23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Maternal region of birth and stillbirth in Victoria, Australia 2000–2011: A retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is growing evidence from high-income countries that maternal country of birth is a risk factor for stillbirth. We aimed to examine the association between maternal region of birth and stillbirth between 2000 and 2011 inclusive in Victoria, Australia.

          Methods

          Retrospective population based cohort study of all singleton births at 24 or more weeks gestational age from 2000–2011 in Victoria, Australia. Stillbirths due to termination of pregnancy, babies with congenital anomalies and Indigenous mothers were excluded. Main Outcome Measure: Stillbirth.

          Results

          Over the 12-year period there were 685,869 singleton births and 2299 stillbirths, giving an overall stillbirth rate of 3·4 per 1000 births. After adjustment for risk factors, compared to women born in Australia/New Zealand, women born in South Asia (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01–1.53, p = 0.01), were more likely to have a stillbirth whereas women born in South East and East Asia were (aOR 0.60, (95% CI 0.49–0.72, p<0.001) less likely to have a stillbirth. Additionally, the increasing rate of stillbirth as gestation length progressed began to rise earlier and more steeply in the South Asian compared to Australian/New Zealand born women. The following risk factors were also significantly associated with an increased odds of stillbirth in multivariate analyses: maternal age <20 and 35 years and more, nulliparity, low socio-economic status, previous stillbirth, no ultrasound reported in 1 st trimester, pre-existing hypertension, antepartum haemorrhage and failure to detect growth restriction antenatally.

          Conclusion

          Maternal region of birth is an independent risk factor for stillbirth. Improvements in the rate of stillbirth, particularly late pregnancy stillbirth, are likely to be gained in high-income settings where clinical care is informed by maternal region of birth.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study

          Objective To assess the main risk factors associated with stillbirth in a multiethnic English maternity population. Design Cohort study. Setting National Health Service region in England. Population 92 218 normally formed singletons including 389 stillbirths from 24 weeks of gestation, delivered during 2009-11. Main outcome measure Risk of stillbirth. Results Multivariable analysis identified a significant risk of stillbirth for parity (para 0 and para ≥3), ethnicity (African, African-Caribbean, Indian, and Pakistani), maternal obesity (body mass index ≥30), smoking, pre-existing diabetes, and history of mental health problems, antepartum haemorrhage, and fetal growth restriction (birth weight below 10th customised birthweight centile). As potentially modifiable risk factors, maternal obesity, smoking in pregnancy, and fetal growth restriction together accounted for 56.1% of the stillbirths. Presence of fetal growth restriction constituted the highest risk, and this applied to pregnancies where mothers did not smoke (adjusted relative risk 7.8, 95% confidence interval 6.6 to 10.9), did smoke (5.7, 3.6 to 10.9), and were exposed to passive smoke only (10.0, 6.6 to 15.8). Fetal growth restriction also had the largest population attributable risk for stillbirth and was fivefold greater if it was not detected antenatally than when it was (32.0% v 6.2%). In total, 195 of the 389 stillbirths in this cohort had fetal growth restriction, but in 160 (82%) it had not been detected antenatally. Antenatal recognition of fetal growth restriction resulted in delivery 10 days earlier than when it was not detected: median 270 (interquartile range 261-279) days v 280 (interquartile range 273-287) days. The overall stillbirth rate (per 1000 births) was 4.2, but only 2.4 in pregnancies without fetal growth restriction, increasing to 9.7 with antenatally detected fetal growth restriction and 19.8 when it was not detected. Conclusion Most normally formed singleton stillbirths are potentially avoidable. The single largest risk factor is unrecognised fetal growth restriction, and preventive strategies need to focus on improving antenatal detection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Stillbirths: ending preventable deaths by 2030.

