31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Negative symptoms and social cognition as mediators of the relationship between neurocognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          In this study we assessed the contribution of psychopathology, including the two domains of negative symptoms (motivational deficit and expressive deficit), processing speed as an index of neurocognition, and emotion recognition, as an index of social cognition, to poor functional outcomes in people with schizophrenia.

          Methods

          The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale was used to evaluate positive symptoms and disorganization and the Brief Negative Symptom Scale to assess negative symptoms. The Symbol Coding and the Trail Making Test A and B were used to rate processing speed and the Facial Emotion Identification Test to assess emotion recognition. Functional outcome was assessed with the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of functional outcome. Mediation analyses was used to investigate whether social cognition and negative symptom domains fully or partially mediated the impact of processing speed on functional outcome.

          Results

          One hundred and fifty subjects from 8 different European centers were recruited. Our data showed that the expressive deficit predicted global functioning and together with motivational deficit fully mediated the effects of neurocognition on it. Motivational deficit was a predictor of personal and social functioning and fully mediated neurocognitive impairment effects on the same outcome. Both motivational deficit and neurocognitive impairment predicted socially useful activities, and the emotion recognition domain of social cognition partially mediated the impact of neurocognitive deficits on this outcome.

          Conclusions

          Our results indicate that pathways to functional outcomes are specific for different domains of real-life functioning and that negative symptoms and social cognition mediate the impact of neurocognitive deficits on different domains of functioning. Our results suggest that both negative symptoms and social cognition should be targeted by psychosocial interventions to enhance the functional impact of neurocognitive remediation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references112

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for Schizophrenia

          The variable results of positive-negative research with schizophrenics underscore the importance of well-characterized, standardized measurement techniques. We report on the development and initial standardization of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for typological and dimensional assessment. Based on two established psychiatric rating systems, the 30-item PANSS was conceived as an operationalized, drug-sensitive instrument that provides balanced representation of positive and negative symptoms and gauges their relationship to one another and to global psychopathology. It thus constitutes four scales measuring positive and negative syndromes, their differential, and general severity of illness. Study of 101 schizophrenics found the four scales to be normally distributed and supported their reliability and stability. Positive and negative scores were inversely correlated once their common association with general psychopathology was extracted, suggesting that they represent mutually exclusive constructs. Review of five studies involving the PANSS provided evidence of its criterion-related validity with antecedent, genealogical, and concurrent measures, its predictive validity, its drug sensitivity, and its utility for both typological and dimensional assessment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

            Summary Background As mortality rates decline, life expectancy increases, and populations age, non-fatal outcomes of diseases and injuries are becoming a larger component of the global burden of disease. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016) provides a comprehensive assessment of prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) for 328 causes in 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2016. Methods We estimated prevalence and incidence for 328 diseases and injuries and 2982 sequelae, their non-fatal consequences. We used DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool, as the main method of estimation, ensuring consistency between incidence, prevalence, remission, and cause of death rates for each condition. For some causes, we used alternative modelling strategies if incidence or prevalence needed to be derived from other data. YLDs were estimated as the product of prevalence and a disability weight for all mutually exclusive sequelae, corrected for comorbidity and aggregated to cause level. We updated the Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a summary indicator of income per capita, years of schooling, and total fertility rate. GBD 2016 complies with the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER). Findings Globally, low back pain, migraine, age-related and other hearing loss, iron-deficiency anaemia, and major depressive disorder were the five leading causes of YLDs in 2016, contributing 57·6 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 40·8–75·9 million [7·2%, 6·0–8·3]), 45·1 million (29·0–62·8 million [5·6%, 4·0–7·2]), 36·3 million (25·3–50·9 million [4·5%, 3·8–5·3]), 34·7 million (23·0–49·6 million [4·3%, 3·5–5·2]), and 34·1 million (23·5–46·0 million [4·2%, 3·2–5·3]) of total YLDs, respectively. Age-standardised rates of YLDs for all causes combined decreased between 1990 and 2016 by 2·7% (95% UI 2·3–3·1). Despite mostly stagnant age-standardised rates, the absolute number of YLDs from non-communicable diseases has been growing rapidly across all SDI quintiles, partly because of population growth, but also the ageing of populations. The largest absolute increases in total numbers of YLDs globally were between the ages of 40 and 69 years. Age-standardised YLD rates for all conditions combined were 10·4% (95% UI 9·0–11·8) higher in women than in men. Iron-deficiency anaemia, migraine, Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and all musculoskeletal disorders apart from gout were the main conditions contributing to higher YLD rates in women. Men had higher age-standardised rates of substance use disorders, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancers, and all injuries apart from sexual violence. Globally, we noted much less geographical variation in disability than has been documented for premature mortality. In 2016, there was a less than two times difference in age-standardised YLD rates for all causes between the location with the lowest rate (China, 9201 YLDs per 100 000, 95% UI 6862–11943) and highest rate (Yemen, 14 774 YLDs per 100 000, 11 018–19 228). Interpretation The decrease in death rates since 1990 for most causes has not been matched by a similar decline in age-standardised YLD rates. For many large causes, YLD rates have either been stagnant or have increased for some causes, such as diabetes. As populations are ageing, and the prevalence of disabling disease generally increases steeply with age, health systems will face increasing demand for services that are generally costlier than the interventions that have led to declines in mortality in childhood or for the major causes of mortality in adults. Up-to-date information about the trends of disease and how this varies between countries is essential to plan for an adequate health-system response.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mediation analysis.

              Mediating variables are prominent in psychological theory and research. A mediating variable transmits the effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable. Differences between mediating variables and confounders, moderators, and covariates are outlined. Statistical methods to assess mediation and modern comprehensive approaches are described. Future directions for mediation analysis are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/829940Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1504202Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/103342Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1632069Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1100897Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1631925Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/675672Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1614955Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/130528Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/119160Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/600970Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/177345Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1522885Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/515720Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/680392Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                31 January 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1333711
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” , Naples, Italy
                [2] 2 Psychiatric Research Unit , Region Zealand Psychiatry, Slagelse, Denmark
                [3] 3 6th Psychiatric Department , Otto-Wagner-Spital, Vienna, Austria
                [4] 4 Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR) and Center for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CINS), Mental Health Center Glostrup , Glostrup, Denmark
                [5] 5 Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [6] 6 Medical University Innsbruck, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I , Innsbruck, Austria
                [7] 7 Department of Psychiatry, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové , Hradec Králové, Czechia
                [8] 8 NORMENT Centre, Institute of Clinical Psychiatry, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital , Oslo, Norway
                [9] 9 Department of Adult Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences , Poznan, Poland
                [10] 10 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                Author notes

                Edited by: Wing Chung Chang, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

                Reviewed by: Stefano Barlati, University of Brescia, Italy

                Cristiana Montemagni, Università Degli Studi di Torino, Italy

                Matthias Kirschner, University of Zurich, Switzerland

                *Correspondence: Armida Mucci, armida.mucci@ 123456gmail.com

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1333711
                10864497
                38356912
                b6e86a69-af68-4bfd-bf9b-64b2a16c9a84
                Copyright © 2024 Giordano, Pezzella, Mucci, Austin, Erfurth, Glenthøj, Hofer, Hubenak, Libiger, Melle, Nielsen, Rybakowski, Wojciak, Galderisi and Sachs

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 05 November 2023
                : 15 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 113, Pages: 14, Words: 6755
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) supported the network standalone meetings during which the protocol was designed and results discussed by the involved researchers.
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Schizophrenia

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                schizophrenia,negative symptoms,expressive deficit,motivational deficit,emotion recognition,processing speed,mediation analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content138

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors3,856