0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Deconstructing depression by machine learning: the POKAL-PSY study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Unipolar depression is a prevalent and disabling condition, often left untreated. In the outpatient setting, general practitioners fail to recognize depression in about 50% of cases mainly due to somatic comorbidities. Given the significant economic, social, and interpersonal impact of depression and its increasing prevalence, there is a need to improve its diagnosis and treatment in outpatient care. Various efforts have been made to isolate individual biological markers for depression to streamline diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. However, the intricate and dynamic interplay between neuroinflammation, metabolic abnormalities, and relevant neurobiological correlates of depression is not yet fully understood. To address this issue, we propose a naturalistic prospective study involving outpatients with unipolar depression, individuals without depression or comorbidities, and healthy controls. In addition to clinical assessments, cardiovascular parameters, metabolic factors, and inflammatory parameters are collected. For analysis we will use conventional statistics as well as machine learning algorithms. We aim to detect relevant participant subgroups by data-driven cluster algorithms and their impact on the subjects’ long-term prognosis. The POKAL-PSY study is a subproject of the research network POKAL (Predictors and Clinical Outcomes in Depressive Disorders; GRK 2621).

          Related collections

          Most cited references138

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change

          The construction of a depression rating scale designed to be particularly sensitive to treatment effects is described. Ratings of 54 English and 52 Swedish patients on a 65 item comprehensive psychopathology scale were used to identify the 17 most commonly occurring symptoms in primary depressive illness in the combined sample. Ratings on these 17 items for 64 patients participating in studies of four different antidepressant drugs were used to create a depression scale consisting of the 10 items which showed the largest changes with treatment and the highest correlation to overall change. The inner-rater reliability of the new depression scale was high. Scores on the scale correlated significantly with scores on a standard rating scale for depression, the Hamilton Rating Scale (HRS), indicating its validity as a general severity estimate. Its capacity to differentiate between responders and non-responders to antidepressant treatment was better than the HRS, indicating greater sensitivity to change. The practical and ethical implications in terms of smaller sample sizes in clinical trials are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back.

            While resilience has been defined as resistance to illness, adaptation, and thriving, the ability to bounce back or recover from stress is closest to its original meaning. Previous resilience measures assess resources that may promote resilience rather than recovery, resistance, adaptation, or thriving. To test a new brief resilience scale. The brief resilience scale (BRS) was created to assess the ability to bounce back or recover from stress. Its psychometric characteristics were examined in four samples, including two student samples and samples with cardiac and chronic pain patients. The BRS was reliable and measured as a unitary construct. It was predictably related to personal characteristics, social relations, coping, and health in all samples. It was negatively related to anxiety, depression, negative affect, and physical symptoms when other resilience measures and optimism, social support, and Type D personality (high negative affect and high social inhibition) were controlled. There were large differences in BRS scores between cardiac patients with and without Type D and women with and without fibromyalgia. The BRS is a reliable means of assessing resilience as the ability to bounce back or recover from stress and may provide unique and important information about people coping with health-related stressors.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature.

              The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is among the most widely used questionnaires assessing subjective psychological well-being. Since its first publication in 1998, the WHO-5 has been translated into more than 30 languages and has been used in research studies all over the world. We now provide a systematic review of the literature on the WHO-5.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                j.eder@med.uni-muenchen.de
                Journal
                Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
                Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
                European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0940-1334
                1433-8491
                13 December 2023
                13 December 2023
                2024
                : 274
                : 5
                : 1153-1165
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5252.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 973X, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, , LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, ; Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336 Munich, Germany
                [2 ]Graduate Program “POKAL - Predictors and Outcomes in Primary Care” (DFG-GrK 2621, Munich, Germany
                [3 ]GRID grid.4372.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2105 1091, International Max Planck Research School for Translational Psychiatry (IMPRS-TP), ; Munich, Germany
                [4 ]Max-Planck Institute of Psychiatry, ( https://ror.org/04dq56617) Munich, Germany
                [5 ]Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FMUSP), ( https://ror.org/036rp1748) São Paulo, SP Brasil
                [6 ]Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, ( https://ror.org/02kkvpp62) Munich, Germany
                [7 ]Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, ( https://ror.org/05591te55) Munich, Germany
                [8 ]Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM27), Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, ( https://ror.org/036rp1748) São Paulo, Brazil
                [9 ]Oberberg Specialist Clinic Bad Tölz, Bad Tölz, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1330-804X
                Article
                1720
                10.1007/s00406-023-01720-9
                11226486
                38091084
                b947822f-e183-464c-b90a-177e4dc7d330
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 26 April 2023
                : 4 November 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft;
                Award ID: GRK 2621
                Award ID: GRK 2621
                Award ID: GRK 2621
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (1024)
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

                Neurosciences
                mdd,phenotyping,machine learning,biological psychiatry
                Neurosciences
                mdd, phenotyping, machine learning, biological psychiatry

                Comments

                Comment on this article