52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Radioembolization of Hepatic Lesions from a Radiobiology and Dosimetric Perspective

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Radioembolization (RE) of liver cancer with 90Y-microspheres has been applied in the last two decades with notable responses and acceptable toxicity. Two types of microspheres are available, glass and resin, the main difference being the activity/sphere. Generally, administered activities are established by empirical methods and differ for the two types. Treatment planning based on dosimetry is a prerogative of few centers, but has notably gained interest, with evidence of predictive power of dosimetry on toxicity, lesion response, and overall survival (OS). Radiobiological correlations between absorbed doses and toxicity to organs at risk, and tumor response, have been obtained in many clinical studies. Dosimetry methods have evolved from the macroscopic approach at the organ level to voxel analysis, providing absorbed dose spatial distributions and dose–volume histograms (DVH). The well-known effects of the external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), such as the volume effect, underlying disease influence, cumulative damage in parallel organs, and different tolerability of re-treatment, have been observed also in RE, identifying in EBRT a foremost reference to compare with. The radiobiological models – normal tissue complication probability and tumor control probability – and/or the style (DVH concepts) used in EBRT are introduced in RE. Moreover, attention has been paid to the intrinsic different activity distribution of resin and glass spheres at the microscopic scale, with dosimetric and radiobiological consequences. Dedicated studies and mathematical models have developed this issue and explain some clinical evidences, e.g., the shift of dose to higher toxicity thresholds using glass as compared to resin spheres. This paper offers a comprehensive review of the literature incident to dosimetry and radiobiological issues in RE, with the aim to summarize the results and to identify the most useful methods and information that should accompany future studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic.

            The Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) review summarizes the currently available three-dimensional dose/volume/outcome data to update and refine the normal tissue dose/volume tolerance guidelines provided by the classic Emami et al. paper published in 1991. A "clinician's view" on using the QUANTEC information in a responsible manner is presented along with a description of the most commonly used normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. A summary of organ-specific dose/volume/outcome data, based on the QUANTEC reviews, is included. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                17 June 2014
                19 August 2014
                2014
                : 4
                : 210
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Istituto Europeo di Oncologia , Milan, Italy
                [2] 2Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori , Milan, Italy
                [3] 3Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Regina Elena , Rome, Italy
                [4] 4Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona , Cremona, Italy
                [5] 5Istituto Candiolo – IRCCS , Candiolo, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Georgios S. Limouris, Athens University Medical Faculty, Greece

                Reviewed by: Luigi Aloj, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale, Italy; Georgios S. Limouris, Athens University Medical Faculty, Greece

                *Correspondence: Marta Cremonesi, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, via Ripamonti, 435, Milano 20141, Italy e-mail: marta.cremonesi@ 123456ieo.it

                This article was submitted to Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology.

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2014.00210
                4137387
                25191640
                b5f3361e-6a2b-4737-ab78-11f6a80ca543
                Copyright © 2014 Cremonesi, Chiesa, Strigari, Ferrari, Botta, Guerriero, De Cicco, Bonomo, Orsi, Bodei, Di Dia, Grana and Orecchia.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 03 April 2014
                : 23 July 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Equations: 12, References: 102, Pages: 20, Words: 18814
                Categories
                Oncology
                Review Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                radioembolization,liver tumors,90y-microspheres,dosimetry,radiobiology
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                radioembolization, liver tumors, 90y-microspheres, dosimetry, radiobiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article