0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Priorities for quality of life after traumatic brain injury

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          After traumatic brain injury (TBI), individuals can experience changes to quality of life (QOL). Despite understanding the factors that impact QOL after TBI, there is limited patient-oriented research to understand the subjective priorities for QOL after TBI. This study aims to understand the priorities for QOL after TBI using a group consensus building method.

          Methods

          The Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts (TRIAGE) method was used to determine priorities for QOL after TBI. In phase one, expert participants were consulted to understand the context of QOL after TBI. In phase two, participants with TBI completed a questionnaire to broadly determine the factors that contributed to their QOL. In phase three, a portion of participants from phase two engaged in focus groups to identify the most relevant priorities. Data was analyzed thematically. In phase four, expert participants were consulted to finalize the priorities.

          Results

          Phase one included three expert participants who outlined the complexity and importance of QOL after TBI. Phase two included 34 participants with TBI who described broad priorities for QOL including social support, employment, and accessible environments. Phase three included 13 participants with TBI who identified seven priorities for QOL: ensuring basic needs are met, participating in everyday life, trusting a circle of care, being seen and accepted, finding meaning in relationships, giving back and advocating, and finding purpose and value. In phase four, four expert participants confirmed the QOL priorities.

          Interpretations

          Findings emphasize the critical need to address priorities for QOL after TBI to ensure improved health outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview.

          Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important public health problem in the United States and worldwide. The estimated 5.3 million Americans living with TBI-related disability face numerous challenges in their efforts to return to a full and productive life. This article presents an overview of the epidemiology and impact of TBI.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization.

            This paper describes the World Health Organization's project to develop a quality of life instrument (the WHOQOL). It outlines the reasons that the project was undertaken, the thinking that underlies the project, the method that has been followed in its development and the current status of the project. The WHOQOL assesses individuals' perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns. It has been developed collaboratively in several culturally diverse centres over four years. Piloting of the WHOQOL on some 4500 respondents in 15 cultural settings has been completed. On the basis of this data the revised WHOQOL Field Trial Form has been finalized, and field testing is currently in progress. The WHOQOL produces a multi-dimensional profile of scores across six domains and 24 sub-domains of quality of life.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: A Transactive Approach to Occupational Performance

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                5 July 2024
                2024
                : 19
                : 7
                : e0306524
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Rehabilitation Science Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
                [2 ] Rehabilitation Research Program, Centre for Aging SMART at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada
                [3 ] Nanaimo Brain Injury Society, Nanaimo, Canada
                [4 ] British Columbia Brain Injury Association, Vancouver, Canada
                [5 ] The Cridge Centre for the Family, Victoria, Canada
                [6 ] CGB Centre for Traumatic Life Losses, Victoria, Canada
                [7 ] Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
                University of Sharjah College of Health Sciences, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8476-4409
                Article
                PONE-D-23-43247
                10.1371/journal.pone.0306524
                11226113
                38968208
                b4a75af0-ade8-4206-b0f8-095e68c85406
                © 2024 Grewal et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 5 January 2024
                : 19 June 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004489, Mitacs;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000204, Vancouver Foundation;
                Award Recipient :
                This study was funded by the MITACS Accelerate Grant and the Vancouver Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                Trauma Medicine
                Traumatic Injury
                Neurotrauma
                Traumatic Brain Injury
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Behavioral and Social Aspects of Health
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Collective Human Behavior
                Interpersonal Relationships
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Collective Human Behavior
                Interpersonal Relationships
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Finance
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Brain Damage
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Social Psychology
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Social Psychology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Quality of Life
                Custom metadata
                The datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to data containing potentially identifying and sensitive participant information imposed by the Research Ethics Board. Reasonable data access requests can be considered by the University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board and the corresponding author ( Julia.schmidt@ 123456ubc.ca ). Alternatively, for data access, please email the operations team of our research centre, the Centre for Aging Smart. The email is: aging.smart@ 123456ubc.ca .

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article