2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quantitative analysis of metal artifact reduction in total hip arthroplasty using virtual monochromatic imaging and orthopedic metal artifact reduction, a phantom study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To quantify metal artifact reduction using 130 keV virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) with and without orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) in total hip arthroplasty.

          Methods

          Conventional polychromatic images and 130 keV VMI of a phantom with pellets representing bone with unilateral or bilateral prostheses were reconstructed with and without O-MAR on a dual-layer CT. Pellets were categorized as unaffected, mildly affected and severely affected.

          Results

          When 130 keV VMI with O-MAR was compared to conventional imaging with O-MAR, a relative metal artifact reduction in CT values, contrast-to-noise (CNR), signal-to-noise (SNR) and noise in mildly affected pellets (67%, 74%, 48%, 68%, respectively; p < 0.05) was observed but no significant relative metal artifact reduction in severely affected pellets. Comparison between 130 keV VMI without O-MAR and conventional imaging with O-MAR showed relative metal artifact reduction in CT values, CNR, SNR and noise in mildly affected pellets (92%, 72%, 38%, 51%, respectively; p < 0.05) but negative relative metal artifact reduction in CT values and noise in severely affected pellets (− 331% and -223%, respectively; p < 0.05), indicating aggravation of metal artifacts.

          Conclusion

          Overall, VMI of 130 keV with O-MAR provided the strongest metal artifact reduction.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-021-01111-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Radiological Demarcation of Cemented Sockets in Total Hip Replacement

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT.

            At magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and multidetector computed tomography (CT), artifacts arising from metallic orthopedic hardware are an obstacle to obtaining optimal images. Although various techniques for reducing such artifacts have been developed and corroborated by previous researchers, a new era of more powerful MR imaging and multidetector CT modalities has renewed the importance of a systematic consideration of methods for artifact reduction. Knowledge of the factors that contribute to artifacts, of related theories, and of artifact reduction techniques has become mandatory for radiologists. Factors that affect artifacts on MR images include the composition of the metallic hardware, the orientation of the hardware in relation to the direction of the main magnetic field, the strength of the magnetic field, the pulse sequence type, and other MR imaging parameters (mainly voxel size, which is determined by the field of view, image matrix, section thickness, and echo train length). At multidetector CT, the factors that affect artifacts include the composition of the hardware, orientation of the hardware, acquisition parameters (peak voltage, tube charge, collimation, and acquired section thickness), and reconstruction parameters (reconstructed section thickness, reconstruction algorithm used, and whether an extended CT scale was used). A comparison of images obtained with different hardware and different acquisition and reconstruction parameters facilitates an understanding of methods for reducing or overcoming artifacts related to metallic implants. (c) RSNA, 2007.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Current and Novel Techniques for Metal Artifact Reduction at CT: Practical Guide for Radiologists

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m.selles@isala.nl
                Journal
                Insights Imaging
                Insights Imaging
                Insights into Imaging
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1869-4101
                24 November 2021
                24 November 2021
                December 2021
                : 12
                : 171
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.452600.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0547 5927, Department of Radiology, , Isala, ; 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.509540.d, ISNI 0000 0004 6880 3010, Department of Radiology, , Amsterdam University Medical Centre, ; 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]GRID grid.452600.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0547 5927, Department of Medical Physics, , Isala, ; 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.7692.a, ISNI 0000000090126352, Department of Radiology, , University Medical Centre Utrecht, ; 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-1438
                Article
                1111
                10.1186/s13244-021-01111-5
                8613319
                34817722
                b499b95e-af1f-4203-abce-a58e4c8fa554
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 4 June 2021
                : 18 October 2021
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Radiology & Imaging
                arthroplasty,replacement,hip,ct,dual energy
                Radiology & Imaging
                arthroplasty, replacement, hip, ct, dual energy

                Comments

                Comment on this article