0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Circulating Tumor DNA Analyses as Markers of Recurrence Risk and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer

          Can serial analysis of circulating tumor DNA levels provide a real-time indication of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in patients with stage III colon cancer? In this multicenter cohort study of 96 patients with stage III colon cancer, a significant difference in 3-year recurrence-free interval was observed in patients with detectable vs undetectable levels of circulating tumor DNA after surgery (47% vs 76%) and after completion of chemotherapy (30% vs 77%). Postsurgical and postchemotherapy circulating tumor DNA analyses may identify patients at high risk of recurrence despite completing standard adjuvant treatment, presenting a unique opportunity to explore additional therapeutic approaches. This multicenter cohort study assesses whether serial postsurgical and postchemotherapy analyses of circulating tumor DNA levels could provide a real-time indication of adjuvant therapy efficacy in patients with stage III colon cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer prevents recurrence by eradicating minimal residual disease. However, which patients remain at high risk of recurrence after completing standard adjuvant treatment cannot currently be determined. Postsurgical circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis can detect minimal residual disease and is associated with recurrence in colorectal cancers. To determine whether serial postsurgical and postchemotherapy ctDNA analysis could provide a real-time indication of adjuvant therapy efficacy in stage III colon cancer. This multicenter, Australian, population-based cohort biomarker study recruited 100 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed stage III colon cancer planned for 24 weeks of adjuvant chemotherapy from November 1, 2014, through May 31, 2017. Patients with another malignant neoplasm diagnosed within the last 3 years were excluded. Median duration of follow-up was 28.9 months (range, 11.6-46.4 months). Physicians were blinded to ctDNA results. Data were analyzed from December 10, 2018, through June 23, 2019. Serial plasma samples were collected after surgery and after chemotherapy. Somatic mutations in individual patients’ tumors were identified via massively parallel sequencing of 15 genes commonly mutated in colorectal cancer. Personalized assays were designed to quantify ctDNA. Detection of ctDNA and recurrence-free interval (RFI). After 4 exclusions, 96 eligible patients were eligible; median patient age was 64 years (range, 26-82 years); 49 (51%) were men. At least 1 somatic mutation was identified in the tumor tissue of all 96 evaluable patients. Circulating tumor DNA was detectable in 20 of 96 (21%) postsurgical samples and was associated with inferior recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; 95% CI, 2.4-21.0; P  < .001). Circulating tumor DNA was detectable in 15 of 88 (17%) postchemotherapy samples. The estimated 3-year RFI was 30% when ctDNA was detectable after chemotherapy and 77% when ctDNA was undetectable (HR, 6.8; 95% CI, 11.0-157.0; P  < .001). Postsurgical ctDNA status remained independently associated with RFI after adjusting for known clinicopathologic risk factors (HR, 7.5; 95% CI, 3.5-16.1; P  < .001). Results suggest that ctDNA analysis after surgery is a promising prognostic marker in stage III colon cancer. Postchemotherapy ctDNA analysis may define a patient subset that remains at high risk of recurrence despite completing standard adjuvant treatment. This high-risk population presents a unique opportunity to explore additional therapeutic approaches.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Circulating tumor DNA dynamics and recurrence risk in patients undergoing curative intent resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: A prospective cohort study

