28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Digestion: 3.0 Impact Factor I 7.9 CiteScore I 0.891 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Changing Paradigm for the Treatment of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Consensus Statements

      guideline

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert (APPLE) Consensus Statement on the treatment strategy for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was established on August 31, 2019, in Sapporo, Hokkaido during the 10th Annual APPLE Meeting. This manuscript summarizes the international consensus statements developed at APPLE 2019. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the only guideline-recommended global standard of care for intermediate-stage HCC. However, not all patients benefit from TACE because intermediate-stage HCC is a heterogeneous disease in terms of tumor burden and liver function. Ten important clinical questions regarding this stage of HCC were raised, and consensus statements were generated based on high-quality evidence. In intermediate-stage HCC, preservation of liver function is as important as achieving a high objective response (OR) because the treatment goal is to prolong overall survival. Superselective conventional TACE (cTACE) is recommended as the first choice of treatment in patients eligible for effective (curative) TACE, whereas in patients who are not eligible, systemic therapy is recommended as the first choice of treatment. TACE is not indicated as the first-line therapy in TACE-unsuitable patients. Another important statement is that TACE should not be continued in patients who develop TACE failure/refractoriness in order to preserve liver function. Targeted therapy is the recommended first-line treatment for TACE-unsuitable patients. Especially, the drug, which can have higher OR rate, is preferred. Immunotherapy, transarterial radioembolization, TACE + targeted therapy or other modalities may be considered alternative options in TACE-unsuitable patients who are not candidates for targeted therapy. Better liver function, such as albumin-bilirubin grade 1, is an important factor for maximizing the therapeutic effect of systemic therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

          VEGF and VEGF receptor-2-mediated angiogenesis contribute to hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis. Ramucirumab is a recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody and VEGF receptor-2 antagonist. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Randomised, multicentre prospective trial of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib as compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: TACTICS trial

            Objective This trial compared the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib with TACE alone using a newly established TACE-specific endpoint and pre-treatment of sorafenib before initial TACE. Design Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were randomised to TACE plus sorafenib (n=80) or TACE alone (n=76). Patients in the combination group received sorafenib 400 mg once daily for 2–3 weeks before TACE, followed by 800 mg once daily during on-demand conventional TACE sessions until time to untreatable (unTACEable) progression (TTUP), defined as untreatable tumour progression, transient deterioration to Child-Pugh C or appearance of vascular invasion/extrahepatic spread. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), which is not a conventional one but defined as TTUP, or time to any cause of death plus overall survival (OS). Multiplicity was adjusted by gatekeeping hierarchical testing. Results Median PFS was significantly longer in the TACE plus sorafenib than in the TACE alone group (25.2 vs 13.5 months; p=0.006). OS was not analysed because only 73.6% of OS events were reached. Median TTUP (26.7 vs 20.6 months; p=0.02) was also significantly longer in the TACE plus sorafenib group. OS at 1 year and 2 years in TACE plus sorafenib group and TACE alone group were 96.2% and 82.7% and 77.2% and 64.6%, respectively. There were no unexpected toxicities. Conclusion TACE plus sorafenib significantly improved PFS over TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC. Adverse events were consistent with those of previous TACE combination trials. Trial registration number NCT01217034.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan: Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) 2010 Updated Version

              Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death not only in Japan but also worldwide. Clinical practice guidelines for HCC were first published in 2001 by the European Society of Study of the Liver (EASL) followed by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) published in 2005 and updated in 2010. However, these guidelines have proven to be somewhat unsuitable for Japanese patients. In 2005, supported by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for HCC were compiled in Japan. In 2009, a revised version of evidence-based guidelines was published. Based on both ‘evidence-based’ guidelines and the consensus of an expert panel on HCC, the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) published the Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Manual in 2007 and updated in 2010. In this article, the 2010 updated version of this manual, especially issues on prevention, surveillance, pathology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment algorithm are summarized.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                LIC
                LIC
                10.1159/issn.1664-5553
                Liver Cancer
                S. Karger AG
                2235-1795
                1664-5553
                2020
                June 2020
                13 May 2020
                : 9
                : 3
                : 245-260
                Affiliations
                [_a] aDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
                [_b] bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [_c] cLiver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
                [_d] dDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
                [_e] eDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
                [_f] fInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
                [_g] gDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan
                [_h] hCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
                [_i] iDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Ren-Ai Branch and Kang Ning Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
                [_j] jDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa-shi, Japan
                [_k] kDepartment of Clinical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Translation Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
                [_l] lDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
                [_m] mDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan
                [_n] nDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
                [_o] oDepartment of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
                [_p] pGraduate Institute of Oncology, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
                Author notes
                *Masatoshi Kudo, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama 589-8511 (Japan), m-kudo@med.kindai.ac.jp
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4050-2086
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6119-5874
                Article
                507370 PMC7325125 Liver Cancer 2020;9:245–260
                10.1159/000507370
                PMC7325125
                32647629
                b7231091-466c-49fe-a2cb-ca5724f6f855
                © 2020 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 06 January 2020
                : 11 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 16
                Categories
                Consensus Statement

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Gastroenterology & Hepatology,Surgery,Nutrition & Dietetics,Internal medicine
                Systemic therapy,Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert,Intermediate stage,Transarterial chemoembolization,Hepatocellular carcinoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article