484
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    10
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Amiloride inhibits macropinocytosis by lowering submembranous pH and preventing Rac1 and Cdc42 signaling

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Inhibitors of Na +/H + exchange proteins block macropinocytosis by lowering the pH near the plasma membrane, which in turn inhibits actin remodeling by Rho family GTPases.

          Abstract

          Macropinocytosis is differentiated from other types of endocytosis by its unique susceptibility to inhibitors of Na +/H + exchange. Yet, the functional relationship between Na +/H + exchange and macropinosome formation remains obscure. In A431 cells, stimulation by EGF simultaneously activated macropinocytosis and Na +/H + exchange, elevating cytosolic pH and stimulating Na + influx. Remarkably, although inhibition of Na +/H + exchange by amiloride or HOE-694 obliterated macropinocytosis, neither cytosolic alkalinization nor Na + influx were required. Instead, using novel probes of submembranous pH, we detected the accumulation of metabolically generated acid at sites of macropinocytosis, an effect counteracted by Na +/H + exchange and greatly magnified when amiloride or HOE-694 were present. The acidification observed in the presence of the inhibitors did not alter receptor engagement or phosphorylation, nor did it significantly depress phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase stimulation. However, activation of the GTPases that promote actin remodelling was found to be exquisitely sensitive to the submembranous pH. This sensitivity confers to macropinocytosis its unique susceptibility to inhibitors of Na +/H + exchange.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion

          The GTPases Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42 act in concert to control cytoskeleton dynamics1-3. Recent biosensor studies have shown that all three GTPases are activated at the front of migrating cells4-7 and biochemical evidence suggests that they may regulate one another: Cdc42 can activate Rac18, and Rac1 and RhoA are mutually inhibitory9-12. However, their spatiotemporal coordination, at the seconds and single micron dimensions typical of individual protrusion events, remains unknown. Here, we examine GTPase coordination both through simultaneous visualization of two GTPase biosensors and using a “computational multiplexing” approach capable of defining the relationships between multiple protein activities visualized in separate experiments. We found that RhoA is activated at the cell edge synchronous with edge advancement, whereas Cdc42 and Rac1 are activated 2 μm behind the edge with a delay of 40 sec. This indicates that Rac1 and RhoA operate antagonistically through spatial separation and precise timing, and that RhoA plays a role in the initial events of protrusion, while Rac1 and Cdc42 activate pathways implicated in reinforcement and stabilization of newly expanded protrusions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Membrane phosphatidylserine regulates surface charge and protein localization.

            Electrostatic interactions with negatively charged membranes contribute to the subcellular targeting of proteins with polybasic clusters or cationic domains. Although the anionic phospholipid phosphatidylserine is comparatively abundant, its contribution to the surface charge of individual cellular membranes is unknown, partly because of the lack of reagents to analyze its distribution in intact cells. We developed a biosensor to study the subcellular distribution of phosphatidylserine and found that it binds the cytosolic leaflets of the plasma membrane, as well as endosomes and lysosomes. The negative charge associated with the presence of phosphatidylserine directed proteins with moderately positive charge to the endocytic pathway. More strongly cationic proteins, normally associated with the plasma membrane, relocalized to endocytic compartments when the plasma membrane surface charge decreased on calcium influx.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity in migrating cells.

              Rho family GTPases regulate the actin and adhesion dynamics that control cell migration. Current models postulate that Rac promotes membrane protrusion at the leading edge and that RhoA regulates contractility in the cell body. However, there is evidence that RhoA also regulates membrane protrusion. Here we use a fluorescent biosensor, based on a novel design preserving reversible membrane interactions, to visualize the spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity during cell migration. In randomly migrating cells, RhoA activity is concentrated in a sharp band directly at the edge of protrusions. It is observed sporadically in retracting tails, and is low in the cell body. RhoA activity is also associated with peripheral ruffles and pinocytic vesicles, but not with dorsal ruffles induced by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). In contrast to randomly migrating cells, PDGF-induced membrane protrusions have low RhoA activity, potentially because PDGF strongly activates Rac, which has previously been shown to antagonize RhoA activity. Our data therefore show that different extracellular cues induce distinct patterns of RhoA signalling during membrane protrusion.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J. Cell Biol
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                The Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                22 February 2010
                : 188
                : 4
                : 547-563
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cell Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
                [3 ]Laboratory of Physiology, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Yada 52-1, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan
                [4 ]Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva - Sciences II 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
                [5 ]Department of Pediatrics and Physiology and [6 ]Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Sergio Grinstein: sga@ 123456sickkids.ca
                Article
                200908086
                10.1083/jcb.200908086
                2828922
                20156964
                b6d05827-0eab-4c0b-99c8-de8c8622611d
                © 2010 Koivusalo et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.jcb.org/misc/terms.shtml). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

                History
                : 17 August 2009
                : 25 January 2010
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article