            Background In patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), the role of pre- and postoperative systemic therapy continues to be debated. Previous studies have shown that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, as a marker of minimal residual disease, is a powerful prognostic factor in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Serial analysis of ctDNA in patients with resectable CRLM could inform the optimal use of perioperative chemotherapy. Here, we performed a validation study to confirm the prognostic impact of postoperative ctDNA in resectable CRLM observed in a previous discovery study. Methods and findings We prospectively collected plasma samples from patients with resectable CRLM, including presurgical and postsurgical samples, serial samples during any pre- or postoperative chemotherapy, and serial samples in follow-up. Via targeted sequencing of 15 genes commonly mutated in CRC, we identified at least 1 somatic mutation in each patient’s tumor. We then designed a personalized assay to assess 1 mutation in plasma samples using the Safe-SeqS assay. A total of 380 plasma samples from 54 patients recruited from July 2011 to Dec 2014 were included in our analysis. Twenty-three (43%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 42 patients (78%) received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Median follow-up was 51 months (interquartile range, 31 to 60 months). At least 1 somatic mutation was identified in all patients’ tumor tissue. ctDNA was detectable in 46/54 (85%) patients prior to any treatment and 12/49 (24%) patients after surgery. There was a median 40.93-fold (19.10 to 87.73, P < 0.001) decrease in ctDNA mutant allele fraction with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but ctDNA clearance during neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a better recurrence-free survival (RFS). Patients with detectable postoperative ctDNA experienced a significantly lower RFS (HR 6.3; 95% CI 2.58 to 15.2; P < 0.001) and overall survival (HR 4.2; 95% CI 1.5 to 11.8; P < 0.001) compared to patients with undetectable ctDNA. For the 11 patients with detectable postoperative ctDNA who had serial ctDNA sampling during adjuvant chemotherapy, ctDNA clearance was observed in 3 patients, 2 of whom remained disease-free. All 8 patients with persistently detectable ctDNA after adjuvant chemotherapy have recurred. End-of-treatment (surgery +/− adjuvant chemotherapy) ctDNA detection was associated with a 5-year RFS of 0% compared to 75.6% for patients with an undetectable end-of-treatment ctDNA (HR 14.9; 95% CI 4.94 to 44.7; P < 0.001). Key limitations of the study include the small sample size and the potential for false-positive findings with multiple hypothesis testing. Conclusions We confirmed the prognostic impact of postsurgery and posttreatment ctDNA in patients with resected CRLM. The potential utility of serial ctDNA analysis during adjuvant chemotherapy as an early marker of treatment efficacy was also demonstrated. Further studies are required to define how to optimally integrate ctDNA analyses into decision-making regarding the use and timing of adjuvant therapy for resectable CRLM. Trial registration ACTRN12612000345886 . Why was this study done? Recurrence risk remains high in patients who underwent curative-intent surgical resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), with limited additional benefit from pre- or postoperative chemotherapy. There is currently no validated biomarker of recurrence for resected CRLM that could help guide the use of chemotherapy for the individual patient. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), representing DNA shed from tumor cells into the circulation, is a versatile blood-based biomarker that can provide real-time assessment of cancer burden. It has been shown in a previous small study of 18 patients that ctDNA detection after surgery for CRLM is highly predictive of eventual cancer relapse. What did the researchers do and find? We performed a larger study involving 54 patients with resectable CRLM to confirm the ability of postoperative ctDNA to detect microscopic residual disease and predict relapse. We also analysed serial ctDNA during and after chemotherapy. ctDNA was detected in 24% of patients immediately after surgery, and these patients had a very high recurrence risk of 83% compared to only 31% in those with undetectable ctDNA after surgery. All patients with detectable postoperative ctDNA who failed to clear their ctDNA following adjuvant chemotherapy experienced recurrence, while 67% of patients whose ctDNA became undetectable after chemotherapy remained disease-free. What do these findings mean? ctDNA detection after surgery or after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a very high risk of recurrence and death in patients with resectable CRLM; ctDNA dynamics before and after adjuvant chemotherapy reflected adjuvant treatment efficacy. Future studies should aim to assess how best to incorporate ctDNA testing into clinical practice to guide adjuvant treatment decision.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of KRAS mutations and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

              In patients with advanced colorectal cancer, KRAS mutation status predicts response to treatment with monoclonal antibody targeting the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR). Recent reports have provided evidence that KRAS mutation status has prognostic value in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) irrespective of treatment with chemotherapy or anti-EGFR therapy. A meta-analysis was undertaken to clarify the impact of KRAS mutation on outcomes in patients with resectable CLM.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr
                Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr
                HBSN
                Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition
                AME Publishing Company
                2304-3881
                2304-389X
                07 July 2023
                01 August 2023
                : 12
                : 4
                : 595-597
                Affiliations
                [1]University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Hassan Aziz, MD. Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, C41-S GH52242, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Email: hassan-aziz@ 123456uiowa.edu .
                Article
                hbsn-12-04-595
                10.21037/hbsn-23-270
                10432297
                37601003
                b5c4b6b6-9aee-44cb-acba-194b30b8acb9
                2023 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved.

                Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.

                History
                : 28 May 2023
                : 21 June 2023
                Categories
                Editorial Commentary

                colorectal liver metastases (crlm),liver transplant,international hepato-pancreato-biliary association,transplant oncology

                Comments

                Comment on this article