10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Biases in lake water quality sampling and implications for macroscale research : Biases in studying and monitoring lakes

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A trophic state index for lakes1

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Eutrophication science: where do we go from here?

            Cultural eutrophication has become the primary water quality issue for most of the freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems in the world. However, despite extensive research during the past four to five decades, many key questions in eutrophication science remain unanswered. Much is yet to be understood concerning the interactions that can occur between nutrients and ecosystem stability: whether they are stable or not, alternate states pose important complexities for the management of aquatic resources. Evidence is also mounting rapidly that nutrients strongly influence the fate and effects of other non-nutrient contaminants, including pathogens. In addition, it will be important to resolve ongoing debates about the optimal design of nutrient loading controls as a water quality management strategy for estuarine and coastal marine ecosystems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Eutrophication of U.S. Freshwaters: Analysis of Potential Economic Damages

              Human-induced eutrophication degrades freshwater systems worldwide by reducing water quality and altering ecosystem structure and function. We compared current total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP) concentrations for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency nutrient ecoregions with estimated reference conditions. In all nutrient ecoregions, current median TN and TP values for rivers and lakes exceeded reference median values. In 12 of 14 ecoregions, over 90% of rivers currently exceed reference median values. We calculated potential annual value losses in recreational water usage, waterfront real estate, spending on recovery of threatened and endangered species, and drinking water. The combined costs were approximately $2.2 billion annually as a result of eutrophication in U.S. freshwaters. The greatest economic losses were attributed to lakefront property values ($0.3-2.8 billion per year, although this number was poorly constrained) and recreational use ($0.37-1.16 billion per year). Our evaluation likely underestimates economic losses incurred from freshwater eutrophication. We document potential costs to identify where restoring natural nutrient regimes can have the greatest economic benefits. Our research exposes gaps in current records (e.g., accounting for frequency of algal blooms and fish kills) and suggests further research is necessary to refine cost estimates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Limnology and Oceanography
                Limnol. Oceanogr.
                Wiley
                00243590
                July 2019
                July 2019
                February 11 2019
                : 64
                : 4
                : 1572-1585
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Limnology; University of Wisconsin; Madison Wisconsin
                [2 ]Department of Zoology and Physiology; University of Wyoming; Laramie Wyoming
                [3 ]Center for Limnology, Trout Lake Station; University of Wisconsin; Boulder Junction Wisconsin
                [4 ]Water Science Center; USGS Wisconsin; Middleton Wisconsin
                [5 ]Department of Fisheries and Wildlife; Michigan State University; East Lansing Michigan
                [6 ]Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Lyman Briggs College; Michigan State University; East Lansing Michigan
                Article
                10.1002/lno.11136
                b5c044f5-1008-473b-90ef-ba0baec43f54
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#am

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article