19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          False claims about COVID-19 vaccines can undermine public trust in ongoing vaccination campaigns, posing a threat to global public health. Misinformation originating from various sources has been spreading on the web since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Antivaccine activists have also begun to use platforms such as Twitter to promote their views. To properly understand the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy through the lens of social media, it is of great importance to gather the relevant data.

          Objective

          In this paper, we describe a data set of Twitter posts and Twitter accounts that publicly exhibit a strong antivaccine stance. The data set is made available to the research community via our AvaxTweets data set GitHub repository. We characterize the collected accounts in terms of prominent hashtags, shared news sources, and most likely political leaning.

          Methods

          We started the ongoing data collection on October 18, 2020, leveraging the Twitter streaming application programming interface (API) to follow a set of specific antivaccine-related keywords. Then, we collected the historical tweets of the set of accounts that engaged in spreading antivaccination narratives between October 2020 and December 2020, leveraging the Academic Track Twitter API. The political leaning of the accounts was estimated by measuring the political bias of the media outlets they shared.

          Results

          We gathered two curated Twitter data collections and made them publicly available: (1) a streaming keyword–centered data collection with more than 1.8 million tweets, and (2) a historical account–level data collection with more than 135 million tweets. The accounts engaged in the antivaccination narratives lean to the right (conservative) direction of the political spectrum. The vaccine hesitancy is fueled by misinformation originating from websites with already questionable credibility.

          Conclusions

          The vaccine-related misinformation on social media may exacerbate the levels of vaccine hesitancy, hampering progress toward vaccine-induced herd immunity, and could potentially increase the number of infections related to new COVID-19 variants. For these reasons, understanding vaccine hesitancy through the lens of social media is of paramount importance. Because data access is the first obstacle to attain this goal, we published a data set that can be used in studying antivaccine misinformation on social media and enable a better understanding of vaccine hesitancy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fast unfolding of communities in large networks

          Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world

            Misinformation about COVID-19 is a major threat to public health. Using five national samples from the UK (n = 1050 and n = 1150), Ireland (n = 700), the USA (n = 700), Spain (n = 700) and Mexico (n = 700), we examine predictors of belief in the most common statements about the virus that contain misinformation. We also investigate the prevalence of belief in COVID-19 misinformation across different countries and the role of belief in such misinformation in predicting relevant health behaviours. We find that while public belief in misinformation about COVID-19 is not particularly common, a substantial proportion views this type of misinformation as highly reliable in each country surveyed. In addition, a small group of participants find common factual information about the virus highly unreliable. We also find that increased susceptibility to misinformation negatively affects people's self-reported compliance with public health guidance about COVID-19, as well as people's willingness to get vaccinated against the virus and to recommend the vaccine to vulnerable friends and family. Across all countries surveyed, we find that higher trust in scientists and having higher numeracy skills were associated with lower susceptibility to coronavirus-related misinformation. Taken together, these results demonstrate a clear link between susceptibility to misinformation and both vaccine hesitancy and a reduced likelihood to comply with health guidance measures, and suggest that interventions which aim to improve critical thinking and trust in science may be a promising avenue for future research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predictors of Intention to Vaccinate Against COVID-19: Results of a Nationwide Survey

              Highlights • Nationwide survey finds that nearly two in five adults reported hesitancy about getting a COVID-19 vaccine when one becomes available. • Significant demographic predictors of intent to vaccinate included being male, older, white, non-Hispanic, married, and higher socio-economic status. • Democrats were more likely to vaccinate than Republicans, and social media users had weaker vaccination intentions than nonusers. • Health predictors of intent to vaccinate included having multiple pre-existing conditions and being currently immunized against influenza. • COVID-19 vaccine promotion requires formative research into the concerns of hesitant people.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Public Health Surveill
                JMIR Public Health Surveill
                JPH
                JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2369-2960
                November 2021
                17 November 2021
                17 November 2021
                : 7
                : 11
                : e30642
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Information Sciences Institute University of Southern California Marina del Rey, CA United States
                [2 ] Department of Computer Science University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA United States
                [3 ] Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Goran Muric gmuric@ 123456isi.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3700-2347
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6692-3607
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-2831
                Article
                v7i11e30642
                10.2196/30642
                8694238
                34653016
                b4c056c5-345f-4361-8a09-42efda99acb2
                ©Goran Muric, Yusong Wu, Emilio Ferrara. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 17.11.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 23 May 2021
                : 5 August 2021
                : 26 August 2021
                : 12 October 2021
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                vaccine hesitancy,covid-19 vaccines,dataset,covid-19,sars-cov-2,social media,network analysis,hesitancy,vaccine,twitter,misinformation,conspiracy,trust,public health,utilization

                Comments

                Comment on this article