetitive, rewarding stimuli that are often not considered to be stressors can be as large as the response to negative stimuli. Analysis of the physiological response during exercise supports the view that the magnitude of the neuroendocrine response reflects the metabolic and physiological demands required for behavioural activity. We propose that the term 'stress' should be restricted to conditions where an environmental demand exceeds the natural regulatory capacity of an organism, in particular situations that include unpredictability and uncontrollability. Physiologically, stress seems to be characterized by either the absence of an anticipatory response (unpredictable) or a reduced recovery (uncontrollable) of the neuroendocrine reaction. The consequences of this restricted definition for stress research and the interpretation of results in terms of the adaptive and/or maladaptive nature of the response are discussed. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Horm Behav
                Horm Behav
                Hormones and Behavior
                Academic Press
                0018-506X
                1095-6867
                1 July 2017
                July 2017
                : 93
                : 99-108
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Biology, 500 College Avenue, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19081, USA
                [b ]Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, SL5 7PY, Ascot, Berks, United Kingdom
                [c ]The Roslin Institute, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, United Kingdom
                [d ]Department of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [e ]Evolutionary Physiology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Eberhard-Gwinner-Str., 82319 Seewiesen, Germany
                [f ]Department of Biology, Universitätsstrasse 10, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Swarthmore College, 500 College Avenue, Martin Biological Laboratory, Swarthmore, PA 19081, USA.Swarthmore CollegeMartin Biological Laboratory500 College AvenueSwarthmorePA19081USA abaugh1@ 123456swarthmore.edu
                Article
                S0018-506X(17)30029-6
                10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.05.011
                5552616
                28545898
                b9ae4acf-1bdb-4533-8deb-a2a678e55b21
                © 2017 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 25 January 2017
                : 30 March 2017
                : 20 May 2017
                Categories
                Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                acth,behavioral syndromes,corticosterone,dexamethasone,glucocorticoid receptor,hpa axis,mineralocorticoid receptor,negative feedback,personality,stress

                Comments

                Comment on this article