3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Surgical Intervention for Adhesive Small-Bowel Obstruction With the Risk of Recurrence

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Is operative intervention for adhesive small-bowel obstruction associated with long-term risk of recurrence? In this propensity-matched study using population-level data of 27 904 patients, operative intervention for a patient’s first episode of adhesive small-bowel obstruction significantly reduced the probability of recurrence (13.0% vs 21.3%). The risk of additional recurrences increased with each episode until surgical intervention, at which point the risk of subsequent recurrence decreased by approximately 50%. The current standard for the management of adhesive small-bowel obstruction, which advocates a trial of nonoperative management, may not consider the long-term consequences of nonoperative management. This population-based cohort study assesses the incidence of recurrence after an index episode of adhesive small-bowel obstruction to determine whether operative vs nonoperative management is associated with the risk of recurrence among patients in hospital administrative databases. Adhesive small-bowel obstruction (aSBO) is a potentially chronic, recurring surgical illness. Although guidelines suggest trials of nonoperative management, the long-term association of this approach with recurrence is poorly understood. To compare the incidence of recurrence of aSBO in patients undergoing operative management at their first admission compared with nonoperative management. This longitudinal, propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study used health administrative data for the province of Ontario, Canada, for patients treated from April 1, 2005, through March 31, 2014. The study population included adults aged 18 to 80 years who were admitted for their first episode of aSBO. Patients with nonadhesive causes of SBO were excluded. A total of 27 904 patients were included and matched 1:1 by their propensity to undergo surgery. Factors used to calculate propensity included patient age, sex, comorbidity burden, socioeconomic status, and rurality of home residence. Data were analyzed from September 10, 2017, through October 4, 2018. Operative vs nonoperative management for aSBO. The primary outcome was the rate of recurrence of aSBO among those with operative vs nonoperative management. Time-to-event analyses were used to estimate hazard ratios of recurrence while accounting for the competing risk of death. Of 27 904 patients admitted with their first episode of aSBO, 6186 (22.2%) underwent operative management. Mean (SD) patient age was 61.2 (13.6) years, and 51.1% (14 228 of 27 904) were female. Patients undergoing operative management were younger (mean [SD] age, 60.2 [14.3] vs 61.5 [13.4] years) with fewer comorbidities (low burden, 382 [6.2%] vs 912 [4.2%]). After matching, those with operative management had a lower risk of recurrence (13.0% vs 21.3%; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.56-0.68; P  < .001). The 5-year probability of experiencing another recurrence increased with each episode until surgical intervention, at which point the risk of subsequent recurrence decreased by approximately 50%. According to this study, operative management of the first episode of aSBO is associated with significantly reduced risk of recurrence. Guidelines advocating trials of nonoperative management for aSBO may assume that surgery increases the risk of recurrence putatively through the formation of additional adhesions. The long-term risk of recurrence of aSBO should be considered in the management of this patient population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix.

          This article describes a new case-mix methodology applicable primarily to the ambulatory care sector. The Ambulatory Care Group (ACG) system provides a conceptually simple, statistically valid, and clinically relevant measure useful in predicting the utilization of ambulatory health services within a particular population group. ACGs are based on a person's demographic characteristics and their pattern of disease over an extended period of time, such as a year. Specifically, the ACG system is driven by a person's age, sex, and ICD-9-CM diagnoses assigned during patient-provider encounters; it does not require any special data beyond those collected routinely by insurance claims systems or encounter forms. The categorization scheme does not depend on the presence of specific diagnoses that may change over time; rather it is based on broad clusters of diagnoses and conditions. The presence or absence of each disease cluster, along with age and sex, are used to classify a person into one of 51 ACG categories. The ACG system has been developed and tested using computerized encounter and claims data from more than 160,000 continuous enrollees at four large HMOs and a state's Medicaid program. The ACG system can explain more than 50% of the variance in ambulatory resource use if used retrospectively and more than 20% if applied prospectively. This compares with 6% when age and sex alone are used. In addition to describing ACG development and validation, this article also explores some potential applications of the system for provider payment, quality assurance, utilization review, and health services research, particularly as it relates to capitated settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions.

            Peritoneal adhesions represent an important clinical challenge in gastrointestinal surgery. Peritoneal adhesions are a consequence of peritoneal irritation by infection or surgical trauma, and may be considered as the pathological part of healing following any peritoneal injury, particularly due to abdominal surgery. The balance between fibrin deposition and degradation is critical in determining normal peritoneal healing or adhesion formation. Postoperative peritoneal adhesions are a major cause of morbidity resulting in multiple complications, many of which may manifest several years after the initial surgical procedure. In addition to acute small bowel obstruction, peritoneal adhesions may cause pelvic or abdominal pain, and infertility. In this paper, the authors reviewed the epidemiology, pathogenesis and various prevention strategies of adhesion formation, using Medline and PubMed search. Several preventive agents against postoperative peritoneal adhesions have been investigated. Their role aims in activating fibrinolysis, hampering coagulation, diminishing the inflammatory response, inhibiting collagen synthesis or creating a barrier between adjacent wound surfaces. Their results are encouraging but most of them are contradictory and achieved mostly in animal model. Until additional findings from future clinical researches, only a meticulous surgery can be recommended to reduce unnecessary morbidity and mortality rates from these untoward effects of surgery. In the current state of knowledge, pre-clinical or clinical studies are still necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the several proposed prevention strategies of postoperative peritoneal adhesions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Hierarchical Logistic Regression Model for Multilevel Analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Surgery
                JAMA Surg
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2168-6254
                January 30 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Article
                10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5248
                6537786
                30698610
                b6844e0f-c01b-4f12-904d-a5a67060bf7c
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article