8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      No Strong Leaders Needed? AfD Party Organisation Between Collective Leadership, Internal Democracy, and “Movement-Party” Strategy

      ,
      Politics and Governance
      Cogitatio

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article analyses the formal and lived organisation of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD, Alternative for Germany). We show that the party is exceptional among what is usually understood as the populist radical right (PRR) party family, at least from an organisational perspective: The AfD sharply contradicts the “standard model” of PRR party organisation, which emphasises “charismatic” leadership and the centralisation of power as key features. Instead, studying the AfD’s efforts to adopt some elements of a mass-party organisation and its relatively decentralised decision-making underlines the importance of “movement-party” strategy, collective leadership, and internal democracy—concepts that are usually associated with Green and left-wing parties. Our analysis shows how the party’s organisation is essential for understanding its development more broadly as it reflects and reinforces sharp intra-party conflict. From this perspective, the case of the AfD sheds new light on the relationship between PRR party organisation and electoral success, indicating the importance of strong ties to parts of society over effective internal management as long as demand for anti-immigration parties is high. We conclude that even though AfD quickly built up a relatively inclusive organisational structure, the role of both its leadership and its rank-and-file is still a matter of controversy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe

          Cas Mudde (2007)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Inside the Radical Right

            David Art (2011)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government

              The article compares analytically populism and technocracy as alternative forms of political representation to party government. It argues that populist and technocratic principles of representation challenge fundamental features of party democracy. The two alternative forms of representation are addressed theoretically from the perspective of political representation. First, the article identifies the commonalities between the two forms of representation: both populism and technocracy are based on a unitary, nonpluralist, unmediated, and unaccountable vision of society's general interest. Second, it highlights their differences. Technocracy stresses responsibility and requires voters to entrust authority to experts who identify the general interest from rational speculation. Populism stresses responsiveness and requires voters to delegate authority to leaders who equate the general interest with a putative will of the people. While the populist form of representation has received considerable attention, the technocratic one has been neglected. The article presents a more complete picture of the analytical relationship between them.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Politics and Governance
                PaG
                Cogitatio
                2183-2463
                November 24 2021
                November 24 2021
                : 9
                : 4
                : 263-274
                Article
                10.17645/pag.v9i4.4530
                b53f465d-ed81-4580-bc54-388b03d16306
                © 2021

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article