19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Circadian Plasticity in the Brain of Insects and Rodents

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In both vertebrate and invertebrate brains, neurons, glial cells and synapses are plastic, which means that the physiology and structure of these components are modified in response to internal and external stimuli during development and in mature brains. The term plasticity has been introduced in the last century to describe experience-dependent changes in synapse strength and number. These changes result from local functional and morphological synapse modifications; however, these modifications also occur more commonly in pre- and postsynaptic neurons. As a result, neuron morphology and neuronal networks are constantly modified during the life of animals and humans in response to different stimuli. Nevertheless, it has been discovered in flies and mammals that the number of synapses and size and shape of neurons also oscillate during the day. In most cases, these rhythms are circadian since they are generated by endogenous circadian clocks; however, some rhythmic changes in neuron morphology and synapse number and structure are controlled directly by environmental cues or by both external cues and circadian clocks. When the circadian clock is involved in generating cyclic changes in the nervous system, this type of plasticity is called circadian plasticity. It seems to be important in processing sensory information, in learning and in memory. Disruption of the clock may affect major brain functions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references170

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Extensive and divergent circadian gene expression in liver and heart.

          Many mammalian peripheral tissues have circadian clocks; endogenous oscillators that generate transcriptional rhythms thought to be important for the daily timing of physiological processes. The extent of circadian gene regulation in peripheral tissues is unclear, and to what degree circadian regulation in different tissues involves common or specialized pathways is unknown. Here we report a comparative analysis of circadian gene expression in vivo in mouse liver and heart using oligonucleotide arrays representing 12,488 genes. We find that peripheral circadian gene regulation is extensive (> or = 8-10% of the genes expressed in each tissue), that the distributions of circadian phases in the two tissues are markedly different, and that very few genes show circadian regulation in both tissues. This specificity of circadian regulation cannot be accounted for by tissue-specific gene expression. Despite this divergence, the clock-regulated genes in liver and heart participate in overlapping, extremely diverse processes. A core set of 37 genes with similar circadian regulation in both tissues includes candidates for new clock genes and output genes, and it contains genes responsive to circulating factors with circadian or diurnal rhythms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Loss of a circadian adrenal corticosterone rhythm following suprachiasmatic lesions in the rat.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A pdf neuropeptide gene mutation and ablation of PDF neurons each cause severe abnormalities of behavioral circadian rhythms in Drosophila.

              The mechanisms by which circadian pacemaker systems transmit timing information to control behavior are largely unknown. Here, we define two critical features of that mechanism in Drosophila. We first describe animals mutant for the pdf neuropeptide gene, which is expressed by most of the candidate pacemakers (LNv neurons). Next, we describe animals in which pdf neurons were selectively ablated. Both sets of animals produced similar behavioral phenotypes. Both sets entrained to light, but both were largely arrhythmic under constant conditions. A minority of each pdf variant exhibited weak to moderate free-running rhythmicity. These results confirm the assignment of LNv neurons as the principal circadian pacemakers controlling daily locomotion in Drosophila. They also implicate PDF as the principal circadian transmitter.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neural Circuits
                Front Neural Circuits
                Front. Neural Circuits
                Frontiers in Neural Circuits
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5110
                02 May 2018
                2018
                : 12
                : 32
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University , Krakow, Poland
                [2] 2Department of Neurophysiology and Chronobiology, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University , Krakow, Poland
                [3] 3Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences , Krakow, Poland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mark A. Frye, University of California, Los Angeles, United States

                Reviewed by: Sufia Sadaf, University of California, Los Angeles, United States; Michael T. Sellix, University of Rochester, United States

                *Correspondence: Elżbieta Pyza elzbieta.pyza@ 123456uj.edu.pl
                Article
                10.3389/fncir.2018.00032
                5942159
                29770112
                b62932a0-9b4a-4ed7-a9d2-21200819938a
                Copyright © 2018 Krzeptowski, Hess and Pyza.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 November 2017
                : 09 April 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 181, Pages: 14, Words: 11973
                Funding
                Funded by: Seventh Framework Programme 10.13039/100011102
                Award ID: 316790
                Funded by: Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie 10.13039/501100007088
                Award ID: K/ZDS/007356
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review

                Neurosciences
                circadian rhythm,circadian clock,synaptic plasticity,neural plasticity,drosophila melanogaster,mice,rat

                Comments

                Comment on this article