21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Resolutividade dos serviços de saúde por inquérito domiciliar: percepção do usuário Translated title: Case-resolving capacity of health care services according to a household survey: users' perceptions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Estudo para identificar a capacidade resolutiva dos serviços de saúde utilizados pela população que referiu pelo menos um problema de saúde nos 15 dias anteriores à entrevista, e conhecer sua percepção sobre a resolução deste problema. As informações foram obtidas de inquérito domiciliar realizado com 10.199 entrevistados na região sudoeste da Grande São Paulo, Brasil, entre 1989/1990. Destes, 31,3% referiram algum episódio de doença e 47,7% procuraram ajuda para resolver o problema. O serviço de atenção primária à saúde foi a principal porta de entrada no sistema (35,7%), seguido pelos hospitais (25,4%) e clínicas/ambulatórios (24,3%). A capacidade resolutiva dos serviços para as consultas médicas foi superior a 90%; 44,5% referiram solução do problema de saúde, 35,5% estavam em tratamento e 10,5% não tiveram seu problema resolvido. A maioria dos problemas resolvidos pertencia ao capítulo das doenças dos aparelhos respiratório e digestivo, infecciosas e parasitárias e sinais e sintomas mal definidos. A proporção de indivíduos ainda em tratamento não permitiu concluir que os serviços eram resolutivos à época do inquérito, embora tenham sido capazes de atender à demanda.

          Translated abstract

          The objective of this study was to identify the case-resolving capacity of health care services used by individuals who reported a health problem within two weeks prior to the interview and to unveil their respective perceptions of the solution to the problem. Data were obtained from a household morbidity survey including 10,199 interviewees, performed in the southwestern area of the city of São Paulo, Brazil, in 1989/1990. Some health problem was reported by 31.3% of interviewees, and 47.7% sought help to solve their problem. Primary health services were the main gateway into the health system (35.7%), followed by hospitals (25.4%), and outpatient clinics (24.3%). The case-resolving capacity in the medical services was greater than 90%; 44.5% had their problem solved, 35.5% were under treatment, and 10.5% reported that their problem had not been solved. The largest proportion of problems solved belonged to respiratory and digestive system, infectious and parasitic diseases, and ill-defined symptoms, signs, and conditions. Due to the large proportion of individuals still in treatment, this study does not allow one to conclude that the health care services had a high case-resolving capacity, although they were capable of handling the patient demand.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain.

          Few treatments for back pain are supported by strong scientific evidence. Conventional treatments, although widely used, have had limited success. Dissatisfied patients have, therefore, turned to complementary and alternative medical therapies and providers for care for back pain. To provide a rigorous and balanced summary of the best available evidence about the effectiveness, safety, and costs of the most popular complementary and alternative medical therapies used to treat back pain. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Systematic reviews of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) that were published since 1995 and that evaluated acupuncture, massage therapy, or spinal manipulation for nonspecific back pain and RCTs published since the reviews were conducted. Two authors independently extracted data from the reviews (including number of RCTs, type of back pain, quality assessment, and conclusions) and original articles (including type of pain, comparison treatments, sample size, outcomes, follow-up intervals, loss to follow-up, and authors' conclusions). Because the quality of the 20 RCTs that evaluated acupuncture was generally poor, the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating acute or chronic back pain is unclear. The three RCTs that evaluated massage reported that this therapy is effective for subacute and chronic back pain. A meta-regression analysis of the results of 26 RCTs evaluating spinal manipulation for acute and chronic back pain reported that spinal manipulation was superior to sham therapies and therapies judged to have no evidence of a benefit but was not superior to effective conventional treatments. Initial studies have found massage to be effective for persistent back pain. Spinal manipulation has small clinical benefits that are equivalent to those of other commonly used therapies. The effectiveness of acupuncture remains unclear. All of these treatments seem to be relatively safe. Preliminary evidence suggests that massage, but not acupuncture or spinal manipulation, may reduce the costs of care after an initial course of therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A randomized controlled trial investigating the efficiency of musculoskeletal physiotherapy on chronic low back disorder.

            Randomized, single blind, controlled trial. To determine the efficacy of 2 components of musculoskeletal physiotherapy on chronic low back disorder. Musculoskeletal physiotherapy encompasses many treatment methods, however, manual therapy and exercises to rehabilitate spinal stabilization are the most frequently used. Despite their popularity, scant evidence supports their use on subjects with chronic low back disorder. A total of 346 subjects were randomized to manual therapy, a 10-week spinal stabilization rehabilitation program, or a minimal intervention control group. Data were collected at baseline, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after intervention. Outcome measures recorded intensity of low back pain, disability, handicap, medication, and quality of life. There were 4 main variables combined in a primary component analysis to form a single outcome measure (i.e., a measure of dysfunction). The results indicated statistically significant improvements in favor of the spinal stabilization group at the 6-month stage in pain (65.9% reduction in symptoms) and dysfunction (combined mean reduction of 134, standard error 23.84), and at the 1-year stage in medication (34.3% reduction in medication), dysfunction (combined mean reduction of 134, standard error 18.2), and disability (mean difference in change 15.71 Oswestry Disability Index, 95% confidence interval 19.3-10.01). As a component of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, the spinal stabilization program is more effective than manually applied therapy or an education booklet in treating chronic low back disorder over time. Both manual therapy and the spinal stabilization program are significantly effective in pain reduction in comparison to an active control. To our knowledge and up until now, this result has not been shown in patients with chronic low back disorder.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Operacionalização do conceito de classe social em estudos epidemiológicos

              Procura-se demonstrar que é possível operacionalizar o conceito de classe social de forma a utilizá-lo em estudos epidemiológicos. Foi adaptado às características da formação social de Pelotas, RS (Brasil), modelo de classificação desenvolvido para o México e comparado com o desenvolvido para Ribeirão Preto, SP (Brasil). Mediu-se o poder discriminatório das duas classificações em termos do processo saúde-doença, tendo como variável dependente o crescimento de 5.384 crianças nascidas em 1982. As duas classificações estão associadas com diferenças significativas (P<0,001) no crescimento infantil, mas o modelo do México mostra melhor poder discriminatório do que a classificação de Ribeirão Preto. Quando ambas foram incluídas em uma análise multivariada do peso e da altura das crianças, o efeito do modelo do México foi altamente significativo (P<0,001), ao contrário do efeito da classificação, modelo Ribeirão Preto.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                csp
                Cadernos de Saúde Pública
                Cad. Saúde Pública
                Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil )
                0102-311X
                1678-4464
                March 2008
                : 24
                : 3
                : 663-674
                Affiliations
                [01] orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Escola de Enfermagem Brasil
                [02] orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Faculdade de Saúde Pública Brasil
                Article
                S0102-311X2008000300020 S0102-311X(08)02400320
                10.1590/S0102-311X2008000300020
                18327454
                b730f810-ba67-4f93-a5d9-a6288437aa89

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 20 September 2007
                : 21 September 2006
                : 28 August 2007
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 20, Pages: 12
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI: Texto completo somente em PDF (PT)
                Categories
                Artigo

                Health Services,Morbidade,Avaliação de Resultados,Serviços de Saúde,Morbidity,Outcome Assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content451

                Cited by27

                Most referenced authors309