Functional hyperconnectivity related to brain disease: maladaptive process or element of resilience?

A common finding in human functional brain-imaging studies is that damage to neural systems paradoxically results in enhanced functional connectivity between network regions, a phenomenon commonly referred to as 'hyperconnectivity'. Here, we describe the various ways that hyperconnectivity operates to benefit a neural network following injury while simultaneously negotiating the trade-off between metabolic cost and communication efficiency. Hyperconnectivity may be optimally expressed by increasing connections through the most central and metabolically efficient regions (i.e., hubs). While adaptive in the short term, we propose that chronic hyperconnectivity may leave network hubs vulnerable to secondary pathological processes over the life span due to chronically elevated metabolic stress. We conclude by offering novel, testable hypotheses for advancing our understanding of the role of hyperconnectivity in systems-level brain plasticity in neurological disorders.

Remodeling of neuronal structures and networks is believed to significantly contribute to (partial) restoration of functions after stroke. However, it has been unclear to what extent the brain reorganizes and how this correlates with functional recovery in relation to stroke severity. We applied serial resting-state functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging together with behavioral testing to relate longitudinal modifications in functional and structural connectivity of the sensorimotor neuronal network to changes in sensorimotor function after unilateral stroke in rats. We found that gradual improvement of functions is associated with wide-ranging changes in functional and structural connectivity within bilateral neuronal networks, particularly after large stroke. Both after medium and large stroke, brain reorganization eventually leads to (partial) normalization of neuronal signal synchronization within the affected sensorimotor cortical network (intraregional signal coherence), as well as between the affected and unaffected sensorimotor cortices (interhemispheric functional connectivity). Furthermore, the bilateral network configuration shifts from subacutely increased "small-worldness," possibly reflective of initial excessive neuronal clustering and wiring, toward a baseline small-world topology, optimal for global information transfer and local processing, at chronic stages. Cortical network remodeling was accompanied by recovery of initially disrupted structural integrity in corticospinal tract regions, which correlated positively with retrieval of sensorimotor functions. Our study demonstrates that the degree of functional recovery after stroke is associated with the extent of preservation or restoration of ipsilesional corticospinal tracts in combination with reinstatement of interhemispheric neuronal signal synchronization and normalization of small-world cortical network organization.

Low-frequency oscillations reflect brain injury but also contribute to normal behaviors. We examined hypotheses relating electroencephalography measures, including low-frequency oscillations, to injury and motor recovery poststroke. Patients with stroke completed structural neuroimaging, a resting-state electroencephalography recording and clinical testing. A subset admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility also underwent serial electroencephalography recordings. The relationship that electroencephalography measures (power and coherence with leads overlying ipsilesional primary motor cortex [iM1]) had with injury and motor status was assessed, focusing on delta (1–3 Hz) and high-beta (20–30 Hz) bands. Across all patients (n=62), larger infarct volume was related to higher delta band power in bilateral hemispheres and to higher delta band coherence between iM1 and bilateral regions. In chronic stroke, higher delta power bilaterally correlated with better motor status. In subacute stroke, higher delta coherence between iM1 and bilateral areas correlated with poorer motor status. These coherence findings were confirmed in serial recordings from 18 patients in an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Here, interhemispheric coherence between leads overlying iM1 and contralesional M1 was elevated at inpatient rehabilitation facility admission compared with healthy controls (n=22), declining to control levels over time. Decreases in interhemispheric coherence between iM1 and contralesional M1 correlated with better motor recovery. Delta band coherence with iM1 related to greater injury and poorer motor status subacutely, while delta band power related to greater injury and better motor status chronically. Low-frequency oscillations reflect both injury and recovery after stroke and may be useful biomarkers in stroke recovery and rehabilitation.