8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Nonmulberry Silk Fibroin Scaffold Shows Superior Osteoconductivity Than Mulberry Silk Fibroin in Calvarial Bone Regeneration.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent years have witnessed the advancement of silk biomaterials in bone tissue engineering, although clinical application of the same is still in its infancy. In this study, the potential of pure nonmulberry Antheraea mylitta (Am) fibroin scaffold, without preloading with bone precursor cells, to repair calvarial bone defect in a rat model is explored and compared with its mulberry counterpart Bombyx mori (Bm) silk fibroin. After 3 months of implantation, Am scaffold culminates in a completely ossified regeneration with a progressive increase in mineralization at the implanted site. On the other hand, the Bm scaffold fails to repair the damaged bone, presumably due to its low osteoconductivity and early degradation. The deposition of bone matrix on scaffolds is evaluated by scanning electron and atomic force microscopy. These results are corroborated by in vitro studies of enzymatic degradation, colony formation, and secondary conformational features of the scaffold materials. The greater biocompatibility and mineralization in pure nonmulberry fibroin scaffolds warrants the use of these scaffolds as an "ideal bone graft" biomaterial for effective repair of critical size defects.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Adv Healthc Mater
          Advanced healthcare materials
          Wiley
          2192-2659
          2192-2640
          Aug 05 2015
          : 4
          : 11
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi-110067, India.
          [2 ] Department of Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110016, India.
          [3 ] Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal-721302, India.
          [4 ] Biozentrum and Swiss Nanoscience Institute, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 70, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
          Article
          10.1002/adhm.201500283
          26084249
          b474a177-7018-4f00-a7b0-ce9842208d35
          History

          nonmulberry silk,mulberry silk,calvarial bone defect,bone regeneration,bone graft materials,biodegradation

          Comments

          Comment on this article