0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Farm forests, seasonal hunger, and biomass poverty: Evidence of induced intensification from panel data in the Ethiopian Highlands

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Seasonal hunger is the most common food insecurity experience for millions of small dryland farmers. This study tests the relationships between food insecurity, farm forests, and biomass poverty using a longitudinal dataset from the Amhara region of Ethiopia. These data form part of the Ethiopia Socioeconomic Survey, which collected panel data over three survey rounds from 530 households between 2011 and 2016. This dataset represents a collection of unique socioeconomic, wellbeing, and micro-land use measures, including farm forests. Hierarchical mixed effect regression models assessed the relationship between food insecurity and farm forests as well as the conditional effects of biomass poverty among the poorest farmers and women-headed households. Over a six-year study period, farmers reported increased stress from smaller land holdings, higher prices, and climate-related shocks. A clear trend towards spontaneous dispersed afforestation is observed by both researchers and satellite remote sensing. Model results indicate, dedicating approximately 10% of farm area to forest reduces months of food insecurity by half. The greatest reductions in food insecurity from farm forests are reported by ultra-poor and crop residue-burning households, suggesting that biomass poverty may be a major constraint to resilient food security on these farms. This research provides novel quantitative evidence of induced intensification and food security impacts of farm management preserving and building stores of biomass value as green assets. The results reported here have important implications for nature-based solutions as a major strategy to achieve sustainable development in some contexts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change.

          Quantification of global forest change has been lacking despite the recognized importance of forest ecosystem services. In this study, Earth observation satellite data were used to map global forest loss (2.3 million square kilometers) and gain (0.8 million square kilometers) from 2000 to 2012 at a spatial resolution of 30 meters. The tropics were the only climate domain to exhibit a trend, with forest loss increasing by 2101 square kilometers per year. Brazil's well-documented reduction in deforestation was offset by increasing forest loss in Indonesia, Malaysia, Paraguay, Bolivia, Zambia, Angola, and elsewhere. Intensive forestry practiced within subtropical forests resulted in the highest rates of forest change globally. Boreal forest loss due largely to fire and forestry was second to that in the tropics in absolute and proportional terms. These results depict a globally consistent and locally relevant record of forest change.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.

            A major problem worldwide is the potential loss of fisheries, forests, and water resources. Understanding of the processes that lead to improvements in or deterioration of natural resources is limited, because scientific disciplines use different concepts and languages to describe and explain complex social-ecological systems (SESs). Without a common framework to organize findings, isolated knowledge does not cumulate. Until recently, accepted theory has assumed that resource users will never self-organize to maintain their resources and that governments must impose solutions. Research in multiple disciplines, however, has found that some government policies accelerate resource destruction, whereas some resource users have invested their time and energy to achieve sustainability. A general framework is used to identify 10 subsystem variables that affect the likelihood of self-organization in efforts to achieve a sustainable SES.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nmorrow@tulane.edu
                agatto@kean.edu
                Journal
                Ambio
                Ambio
                Ambio
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0044-7447
                1654-7209
                15 December 2023
                15 December 2023
                March 2024
                : 53
                : 3
                : 435-451
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.265219.b, ISNI 0000 0001 2217 8588, Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, ; 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
                [2 ]Wenzhou-Kean University, ( https://ror.org/05609xa16) Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou, 325060 China
                [3 ]Centre for Studies on Europe, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), ( https://ror.org/000y2g343) Baku, Azerbaijan
                [4 ]Department of Agriculture and Forest Science, Università Della Tuscia, ( https://ror.org/03svwq685) 01100 Viterbo, Italy
                [5 ]Department of Methods and Models for Economics, Territory and Finance (MEMOTEF), Faculty of Economics, Sapienza University of Rome, ( https://ror.org/02be6w209) Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, I-0061 Rome, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1005-3571
                Article
                1954
                10.1007/s13280-023-01954-w
                10837407
                38100004
                b723ff8b-db02-4004-af79-2535aea2c92f
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 3 October 2022
                : 31 July 2023
                : 9 October 2023
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2024

                Sociology
                food security,food systems,nature-based solutions,panel data,resilience,sustainable intensification,i32,o13,q01,q16,q18,q23,q56

                Comments

                Comment on this article