15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In Vitro Activity of New β-Lactam–β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations and Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli: Results from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2019

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Novel β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs) are in clinical development for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) (defined as resistance to all tested β-lactams and fluoroquinolones) Gram-negative bacilli. This study evaluated the in vitro activities of cefepime-zidebactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, cefepime-tazobactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and other comparators against 4,042 nonduplicate Gram-negative clinical isolates collected from different regions of China (46 hospitals) in 2019. Based on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) breakpoints, cefepime-zidebactam inhibited 98.5% of Enterobacterales and 98.9% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Against carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacilli, cefepime-zidebactam demonstrated better activity against Enterobacterales (96% and 97.2%, respectively) and P. aeruginosa (98.2% and 96.9%, respectively). Among the 379 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates, the most common carbapenemase genes detected were bla KPC-2 (64.1%) and bla NDM (30.9%). Cefepime-zidebactam showed an MIC 90 of ≤2 mg/L for 98.8% of bla KPC-positive isolates and 89.7% of bla NDM-positive isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam also showed efficient in vitro activity against Enterobacterales (93.6%) and P. aeruginosa (87.7%). Ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 97.5% of bla KPC-positive isolates and 100% of bla OXA-232-positive isolates. Cefepime-zidebactam inhibited 97.3% of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates with an MIC 50/90 of 16/32 mg/L. Our study systematically evaluated the in vitro activities of these new BLBLIs against a variety of Gram-negative bacilli, provided preclinical data for the approval of these BLBLIs in China, and supported cefepime-zidebactam and ceftazidime-avibactam as potential efficient therapies for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA), and DTR isolates.

          IMPORTANCE Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii are the most common Gram-negative bacilli to cause nosocomial infections throughout the world. Due to their large public health and societal implications, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB), carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA), and carbapenem-resistant and third-generation-cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were regarded by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global priority for investment in new drugs in 2017. The present study showed the potent in vitro activity of these novel BLBLIs and other comparators against Gram-negative bacillus isolates, including carbapenem-resistant or difficult-to-treat resistant phenotypes. Polymyxins, tigecycline, and ceftazidime-avibactam (except for bla NDM-positive isolates) were available for the treatment of infections caused by CRE isolates. Currently, cefepime-zidebactam and other BLBLIs have not yet been approved for use in China. Here, our study aimed to evaluate the in vitro activities of BLBLIs against Gram-negative bacillus isolates, especially CRE, before clinical use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis

          The spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses a substantial threat to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Due to its large public health and societal implications, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis has been long regarded by WHO as a global priority for investment in new drugs. In 2016, WHO was requested by member states to create a priority list of other antibiotic-resistant bacteria to support research and development of effective drugs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes.

            A rapid and reliable PCR-based technique was developed for detection of genes encoding carbapenemases belonging to different classes. Primers were designed to amplify the following 11 genes: bla(IMP), bla(VIM), bla(NDM), bla(SPM), bla(AIM), bla(DIM), bla(GIM), bla(SIM)bla(KPC), bla(BIC), and bla(OXA-48). Three different multiplex reaction mixtures were defined and evaluated for the detection of all these 11 genes. Using optimized conditions, each reaction mixture allowed to identify the respective genes, with PCR giving distinct amplicon sizes corresponding to the different genes for each mixture. We reported here a rapid and reliable technique for screening all clinically relevant carbapenemase genes. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Emergence of plasmid-mediated high-level tigecycline resistance genes in animals and humans

              Tigecycline is a last-resort antibiotic that is used to treat severe infections caused by extensively drug-resistant bacteria. tet(X) has been shown to encode a flavin-dependent monooxygenase that modifies tigecycline1,2. Here, we report two unique mobile tigecycline-resistance genes, tet(X3) and tet(X4), in numerous Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter that were isolated from animals, meat for consumption and humans. Tet(X3) and Tet(X4) inactivate all tetracyclines, including tigecycline and the newly FDA-approved eravacycline and omadacycline. Both tet(X3) and tet(X4) increase (by 64-128-fold) the tigecycline minimal inhibitory concentration values for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii. In addition, both Tet(X3) (A. baumannii) and Tet(X4) (E. coli) significantly compromise tigecycline in in vivo infection models. Both tet(X3) and tet(X4) are adjacent to insertion sequence ISVsa3 on their respective conjugative plasmids and confer a mild fitness cost (relative fitness of >0.704). Database mining and retrospective screening analyses confirm that tet(X3) and tet(X4) are globally present in clinical bacteria-even in the same bacteria as blaNDM-1, resulting in resistance to both tigecycline and carbapenems. Our findings suggest that both the surveillance of tet(X) variants in clinical and animal sectors and the use of tetracyclines in food production require urgent global attention.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                Microbiol Spectr
                Microbiol Spectr
                spectrum
                Microbiology Spectrum
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                2165-0497
                12 July 2022
                Jul-Aug 2022
                12 July 2022
                : 10
                : 4
                : e01854-22
                Affiliations
                [a ] Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
                [b ] Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
                [c ] First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan, China
                [d ] Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Shandong, China
                [e ] Taizhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China
                Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
                Author notes

                Yan Guo, Renru Han, and Bo Jiang contributed equally to this work. Author order was determined both alphabetically and in order of increasing seniority.

                The authors declare no conflict of interest.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4493-0619
                Article
                01854-22 spectrum.01854-22
                10.1128/spectrum.01854-22
                9431184
                35862963
                b8536913-8b70-48d0-aa92-5c82e1fe6c9e
                Copyright © 2022 Guo et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 8 June 2022
                : 24 June 2022
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 0, Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 26, Pages: 12, Words: 6282
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 81902100
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 81871690
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 82172311
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 32141002
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                antimicrobial-chemotherapy, Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
                Custom metadata
                July/August 2022

                β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations,difficult-to-treat resistance,cefepime-zidebactam,ceftazidime-avibactam,carbapenemase

                Comments

                Comment on this article