64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Food security in a perfect storm: using the ecosystem services framework to increase understanding

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Achieving food security in a ‘perfect storm’ scenario is a grand challenge for society. Climate change and an expanding global population act in concert to make global food security even more complex and demanding. As achieving food security and the millennium development goal (MDG) to eradicate hunger influences the attainment of other MDGs, it is imperative that we offer solutions which are complementary and do not oppose one another. Sustainable intensification of agriculture has been proposed as a way to address hunger while also minimizing further environmental impact. However, the desire to raise productivity and yields has historically led to a degraded environment, reduced biodiversity and a reduction in ecosystem services (ES), with the greatest impacts affecting the poor. This paper proposes that the ES framework coupled with a policy response framework, for example Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR), can allow food security to be delivered alongside healthy ecosystems, which provide many other valuable services to humankind. Too often, agro-ecosystems have been considered as separate from other natural ecosystems and insufficient attention has been paid to the way in which services can flow to and from the agro-ecosystem to surrounding ecosystems. Highlighting recent research in a large multi-disciplinary project (ASSETS), we illustrate the ES approach to food security using a case study from the Zomba district of Malawi.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.

          The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) introduced a new framework for analyzing social-ecological systems that has had wide influence in the policy and scientific communities. Studies after the MA are taking up new challenges in the basic science needed to assess, project, and manage flows of ecosystem services and effects on human well-being. Yet, our ability to draw general conclusions remains limited by focus on discipline-bound sectors of the full social-ecological system. At the same time, some polices and practices intended to improve ecosystem services and human well-being are based on untested assumptions and sparse information. The people who are affected and those who provide resources are increasingly asking for evidence that interventions improve ecosystem services and human well-being. New research is needed that considers the full ensemble of processes and feedbacks, for a range of biophysical and social systems, to better understand and manage the dynamics of the relationship between humans and the ecosystems on which they rely. Such research will expand the capacity to address fundamental questions about complex social-ecological systems while evaluating assumptions of policies and practices intended to advance human well-being through improved ecosystem services.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes.

            A key challenge of ecosystem management is determining how to manage multiple ecosystem services across landscapes. Enhancing important provisioning ecosystem services, such as food and timber, often leads to tradeoffs between regulating and cultural ecosystem services, such as nutrient cycling, flood protection, and tourism. We developed a framework for analyzing the provision of multiple ecosystem services across landscapes and present an empirical demonstration of ecosystem service bundles, sets of services that appear together repeatedly. Ecosystem service bundles were identified by analyzing the spatial patterns of 12 ecosystem services in a mixed-use landscape consisting of 137 municipalities in Quebec, Canada. We identified six types of ecosystem service bundles and were able to link these bundles to areas on the landscape characterized by distinct social-ecological dynamics. Our results show landscape-scale tradeoffs between provisioning and almost all regulating and cultural ecosystem services, and they show that a greater diversity of ecosystem services is positively correlated with the provision of regulating ecosystem services. Ecosystem service-bundle analysis can identify areas on a landscape where ecosystem management has produced exceptionally desirable or undesirable sets of ecosystem services.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of 'ecoagriculture' landscapes.

              The dominant late twentieth century model of land use segregated agricultural production from areas managed for biodiversity conservation. This module is no longer adequate in much of the world. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment confirmed that agriculture has dramatically increased its ecological footprint. Rural communities depend on key components of biodiversity and ecosystem services that are found in non-domestic habitats. Fortunately, agricultural landscapes can be designed and managed to host wild biodiversity of many types, with neutral or even positive effects on agricultural production and livelihoods. Innovative practitioners, scientists and indigenous land managers are adapting, designing and managing diverse types of 'ecoagriculture' landscapes to generate positive co-benefits for production, biodiversity and local people. We assess the potentials and limitations for successful conservation of biodiversity in productive agricultural landscapes, the feasibility of making such approaches financially viable, and the organizational, governance and policy frameworks needed to enable ecoagriculture planning and implementation at a globally significant scale. We conclude that effectively conserving wild biodiversity in agricultural landscapes will require increased research, policy coordination and strategic support to agricultural communities and conservationists.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci
                RSTB
                royptb
                Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8436
                1471-2970
                5 April 2014
                5 April 2014
                : 369
                : 1639 , Discussion Meeting Issue ‘Achieving food and environmental security: new approaches to close the gap’ organized and edited by Guy Poppy, Paul Jepson, John Pickett and Michael Birkett
                : 20120288
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton , Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
                [2 ]Centre for Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton , Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
                [3 ]Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton , Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
                [4 ]LEAD, Chancellor College, University of Malawi , Zomba, Malawi
                [5 ]Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science and Oceans , Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, USA
                [6 ]International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) , CALI AA6317, Colombia
                [7 ]Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University , Grahamstown, South Africa
                [8 ]Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science , Bilbao 48008, Spain
                [9 ]School of the Environment, University of Dundee , Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
                Author notes

                One contribution of 16 to a Discussion Meeting Issue ‘ Achieving food and environmental security: new approaches to close the gap’.

                Article
                rstb20120288
                10.1098/rstb.2012.0288
                3928891
                24535394
                b4a58848-20d5-4c5b-90d9-09f5db5e45f9

                © 2014 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                Categories
                60
                69
                204
                206
                205
                Articles
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                April 5, 2014

                Philosophy of science
                agriculture–forest interface,ecosystem services,food security,malawi,models

                Comments

                Comment on this article