23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ualidação psicométrica da Escala da Relação Coparental em mães portuguesas Translated title: Validación psicométrica de la Escala de la Relación Coparental en madres portuguesas Translated title: Psychometric Validation of the Coparenting Relationship Scale in Portuguese mothers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumo O presente estudo teve como objetivo a adaptação e a validação da Escala de Relação Coparental -ERC- em mães portuguesas. A versão original da medida avalia as quatro dimensões da coparentalidade do modelo ecológico da coparentalidade, através de 7 subescalas. O estudo foi composto por uma amostra de 548 mães numa relação íntima heterossexual, e pelo menos um filho com o atual parceiro conjugal com uma idade inferior a 18 anos. Testada através de análise fatorial confirmatoria, a solução fatorial final investigada apresentou um ajustamento satisfatório, o que sugere a validade de construto da ERC, X2 (372) = 828.5, ns, CFI = 0.95, NFI = 0.91 e RMSEA = 0.04 (90 % IC = 0.04-0.05). A escala também apresentou coeficientes de consistência interna entre o satisfatório e o elevado em todas as subescalas (a de Cronbach entre 0.70 e 0.94) e valores muito satisfatórios de validade convergente e divergente, obtidos através de análises correlacionais da ERC com outros construtos teoricamente selecionados. Os resultados dão suporte inicial à qualidade psicométrica da versão portuguesa da ERC.

          Translated abstract

          Resumen El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo la adaptación y la validación de la Escala de Relación Coparental -ERC- en madres portuguesas. La versión original de la medida evalúa las cuatro dimensiones de la coparentalidad del modelo ecológico de la coparentalidad, a través de 7 subescalas. El estudio estuvo compuesto por una muestra de 548 madres en una relación íntima heterosexual y por lo menos un hijo con el actual compañero conyugal, con una edad inferior a 18 años. Probada a través de análisis factorial confirmatorio, la solución factorial final investigada presentó un ajuste satisfactorio, lo que sugiere la validez de constructo de la ERC, X2 (372) = 828.5, ns, CFI = 0.95, NFI = 0.91 y RMSEA = 0.04 (90 % IC = 0.04-0.05). La escala también presentó coeficientes de consistencia interna entre lo satisfactorio y lo elevado en todas las subescalas (a de Cronbach entre 0.70 e 0.94) y valores muy satisfactorios de validez convergente y divergente, obtenidos a través de análisis correlacionales de la ERC con otros constructos teóricamente seleccionados. Los resultados dan soporte inicial a la calidad psicométrica de la versión portuguesa de la ERC.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract The aim of the present study was to adapt and validate the Coparenting Relationship Scale -CRS- in a sample of Portuguese mothers. The original version of this measure assesses in seven subscales the four dimensions of coparenting described in the ecological model of coparenting. The study was composed by a sample of 548 mothers having a heterosexual intimate relationship and with at least one child (under 18 years) from the current marital relationship. Using a confirmatory factor analysis, the final factor solution revealed a satisfactory adjustment, suggesting the construct validity of the CRS, X2 (372) = 828.5, ns, CFI = 0.95, NFI = 0.91 e RMSEA = 0.04 (90 % IC = 0.04-0.05). The scale also showed coefficients of internal consistency between satisfactory and elevated in all subscales (Cronbach's a between 0.70 and 0.94) and satisfactory values of convergent and divergent validity, obtained through correlational analysis of CRS with other theoretically selected constructs. The results give initial support to the psychometric quality of the Portuguese version of CRS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis.

          In practice, the inclusion of correlated residuals in latent-variable models is often regarded as a statistical sleight of hand, if not an outright form of cheating. Consequently, researchers have tended to allow only as many correlated residuals in their models as are needed to obtain a good fit to the data. The current article demonstrates that this strategy leads to the underinclusion of residual correlations that are completely justified on the basis of measurement theory and research design. In many designs, the absence of such correlations will not substantially harm the fit of the model; however, failure to include them can change the meaning of the extracted latent variables and generate potentially misleading results. Recommendations include (a) returning to the full multitrait-multimethod design when measurement theory implies the existence of shared method variance and (b) abandoning the evil-but-necessary attitude toward correlated residuals when they reflect intended features of the research design. Copyright (c) 2008 APA.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Multi-Domain Self-Report Measure of Coparenting.

            OBJECTIVE: This study reports the psychometric properties of a multi-domain measure of the coparenting relationship in dual-parent families. METHOD: 152 couples participating in a transition to parenthood study completed the Coparenting Relationship Scale and additional measures during home visits at child age 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. RESULTS: Psychometric and construct validity assessments indicated the measure performed satisfactorily. The 35-item measure demonstrated good reliability and strong stability. Subscales measuring theoretically and empirically important aspects of coparenting (coparenting agreement, coparenting closeness, exposure of child to conflict, coparenting support, coparenting undermining, endorsement of partner's parenting, and division of labor) demonstrated good reliability as well. A 14-item brief overall measure showed very strong associations with the overall measure. Relations of the full scale with a measure of social desirability were weak, and the full scale was positively associated with positive dimensions of the dyadic couple relationship (love, sex/romance, couple efficacy) and inversely associated with negative dimensions (conflict, ineffective arguing)-as expected. CONCLUSIONS: This initial examination of the Coparenting Relationship Scale suggests that it possesses good psychometric properties (reliability, stability, construct validity, and inter-rater agreement), can be flexibly administered in short and long forms, and is positioned to promote further conceptual and methodological progress in the study of coparenting.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Coming to Terms with Coparenting: Implications of Definition and Measurement

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                apl
                Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana
                Av. Psicol. Latinoam.
                Universidad del Rosario (Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia )
                1794-4724
                2145-4515
                December 2018
                : 36
                : 3
                : 585-600
                Affiliations
                [1] Porto orgnameUniversidade Lusófona do Porto Portugal lamela@ 123456ulp.pt
                Article
                S1794-47242018000300585
                10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.5564
                b992e344-1f6c-4c98-b44e-4801ad935620

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 14 April 2017
                : 02 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 42, Pages: 16
                Product

                SciELO Colombia

                Categories
                Artigos

                coparentalidade,mães,validação,avaliação,assessment,validation,mothers,Coparenting,evaluación,validación,madres,coparentalidad

                Comments

                Comment on this article