2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sex Differences in Stroke Care and Outcome 2005–2018 : Observations From the Swedish Stroke Register

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , on behalf of the Riksstroke Collaboration
      Stroke
      Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Purpose:

          Previous studies of stroke management and outcome in Sweden have revealed differences between men and women. We aimed to analyze if differences in stroke incidence, care, and outcome have altered over time.

          Methods:

          All stroke events registered in the Swedish Stroke Register 2005 to 2018 were included. Background variables and treatment were collected during the acute hospital stay. Survival data were obtained from the national cause of death register by individual linkage. We used unadjusted proportions and estimated age-adjusted marginal means, using a generalized linear model, to present outcome.

          Results:

          We identified 335 183 stroke events and a decreasing incidence in men and women 2005 to 2018. Men were on average younger than women (73.3 versus 78.1 years) at stroke onset. The age-adjusted proportion of reperfusion therapy 2005 to 2018 increased more rapidly in women than in men (2.3%–15.1% in men versus 1.4%–16.9% in women), but in 2018, women still had a lower probability of receiving thrombolysis within 30 minutes. Among patients with atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulants at discharge increased more rapidly in women (31.2%–78.6% in men versus 26.7%–81.9% in women). Statins remained higher in men (36.9%–83.7% in men versus 32.3%–81.2% in women). Men had better functional outcome and survival after stroke. After adjustment for women’s higher age, more severe strokes, and background characteristics, the absolute difference in functional outcome was <1% and survival did not differ.

          Conclusions:

          Stroke incidence, care, and outcome show continuous improvements in Sweden, and previously reported differences between men and women become less evident. More severe strokes and older age in women at stroke onset are explanations to persisting differences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

          Summary Background Neurological disorders are increasingly recognised as major causes of death and disability worldwide. The aim of this analysis from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2016 is to provide the most comprehensive and up-to-date estimates of the global, regional, and national burden from neurological disorders. Methods We estimated prevalence, incidence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs; the sum of years of life lost [YLLs] and years lived with disability [YLDs]) by age and sex for 15 neurological disorder categories (tetanus, meningitis, encephalitis, stroke, brain and other CNS cancers, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, motor neuron diseases, idiopathic epilepsy, migraine, tension-type headache, and a residual category for other less common neurological disorders) in 195 countries from 1990 to 2016. DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool, was the main method of estimation of prevalence and incidence, and the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm) was used for mortality estimation. We quantified the contribution of 84 risks and combinations of risk to the disease estimates for the 15 neurological disorder categories using the GBD comparative risk assessment approach. Findings Globally, in 2016, neurological disorders were the leading cause of DALYs (276 million [95% UI 247–308]) and second leading cause of deaths (9·0 million [8·8–9·4]). The absolute number of deaths and DALYs from all neurological disorders combined increased (deaths by 39% [34–44] and DALYs by 15% [9–21]) whereas their age-standardised rates decreased (deaths by 28% [26–30] and DALYs by 27% [24–31]) between 1990 and 2016. The only neurological disorders that had a decrease in rates and absolute numbers of deaths and DALYs were tetanus, meningitis, and encephalitis. The four largest contributors of neurological DALYs were stroke (42·2% [38·6–46·1]), migraine (16·3% [11·7–20·8]), Alzheimer's and other dementias (10·4% [9·0–12·1]), and meningitis (7·9% [6·6–10·4]). For the combined neurological disorders, age-standardised DALY rates were significantly higher in males than in females (male-to-female ratio 1·12 [1·05–1·20]), but migraine, multiple sclerosis, and tension-type headache were more common and caused more burden in females, with male-to-female ratios of less than 0·7. The 84 risks quantified in GBD explain less than 10% of neurological disorder DALY burdens, except stroke, for which 88·8% (86·5–90·9) of DALYs are attributable to risk factors, and to a lesser extent Alzheimer's disease and other dementias (22·3% [11·8–35·1] of DALYs are risk attributable) and idiopathic epilepsy (14·1% [10·8–17·5] of DALYs are risk attributable). Interpretation Globally, the burden of neurological disorders, as measured by the absolute number of DALYs, continues to increase. As populations are growing and ageing, and the prevalence of major disabling neurological disorders steeply increases with age, governments will face increasing demand for treatment, rehabilitation, and support services for neurological disorders. The scarcity of established modifiable risks for most of the neurological burden demonstrates that new knowledge is required to develop effective prevention and treatment strategies. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review.

            This systematic review of population-based studies of the incidence and early (21 days to 1 month) case fatality of stroke is based on studies published from 1970 to 2008. Stroke incidence (incident strokes only) and case fatality from 21 days to 1 month post-stroke were analysed by four decades of study, two country income groups (high-income countries and low to middle income countries, in accordance with the World Bank's country classification) and, when possible, by stroke pathological type: ischaemic stroke, primary intracerebral haemorrhage, and subarachnoid haemorrhage. This Review shows a divergent, statistically significant trend in stroke incidence rates over the past four decades, with a 42% decrease in stroke incidence in high-income countries and a greater than 100% increase in stroke incidence in low to middle income countries. In 2000-08, the overall stroke incidence rates in low to middle income countries have, for the first time, exceeded the level of stroke incidence seen in high-income countries, by 20%. The time to decide whether or not stroke is an issue that should be on the governmental agenda in low to middle income countries has now passed. Now is the time for action.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The global burden of neurological disorders: translating evidence into policy

              Neurological disorders are the leading cause of disability and the second leading cause of death worldwide. In the past 30 years, the absolute numbers of deaths and people with disabilities owing to neurological diseases have risen substantially, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries, and further increases are expected globally as a result of population growth and ageing. This rise in absolute numbers of people affected suggests that advances in prevention and management of major neurological disorders are not sufficiently effective to counter global demographic changes. Urgent measures to reduce this burden are therefore needed. Because resources for health care and research are already overstretched, priorities need to be set to guide policy makers, governments, and funding organisations to develop and implement action plans for prevention, health care, and research to tackle the growing challenge of neurological disorders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Stroke
                Stroke
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0039-2499
                1524-4628
                October 2021
                October 2021
                : 52
                : 10
                : 3233-3242
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Statistics, USBE, Umeå University, Sweden (M.E.).
                [2 ]Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Sweden (S.A.).
                [3 ]Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden (K.S.S.).
                [4 ]School of Medicine, Örebro University, Sweden (M.v.E.).
                Article
                10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033893
                34187179
                b9ae335d-5082-4ede-beba-a99869934115
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article