20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Complementing the Cancer-Immunity Cycle

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Reactivation of cytotoxic CD8 + T-cell responses has set a new direction for cancer immunotherapy. Neutralizing antibodies targeting immune checkpoint programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) have been particularly successful for tumor types with limited therapeutic options such as melanoma and lung cancer. However, reactivation of T cells is only one step toward tumor elimination, and a substantial fraction of patients fails to respond to these therapies. In this context, combination therapies targeting more than one of the steps of the cancer-immune cycle may provide significant benefits. To find the best combinations, it is of upmost importance to understand the interplay between cancer cells and all the components of the immune response. This review focuses on the elements of the complement system that come into play in the cancer-immunity cycle. The complement system, an essential part of innate immunity, has emerged as a major regulator of cancer immunity. Complement effectors such as C1q, anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a, and their receptors C3aR and C5aR1, have been associated with tolerogenic cell death and inhibition of antitumor T-cell responses through the recruitment and/or activation of immunosuppressive cell subpopulations such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs), or M2 tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Evidence is provided to support the idea that complement blocks many of the effector routes associated with the cancer-immunity cycle, providing the rationale for new therapeutic combinations aimed to enhance the antitumor efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references105

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Where, the When, and the How of Immune Monitoring for Cancer Immunotherapies in the Era of Checkpoint Inhibition.

          Clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors have provided important insights into the mode of action of anticancer immune therapies and potential mechanisms of immune escape. Development of the next wave of rational clinical combination strategies will require a deep understanding of the mechanisms by which combination partners influence the battle between the immune system's capabilities to fight cancer and the immune-suppressive processes that promote tumor growth. This review focuses on our current understanding of tumor and circulating pharmacodynamic correlates of immune modulation and elaborates on lessons learned from human translational research with checkpoint inhibitors. Actionable tumor markers of immune activation including CD8(+)T cells, PD-L1 IHC as a pharmacodynamic marker of T-cell function, T-cell clonality, and challenges with conduct of trials that ask scientific questions from serial biopsies are addressed. Proposals for clinical trial design, as well as future applications of peripheral pharmacodynamic endpoints as potential surrogates of early clinical activity, are discussed. On the basis of emerging mechanisms of response and immune escape, we propose the concept of the tumor immunity continuum as a framework for developing rational combination strategies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Immunosuppression mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) during tumour progression

            Under steady-state conditions, bone marrow-derived immature myeloid cells (IMC) differentiate into granulocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs). This differentiation is impaired under chronic inflammatory conditions, which are typical for tumour progression, leading to the accumulation of IMCs. These cells are capable of inducing strong immunosuppressive effects through the expression of various cytokines and immune regulatory molecules, inhibition of lymphocyte homing, stimulation of other immunosuppressive cells, depletion of metabolites critical for T cell functions, expression of ectoenzymes regulating adenosine metabolism, and the production of reactive species. IMCs are therefore designated as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and have been shown to accumulate in tumour-bearing mice and cancer patients. MDSCs are considered to be a strong contributor to the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment and thus an obstacle for many cancer immunotherapies. Consequently, numerous studies are focused on the characterisation of MDSC origin and their relationship to other myeloid cell populations, their immunosuppressive capacity, and possible ways to inhibit MDSC function with different approaches being evaluated in clinical trials. This review analyses the current state of knowledge on the origin and function of MDSCs in cancer, with a special emphasis on the immunosuppressive pathways pursued by MDSCs to inhibit T cell functions, resulting in tumour progression. In addition, we describe therapeutic strategies and clinical benefits of MDSC targeting in cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Homozygous C1q deficiency causes glomerulonephritis associated with multiple apoptotic bodies.

              The complement system plays a paradoxical role in the development and expression of autoimmunity in humans. The activation of complement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) contributes to tissue injury. In contrast, inherited deficiency of classical pathway components, particularly C1q (ref. 1), is powerfully associated with the development of SLE. This leads to the hypothesis that a physiological action of the early part of the classical pathway protects against the development of SLE (ref. 2) and implies that C1q may play a key role in this respect. C1q-deficient (C1qa-/-) mice were generated by gene targeting and monitored for eight months. C1qa-/- mice had increased mortality and higher titres of autoantibodies, compared with strain-matched controls. Of the C1qa-/- mice, 25% had glomerulonephritis with immune deposits and multiple apoptotic cell bodies. Among mice without glomerulonephritis, there were significantly greater numbers of glomerular apoptotic bodies in C1q-deficient mice compared with controls. The phenotype associated with C1q deficiency was modified by background genes. These findings are compatible with the hypothesis that C1q deficiency causes autoimmunity by impairment of the clearance of apoptotic cells.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                12 April 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 774
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Program in Solid Tumors (CIMA) and Department of Biochemistry and Genetics (School of Medicine), University of Navarra , Pamplona, Spain
                [2] 2Navarra Institute for Health Research (IDISNA) , Pamplona, Spain
                [3] 3Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC) , Madrid, Spain
                [4] 4Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University , Milan, Italy
                [5] 5William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London , London, United Kingdom
                [6] 6Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Carlo Pucillo, University of Udine, Italy

                Reviewed by: Martin V. Kolev, GlaxoSmithKline, United Kingdom; Peter Monk, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom; Viktor Umansky, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany

                *Correspondence: Ruben Pio rpio@ 123456unav.es

                This article was submitted to Molecular Innate Immunity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2019.00774
                6473060
                31031765
                b4c58739-7a4d-449c-95a0-01c39295ab0e
                Copyright © 2019 Pio, Ajona, Ortiz-Espinosa, Mantovani and Lambris.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 February 2019
                : 25 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 145, Pages: 12, Words: 10015
                Funding
                Funded by: Fundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer 10.13039/501100002704
                Funded by: Fundación Ramón Areces 10.13039/100008054
                Funded by: Instituto de Salud Carlos III 10.13039/501100004587
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Funded by: Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro 10.13039/501100005010
                Funded by: Ministero della Salute 10.13039/501100003196
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review

                Immunology
                cancer immunity,immunotherapy,complement system,c3a,c5a,c1q,pd-1,pd-l1
                Immunology
                cancer immunity, immunotherapy, complement system, c3a, c5a, c1q, pd-1, pd-l1

                Comments

                Comment on this article