6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative assessment of genetic diversity matrices and clustering methods in white Guinea yam ( Dioscorea rotundata) based on morphological and molecular markers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Understanding the diversity and genetic relationships among and within crop germplasm is invaluable for genetic improvement. This study assessed genetic diversity in a panel of 173 D. rotundata accessions using joint analysis for 23 morphological traits and 136,429 SNP markers from the whole-genome resequencing platform. Various diversity matrices and clustering methods were evaluated for a comprehensive characterization of genetic diversity in white Guinea yam from West Africa at phenotypic and molecular levels. The translation of the different diversity matrices from the phenotypic and genomic information into distinct groups varied with the hierarchal clustering methods used. Gower distance matrix based on phenotypic data and identity by state (IBS) distance matrix based on SNP data with the UPGMA clustering method found the best fit to dissect the genetic relationship in current set materials. However, the grouping pattern was inconsistent (r = − 0.05) between the morphological and molecular distance matrices due to the non-overlapping information between the two data types. Joint analysis for the phenotypic and molecular information maximized a comprehensive estimate of the actual diversity in the evaluated materials. The results from our study provide valuable insights for measuring quantitative genetic variability for breeding and genetic studies in yam and other root and tuber crops.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species.

          Determining true genetic dissimilarity between individuals is an important and decisive point for clustering and analysing diversity within and among populations, because different dissimilarity indices may yield conflicting outcomes. We show that there are no acceptable universal approaches to assessing the dissimilarity between individuals with molecular markers. Different measures are relevant to dominant and codominant DNA markers depending on the ploidy of organisms. The Dice coefficient is the suitable measure for haploids with codominant markers and it can be applied directly to (0,1)-vectors representing banding profiles of individuals. None of the common measures, Dice, Jaccard, simple mismatch coefficient (or the squared Euclidean distance), is appropriate for diploids with codominant markers. By transforming multiallelic banding patterns at each locus into the corresponding homozygous or heterozygous states, a new measure of dissimilarity within locus was developed and expanded to assess dissimilarity between multilocus states of two individuals by averaging across all codominant loci tested. There is no rigorous well-founded solution in the case of dominant markers. The simple mismatch coefficient is the most suitable measure of dissimilarity between banding patterns of closely related haploid forms. For distantly related haploid individuals, the Jaccard dissimilarity is recommended. In general, no suitable method for measuring genetic dissimilarity between diploids with dominant markers can be proposed. Banding patterns of diploids with dominant markers and polyploids with codominant markers represent individuals' phenotypes rather than genotypes. All dissimilarity measures proposed and developed herein are metrics.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of hierarchical cluster analysis methods by cophenetic correlation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Genetical and Mathematical Properties of Similarity and Dissimilarity Coefficients Applied in Plant Breeding and Seed Bank Management

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                A.Amele@cgiar.org
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                6 August 2020
                6 August 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 13191
                Affiliations
                [1 ]International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria
                [2 ]GRID grid.9582.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1794 5983, Institute of Life and Earth Sciences, , Pan African University, University of Ibadan, ; Ibadan, Nigeria
                [3 ]GRID grid.9582.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1794 5983, Department of Agronomy, , University of Ibadan, ; Ibadan, Nigeria
                [4 ]GRID grid.452611.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2107 8171, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, ; Tsukuba, Japan
                [5 ]GRID grid.5386.8, ISNI 000000041936877X, Boyce Thompson Institute, ; Ithaca, NY USA
                [6 ]International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Abuja, Nigeria
                [7 ]GRID grid.277489.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0376 441X, Iwate Biotechnology Research Center, ; Kitakami, Iwate Japan
                [8 ]GRID grid.55614.33, ISNI 0000 0001 1302 4958, Present Address: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, ; 850 Lincoln Road, Fredericton, NB E3B 4Z7 Canada
                Article
                69925
                10.1038/s41598-020-69925-9
                7413250
                32764649
                b76f7413-c70b-4ce3-9c34-f9ed3a305698
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 November 2019
                : 16 July 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: OPP1052998
                Award ID: OPP1052998
                Award ID: OPP1052998
                Award ID: OPP1052998
                Award ID: OPP1052998
                Award ID: OPP1052998
                Award ID: OPP1052998
                Award ID: OPP1052998
                Award ID: OPP1052998
                Award ID: OPP1052998
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Uncategorized
                genetics,plant sciences
                Uncategorized
                genetics, plant sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article