5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Heat stress responses and population genetics of the kelp Laminaria digitata (Phaeophyceae) across latitudes reveal differentiation among North Atlantic populations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To understand the thermal plasticity of a coastal foundation species across its latitudinal distribution, we assess physiological responses to high temperature stress in the kelp Laminaria digitata in combination with population genetic characteristics and relate heat resilience to genetic features and phylogeography. We hypothesize that populations from Arctic and cold‐temperate locations are less heat resilient than populations from warm distributional edges. Using meristems of natural L. digitata populations from six locations ranging between Kongsfjorden, Spitsbergen (79°N), and Quiberon, France (47°N), we performed a common‐garden heat stress experiment applying 15°C to 23°C over eight days. We assessed growth, photosynthetic quantum yield, carbon and nitrogen storage, and xanthophyll pigment contents as response traits. Population connectivity and genetic diversity were analyzed with microsatellite markers. Results from the heat stress experiment suggest that the upper temperature limit of L. digitata is nearly identical across its distribution range, but subtle differences in growth and stress responses were revealed for three populations from the species’ ecological range margins. Two populations at the species’ warm distribution limit showed higher temperature tolerance compared to other populations in growth at 19°C and recovery from 21°C (Quiberon, France), and photosynthetic quantum yield and xanthophyll pigment responses at 23°C (Helgoland, Germany). In L. digitata from the northernmost population (Spitsbergen, Norway), quantum yield indicated the highest heat sensitivity. Microsatellite genotyping revealed all sampled populations to be genetically distinct, with a strong hierarchical structure between southern and northern clades. Genetic diversity was lowest in the isolated population of the North Sea island of Helgoland and highest in Roscoff in the English Channel. All together, these results support the hypothesis of moderate local differentiation across L. digitata's European distribution, whereas effects are likely too weak to ameliorate the species’ capacity to withstand ocean warming and marine heatwaves at the southern range edge.

          Abstract

          We aimed to understand the intraspecific thermal variation of a coastal foundation species, the kelp Laminaria digitata. Marginal populations in particular differed in their response to heat stress treatments, while multilocus genotypes showed a clear and broad separation of L. digitata populations into a “northern” and a “southern” clade. These results imply that L. digitata populations have phenotypically diverged under the influence of the Quaternary glacial cycles.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.

          M Nei (1978)
          The magnitudes of the systematic biases involved in sample heterozygosity and sample genetic distances are evaluated, and formulae for obtaining unbiased estimates of average heterozygosity and genetic distance are developed. It is also shown that the number of individuals to be used for estimating average heterozygosity can be very small if a large number of loci are studied and the average heterozygosity is low. The number of individuals to be used for estimating genetic distance can also be very small if the genetic distance is large and the average heterozygosity of the two species compared is low.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters.

            Modern climate change is producing poleward range shifts of numerous taxa, communities and ecosystems worldwide. The response of species to changing environments is likely to be determined largely by population responses at range margins. In contrast to the expanding edge, the low-latitude limit (rear edge) of species ranges remains understudied, and the critical importance of rear edge populations as long-term stores of species' genetic diversity and foci of speciation has been little acknowledged. We review recent findings from the fossil record, phylogeography and ecology to illustrate that rear edge populations are often disproportionately important for the survival and evolution of biota. Their ecological features, dynamics and conservation requirements differ from those of populations in other parts of the range, and some commonly recommended conservation practices might therefore be of little use or even counterproductive for rear edge populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A hierarchical approach to defining marine heatwaves

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                daniel.liesner@awi.de
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                17 August 2020
                September 2020
                : 10
                : 17 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v10.17 )
                : 9144-9177
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven Germany
                [ 2 ] UMI EBEA 3614, Evolutionary Biology and Ecology of Algae, CNRS Sorbonne Université, UC, UACH, Station Biologique de Roscoff Roscoff Cedex France
                [ 3 ] Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research Bodø Norway
                [ 4 ] The Marine Science Institute, College of Science University of the Philippines, Diliman Quezon City Philippines
                [ 5 ] Centre for Marine Sciences (CCMAR) University of Algarve Faro Portugal
                [ 6 ] Marine Botany University of Bremen Bremen Germany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Daniel Liesner, Alfred‐Wegener‐Institute, Helmholtz‐Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany.

                Email: daniel.liesner@ 123456awi.de

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2125-9498
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-9339
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9000-1423
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0568-9081
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-464X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4497-1920
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7401-9423
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7609-2149
                Article
                ECE36569
                10.1002/ece3.6569
                7487260
                32953052
                b7d88165-61e6-4146-9966-bc32f5e1a7ae
                © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 March 2020
                : 10 June 2020
                : 15 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 12, Tables: 12, Pages: 34, Words: 21280
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: VA 105/25‐1
                Funded by: Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL
                Funded by: Conseil Régional de Bretagne , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100004584;
                Award ID: ARED2017: REEALG
                Funded by: Foundation for Science and Technology
                Award ID: UIDB/04326/2020
                Award ID: PTDC/MAR‐EST/6053/2014
                Award ID: Biodiversa/0004/2015
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.0 mode:remove_FC converted:13.09.2020

                Evolutionary Biology
                growth rate,local adaptation,marine forest,marine heatwave,microsatellite,physiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article