            Efforts to achieve the new worldwide goals for maternal and child survival will also prevent stillbirth and improve health and developmental outcomes. However, the number of annual stillbirths remains unchanged since 2011 and is unacceptably high: an estimated 2.6 million in 2015. Failure to consistently include global targets or indicators for stillbirth in post-2015 initiatives shows that stillbirths are hidden in the worldwide agenda. This Series paper summarises findings from previous papers in this Series, presents new analyses, and proposes specific criteria for successful integration of stillbirths into post-2015 initiatives for women's and children's health. Five priority areas to change the stillbirth trend include intentional leadership; increased voice, especially of women; implementation of integrated interventions with commensurate investment; indicators to measure effect of interventions and especially to monitor progress; and investigation into crucial knowledge gaps. The post-2015 agenda represents opportunities for all stakeholders to act together to end all preventable deaths, including stillbirths.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stillbirth.

              In the UK, about one in 200 infants is stillborn, and rates of stillbirth have recently slightly increased. This recent rise might reflect increasing frequency of some important maternal risk factors for stillbirth, including nulliparity, advanced age, and obesity. Most stillbirths are related to placental dysfunction, which in many women is evident from the first half of pregnancy and is associated with fetal growth restriction. There is no effective screening test that has clearly shown a reduction in stillbirth rates in the general population. However, assessments of novel screening methods have generally failed to distinguish between effective identification of high-risk women and successful intervention for such women. Future research into stillbirth will probably focus on understanding the pathophysiology of impaired placentation to establish screening tests for stillbirth, and assessment of interventions to prevent stillbirth in women who screen positive.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                6 June 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 6
                : e0178727
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [2 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                Univesity of Iowa, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: MDT has a secondment 1 day per week to CCOPMM. MAD is a part time employee of Clinical Councils Unit which manages the VPDC data and EW is a CEO of Safer Care Victoria, Department of health. These conflicts do not alter adherence to the PLOS ONE policies.

                • Conceptualization: MDT MAD EW.

                • Data curation: MDT MAD EW.

                • Formal analysis: MDT MAD.

                • Funding acquisition: MDT.

                • Investigation: MDT MAD.

                • Methodology: MDT MAD EW.

                • Project administration: MDT MAD EW.

                • Resources: EW.

                • Supervision: EW.

                • Validation: MDT MAD EW.

                • Visualization: MDT MAD EW.

                • Writing – original draft: MDT MAD EW.

                • Writing – review & editing: MDT MAD EW.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-5538
                Article
                PONE-D-17-03254
                10.1371/journal.pone.0178727
                5460852
                28586367
                b7c1c297-b7fd-4fcb-a42e-7e2cccae2e5c
                © 2017 Davies-Tuck et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 24 January 2017
                : 17 May 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001076, Stillbirth Foundation;
                Award Recipient : Miranda Davies-Tuck
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000925, National Health and Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: ECR Fellowship
                Award Recipient : Miranda Davies-Tuck
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004752, State Government of Victoria;
                Award ID: Operational Infrastructure Support Program
                Award Recipient :
                MDT received support from the Stillbirth Foundation of Australia to undertake this project. MDT also receives support from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Fellowship program. EW receives funding from the Victorian Governments’ Operational Infrastructure Support Program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Stillbirths
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Birth
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Birth
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Pregnancy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Pregnancy
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Ethnicities
                Africans
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pediatrics
                Child Development
                Child Growth
                Growth Restriction
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Oceania
                Australia
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Ethnicities
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Asia
                Custom metadata
                The data used in this manuscript was obtained from a third party and as such we do not own it. The data was provided by the Clinical Councils Unit at the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. It is a population-based surveillance system that collects and analyses comprehensive information on the health of mothers and babies, in order to contribute to improvements in their health in Victoria. The data can be requested by contacting: Clinical Councils Unit, Department of Health & Human Services Email: clinical.councils@ 123456dhhs.vic.gov.au Location: 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, 3000 Victoria, Australia.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content178

                Cited by25

                Most referenced authors534