1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Peer-Assisted Learning in Undergraduate Midwifery Clinical Education: A Qualitative Study on Experiences of Nursing Students From Three Namibian Training Institutions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Peer-assisted learning is widely used in nursing education and is reported to have a positive impact on the students’ learning process. However, students’ experiences of peer-assisted learning from midwifery clinical education in resource-constrained, overcrowded, and small maternity sections are not documented.

          Objective

          This study was undertaken to explore undergraduate nursing students’ experiences of peer-assisted learning in midwifery clinical education context in Namibia.

          Methods

          The study was approached from a social constructivism, with explorative, descriptive, and contextual qualitative as a methodological approach. The sample consisted of 32 nursing students from three training institutions, who were conveniently sampled. Data collection was via five focus group discussions, which used a focus group discussion guide, audio recorder, and field notes as research instruments. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

          Results

          Main themes that emerged from thematic analysis are students’ conceptions of peer-assisted learning, benefits, challenges, and suggestions made to improve peer-assisted learning in midwifery clinical education. In thematic area of students’ conceptions of peer-assisted learning, peer teaching tools, engagement, care, and support of peers were recorded as subthemes. The benefits of peer-assisted learning included teamwork, professional identity, a deep approach to learning, communication, coping mechanisms, and socialization. Challenges experienced by students while using peer-assisted learning are learning wrong practices from peers, personality influence, discrimination, labeling, and name calling. Suggestions made by students were formalization and training of students on peer-assisted learning.

          Conclusions

          Students’ experiences of peer-assisted learning relate to how they understand it as a concept, their interaction with peers, and learning materials. In addition, students made suggestions to improve peer-assisted learning in midwifery clinical practice. These results may be useful in developing peer-assisted frameworks and guiding documents for use in its implementation in midwifery clinical education.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization

          Saturation has attained widespread acceptance as a methodological principle in qualitative research. It is commonly taken to indicate that, on the basis of the data that have been collected or analysed hitherto, further data collection and/or analysis are unnecessary. However, there appears to be uncertainty as to how saturation should be conceptualized, and inconsistencies in its use. In this paper, we look to clarify the nature, purposes and uses of saturation, and in doing so add to theoretical debate on the role of saturation across different methodologies. We identify four distinct approaches to saturation, which differ in terms of the extent to which an inductive or a deductive logic is adopted, and the relative emphasis on data collection, data analysis, and theorizing. We explore the purposes saturation might serve in relation to these different approaches, and the implications for how and when saturation will be sought. In examining these issues, we highlight the uncertain logic underlying saturation—as essentially a predictive statement about the unobserved based on the observed, a judgement that, we argue, results in equivocation, and may in part explain the confusion surrounding its use. We conclude that saturation should be operationalized in a way that is consistent with the research question(s), and the theoretical position and analytic framework adopted, but also that there should be some limit to its scope, so as not to risk saturation losing its coherence and potency if its conceptualization and uses are stretched too widely.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Peer Learning and Assessment

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                SAGE Open Nurs
                SAGE Open Nurs
                SON
                spson
                SAGE Open Nursing
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2377-9608
                3 April 2025
                Jan-Dec 2025
                : 11
                : 23779608251328286
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Nursing and Public Health, Ringgold 99404, universityUniversity of Namibia; , Windhoek, Namibia
                Author notes
                [*]Vistolina Nuuyoma, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia. Emails: vistolina.nuuyoma@ 123456gmail.com , vnuuyoma@ 123456unam.na
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-1355
                Article
                10.1177_23779608251328286
                10.1177/23779608251328286
                11970059
                b91b05df-09eb-4be2-a8a6-2337ab6988b2
                © The Author(s) 2025

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 1 December 2024
                : 1 February 2025
                : 28 February 2025
                Categories
                Original Research Article
                Custom metadata
                ts19
                January-December 2025

                undergraduate nursing programs,midwifery,nursing education,focus group,clinical settings,midwifery clinical education

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content738

                Most referenced authors345