0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient‐Led Research to Develop a Training Programme for Restoring Musical Joy in Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Reflexive Process Evaluation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          The role of patients in healthcare research is slowly evolving, although patient roles in the research process are limited. This paper reports on a patient‐led research project aiming to develop a musical hearing training programme for patients with a cochlear implant (CI): the Musi‐CI programme. A CI is an inner ear prosthesis that allows people with severe hearing loss to hear. However, while speech can be understood, CI users cannot fully enjoy music or feel aversion to it. The Musi‐CI programme aims to reduce this music aversion to ultimately improve music enjoyment and social participation. The development of the Musi‐CI programme was supported by a consortium of professionals in CI rehabilitation and research.

          The aim of this paper is to describe and evaluate the Musi‐CI programme development process and its impact on professional CI rehabilitation and research.

          Methods

          Programme development was described using a 3‐layered process model of action research, distinguishing the CI user process, the healthcare professional process and the research process. To evaluate perceptions on the programme development process, consortium partners provided written comments and participated in a reflexive evaluation session that was video‐recorded. Reflexive evaluation aims for collective learning and strengthening collaboration among participants. Written comments and video data were analysed using template analysis.

          Results

          The involvement of an expert by experience was perceived as challenging but rewarding for all consortium partners, opening up new perspectives on CI‐rehabilitation practice and research. Data analysis revealed two themes on the programme development process, professional space and acknowledgement, and two themes on the outcomes on CI rehabilitation and research: critical reflection and paradigm shift.

          Conclusion

          Experts by experience represent a different knowledge domain that may contribute to change in rehabilitation and research.

          Patient or Public Contribution

          The development of the programme was initiated by a professional musician and CI user who organized the funding, had a leading role throughout the research process, including the write‐up of the results, and co‐authored this paper.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Patient engagement in research: a systematic review

          Background A compelling ethical rationale supports patient engagement in healthcare research. It is also assumed that patient engagement will lead to research findings that are more pertinent to patients’ concerns and dilemmas. However; it is unclear how to best conduct this process. In this systematic review we aimed to answer 4 key questions: what are the best ways to identify patient representatives? How to engage them in designing and conducting research? What are the observed benefits of patient engagement? What are the harms and barriers of patient engagement? Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Cochrane, EBSCO, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Business Search Premier, Academic Search Premier and Google Scholar. Included studies were published in English, of any size or design that described engaging patients or their surrogates in research design. We conducted an environmental scan of the grey literature and consulted with experts and patients. Data were analyzed using a non-quantitative, meta-narrative approach. Results We included 142 studies that described a spectrum of engagement. In general, engagement was feasible in most settings and most commonly done in the beginning of research (agenda setting and protocol development) and less commonly during the execution and translation of research. We found no comparative analytic studies to recommend a particular method. Patient engagement increased study enrollment rates and aided researchers in securing funding, designing study protocols and choosing relevant outcomes. The most commonly cited challenges were related to logistics (extra time and funding needed for engagement) and to an overarching worry of a tokenistic engagement. Conclusions Patient engagement in healthcare research is likely feasible in many settings. However, this engagement comes at a cost and can become tokenistic. Research dedicated to identifying the best methods to achieve engagement is lacking and clearly needed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            How should we define health?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The use of tacit and explicit knowledge in public health: a qualitative study

              Background Planning a public health initiative is both a science and an art. Public health practitioners work in a complex, often time-constrained environment, where formal research literature can be unavailable or uncertain. Consequently, public health practitioners often draw upon other forms of knowledge. Methods Through use of one-on-one interviews and focus groups, we aimed to gain a better understanding of how tacit knowledge is used to inform program initiatives in public health. This study was designed as a narrative inquiry, which is based on the assumption that we make sense of the world by telling stories. Four public health units were purposively selected for maximum variation, based on geography and academic affiliation. Results Analysis revealed different ways in which tacit knowledge was used to plan the public health program or initiative, including discovering the opportunity, bringing a team together, and working out program details (such as partnering, funding). Conclusions The findings of this study demonstrate that tacit knowledge is drawn upon, and embedded within, various stages of the process of program planning in public health. The results will be useful in guiding the development of future knowledge translation strategies for public health organizations and decision makers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Marjo.Maas@radboudumc.nl
                Journal
                Health Expect
                Health Expect
                10.1111/(ISSN)1369-7625
                HEX
                Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1369-6513
                1369-7625
                10 July 2024
                August 2024
                : 27
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/hex.v27.4 )
                : e14133
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Radboudumc IQ Health Radboud University Nijmegen the Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Department Allied Health Sciences HAN University of Applied Sciences Nijmegen the Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Stichting Musi‐CI Breda the Netherlands
                [ 4 ] Department of Otorhinolaryngology Radboudumc Nijmegen the Netherlands
                [ 5 ] Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour Radboud University Nijmegen the Netherlands
                [ 6 ] Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery UMC Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands
                [ 7 ] School of Business and Economics, Management and Organisation VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands
                [ 8 ] UMC Utrecht Brain Center Utrecht the Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Marjo J. M. Maas ( Marjo.Maas@ 123456radboudumc.nl )

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9851-3108
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-5446
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2881-5159
                http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7431-1678
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-4657
                http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2257-3670
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1273-6456
                http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3293-9874
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7417-5546
                Article
                HEX14133
                10.1111/hex.14133
                11236901
                38988044
                b6a0c3f0-abde-4943-974b-ffca809b6b91
                © 2024 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 May 2024
                : 30 December 2023
                : 20 June 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Pages: 8, Words: 5816
                Funding
                Funded by: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                August 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.5 mode:remove_FC converted:11.07.2024

                Health & Social care
                action research,cochlear implants,patient empowerment,patient involvement
                Health & Social care
                action research, cochlear implants, patient empowerment, patient involvement

                Comments

                Comment on this article