74
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Child Development During the COVID‐19 Pandemic Through a Life Course Theory Lens

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID‐19 global pandemic and the resulting economic, health, and educational disruptions have upset all aspects of young people’s lives. The pandemic’s reach will likely continue in the near term and as psychological and academic trajectories unfold over time. In this article, we draw on the central tenets of life course theory—intertwined developmental trajectories, linked lives, and stratification systems (Elder, 1998)—to inform understanding of potential adverse effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic on children’s and adolescents’ adjustment and well‐being, as well as mechanisms and processes that may buffer or exacerbate the pandemic’s negative impact. We review empirical evidence on the impact of previous macro‐level crises (e.g., the Great Recession) to illustrate how life course theory can aid developmental scientists in examining the effects of COVID‐19 on children’s development. We conclude with recommendations for research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          COVID-19 and Racial/Ethnic Disparities

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.

            The COVID-19 pandemic poses an acute threat to the well-being of children and families due to challenges related to social disruption such as financial insecurity, caregiving burden, and confinement-related stress (e.g., crowding, changes to structure, and routine). The consequences of these difficulties are likely to be longstanding, in part because of the ways in which contextual risk permeates the structures and processes of family systems. The current article draws from pertinent literature across topic areas of acute crises and long-term, cumulative risk to illustrate the multitude of ways in which the well-being of children and families may be at risk during COVID-19. The presented conceptual framework is based on systemic models of human development and family functioning and links social disruption due to COVID-19 to child adjustment through a cascading process involving caregiver well-being and family processes (i.e., organization, communication, and beliefs). An illustration of the centrality of family processes in buffering against risk in the context of COVID-19, as well as promoting resilience through shared family beliefs and close relationships, is provided. Finally, clinical and research implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review

              Summary In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 107 countries had implemented national school closures by March 18, 2020. It is unknown whether school measures are effective in coronavirus outbreaks (eg, due to severe acute respiratory syndrome [SARS], Middle East respiratory syndrome, or COVID-19). We undertook a systematic review by searching three electronic databases to identify what is known about the effectiveness of school closures and other school social distancing practices during coronavirus outbreaks. We included 16 of 616 identified articles. School closures were deployed rapidly across mainland China and Hong Kong for COVID-19. However, there are no data on the relative contribution of school closures to transmission control. Data from the SARS outbreak in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Singapore suggest that school closures did not contribute to the control of the epidemic. Modelling studies of SARS produced conflicting results. Recent modelling studies of COVID-19 predict that school closures alone would prevent only 2–4% of deaths, much less than other social distancing interventions. Policy makers need to be aware of the equivocal evidence when considering school closures for COVID-19, and that combinations of social distancing measures should be considered. Other less disruptive social distancing interventions in schools require further consideration if restrictive social distancing policies are implemented for long periods.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mistry@gseis.ucla.edu
                Journal
                Child Dev Perspect
                Child Dev Perspect
                10.1111/(ISSN)1750-8606
                CDEP
                Child Development Perspectives
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1750-8592
                1750-8606
                15 October 2020
                December 2020
                : 14
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/cdep.v14.4 )
                : 236-243
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] University of Texas at Austin
                [ 2 ] University of California at Los Angeles
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Rashmita S. Mistry, Department of Education, University of California at Los Angeles, 3302A Moore Hall, Box 951521, Los Angeles, CA 90095; e‐mail: mistry@ 123456gseis.ucla.edu .

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-1227
                Article
                CDEP12387
                10.1111/cdep.12387
                7675461
                33230400
                b77268d7-1c9d-4259-945d-506229bc3589
                © 2020 Society for Research in Child Development

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Pages: 8, Words: 14519
                Funding
                Funded by: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100009633;
                Award ID: K01HD087479
                Award ID: P2CHD042849
                Categories
                Article
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.4 mode:remove_FC converted:19.11.2020

                life course theory,covid‐19,children,adolescence
                life course theory, covid‐19, children, adolescence

                Comments

                Comment on this article