13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      SMILE and Wavefront-Guided LASIK Out-Compete Other Refractive Surgeries in Ameliorating the Induction of High-Order Aberrations in Anterior Corneal Surface

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose. To compare the change of anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registration (WF-LASIK), femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods. In a prospective study, 82 eyes underwent LASIK, 119 eyes underwent WF-LASIK, 88 eyes underwent FS-LASIK, and 170 eyes underwent SMILE surgery. HOAs were measured with Pentacam device preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. The aberrations were described as Zernike polynomials, and analysis focused on total HOAs, spherical aberration (SA), horizontal coma, and vertical coma over 6 mm diameter central corneal zone. Results. Six months postoperatively, all procedures result in increase of anterior corneal total HOAs and SA. There were no significant differences in the induced HOAs between LASIK and FS-LASIK, while SMILE induced fewer total HOAs and SA compared with LASIK and FS-LASIK. Similarly, WF-LASIK also induced less total HOAs than LASIK and FS-LASIK, but only fewer SA than FS-LASIK ( P < 0.05). No significant difference could be detected in the induced total HOAs and SA between SMILE and WF-LASIK, whereas SMILE induced more horizontal coma and vertical coma compared with WF-LASIK ( P < 0.05). Conclusion. FS-LASIK and LASIK induced comparable anterior corneal HOAs. Compared to LASIK and FS-LASIK, both SMILE and WF-LASIK showed advantages in inducing less total HOAs. In addition, SMILE also possesses better ability to reduce the induction of SA in comparison with LASIK and FS-LASIK. However, SMILE induced more horizontal coma and vertical coma compared with WF-LASIK, indicating that the centration of SMILE procedure is probably less precise than WF-LASIK.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery.

          To report the clinical results of small incision lenticule extraction to correct refractive errors using a femtosecond laser to refine the femtosecond lenticule extraction technique. Private laser center, Vadodara, India. Prospective clinical study. The VisuMax femtosecond laser system was used to perform small incision lenticule extraction to treat refractive errors. The laser was used to cut a refractive lenticule intrastromally to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism. The lenticule was then extracted from the stroma through a 3.0 to 5.0 mm incision. Outcome measures were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and manifest refraction during 6 months of follow-up. Corneal topography and ocular wavefront aberrations were also measured. The study enrolled 51 eyes of 41 patients. The mean spherical equivalent was -4.87 diopters (D) ± 2.16 (SD) preoperatively and +0.03 ± 0.30 D 6 months postoperatively. Refractive stability was achieved within 1 month (P<.01). Six months after surgery, 79% of all full-correction cases had a UDVA of 20/25 or better. The 6-month postoperative CDVA was the same as or better than the preoperative CDVA in 95% of eyes. Two eyes lost 1 line of CDVA. All-in-one femtosecond refractive correction using a small incision technique was safe, predictable, and effective in treating myopia and myopic astigmatism. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosure is found in the footnotes. Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann–Shack wave-front sensor

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: six-month results.

              To prospectively study the feasibility of femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLE), a new method of refractive correction. Department of Ophthalmology, Philipps University of Marburg and Helios Clinic, Erfurt, Germany. A flap and a lenticule of intrastromal corneal tissue were simultaneously cut with a VisuMax femtosecond laser system. Next, the lenticule was manually removed and the flap repositioned. The target refraction in all cases was -0.75 diopter (D). All 10 myopic eyes in the initial treatment group completed the final 6-month follow-up. The mean patient age was 39 years. The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.73 +/- 1.48 (SD) preoperatively and -0.33 +/- 0.61 D 6 months postoperatively. Ninety percent of eyes were within +/-1.00 D and 40% were within +/-0.50 D of the intended correction. No eye lost 2 or more Snellen lines. Corneal topography showed large, prolate optical zones. Aberrometry showed no significant induction of higher-order aberrations. On a standardized questionnaire, all patients said they were very satisfied with the results. Preliminary results indicate that FLEx [corrected] is a promising new corneal refractive procedure to correct myopia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Ophthalmol
                J Ophthalmol
                JOPH
                Journal of Ophthalmology
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                2090-004X
                2090-0058
                2016
                13 October 2016
                : 2016
                : 8702162
                Affiliations
                1Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
                2Department of Ophthalmology, The Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
                3Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Medical College of Xiamen University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Xiamen, Fujian, China
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Edward Manche

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2068-8431
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6224-974X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0042-0577
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5163-0959
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-234X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2454-8532
                Article
                10.1155/2016/8702162
                5081443
                27818792
                b74e1a61-2ed6-468f-8d85-3a8f4953bde1
                Copyright © 2016 Min-jie Ye et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 June 2016
                : 5 September 2016
                : 6 September 2016
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                Ophthalmology & Optometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article