7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      α‐particle therapy for synovial sarcoma in the mouse using an astatine‐211‐labeled antibody against frizzled homolog 10

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Synovial sarcoma ( SS) is a rare yet refractory soft‐tissue sarcoma that predominantly affects young adults. We show in a mouse model that radioimmunotherapy ( RIT) with an α‐particle emitting anti‐Frizzled homolog 10 ( FZD10) antibody, synthesized using the α‐emitter radionuclide astatine‐211 ( 211At‐ OTSA101), suppresses the growth of SS xenografts more efficiently than the corresponding β‐particle emitting anti‐ FZD10 antibody conjugated with the β‐emitter yettrium‐90 ( 90Y‐ OTSA101). In biodistribution analysis, 211At was increased in the SS xenografts but decreased in other tissues up to 1 day after injection as time proceeded, albeit with a relatively higher uptake in the stomach. Single 211At‐ OTSA101 doses of 25 and 50 μCi significantly suppressed SS tumor growth in vivo, whereas a 50‐μCi dose of 90Y‐ OTSA101 was needed to achieve this. Importantly, 50 μCi of 211At‐ OTSA101 suppressed tumor growth immediately after injection, whereas this effect required several days in the case of 90Y‐ OTSA101. Both radiolabeled antibodies at the 50‐μCi dosage level significantly prolonged survival. Histopathologically, severe cellular damage accompanied by massive cell death was evident in the SS xenografts at even 1 day after the 211At‐ OTSA101 injection, but these effects were relatively milder with 90Y‐ OTSA101 at the same timepoint, even though the absorbed doses were comparable (3.3 and 3.0 Gy, respectively). We conclude that α‐particle RIT with 211At‐ OTSA101 is a potential new therapeutic option for SS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Identification of novel genes, SYT and SSX, involved in the t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) translocation found in human synovial sarcoma.

          Human synovial sarcomas contain a recurrent and specific chromosomal translocation t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2). By screening a synovial sarcoma cDNA library with a yeast artificial chromosome spanning the X chromosome breakpoint, we have identified a hybrid transcript that contains 5' sequences (designated SYT) mapping to chromosome 18 and 3' sequences (designated SSX) mapping to chromosome X. An SYT probe detected genomic rearrangements in 10/13 synovial sarcomas. Sequencing of cDNA clones shows that the normal SYT gene encodes a protein rich in glutamine, proline and glycine, and indicates that in synovial sarcoma rearrangement of the SYT gene results in the formation of an SYT-SSX fusion protein. Both SYT and SSX failed to exhibit significant homology to known gene sequences.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparing children and adults with synovial sarcoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, 1983 to 2005: an analysis of 1268 patients.

            Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a typical soft tissue sarcoma subtype crosswise between the pediatric and the adult age groups. Less satisfactory overall outcome has been recorded in adult series. This study compares clinical features and outcomes of SS across the different age groups, by analyzing 1268 cases, 213 children/adolescents (
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of SYT-SSX fusion type on the clinical behavior of synovial sarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 243 patients.

              Synovial sarcomas are aggressive spindle cell sarcomas containing in some cases areas of epithelial differentiation. They consistently show a specific t(X;18;p11;q11), which usually represents either of two gene fusions, SYT-SSX1 or SYT-SSX2, encoding putative transcriptional proteins differing at 13 amino acid positions. Previous studies have suggested that patients with SYT-SSX2 tumors do better than those with SYT-SSX1 tumors, but the study groups were too limited to be conclusive. To address this issue more definitively, we collected data on SYT-SSX fusion type, pathology, and clinical course in a retrospective multi-institutional study of 243 patients (age range, 6-82) with synovial sarcoma. SYT-SSX1 and SYT-SSX2 fusions were detected in 147 tumors (61%) and 91 tumors (37%), respectively. Histologically, 61 (25%) were classified as biphasic type and 180 (74%) as monophasic type based on the presence or absence of areas of glandular epithelial differentiation, respectively. Median and 5-year overall survivals for the SYT-SSX1 and SYT-SSX2 groups were 6.1 years and 53%, and 13.7 years and 73%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly better among SYT-SSX2 cases (P = 0.03), among cases localized at diagnosis (P < 0.0001), and among patients with primary tumors < 5 cm in greatest dimension (P = 0.01). Age, sex, histological type, and axial versus peripheral primary site had no impact on overall survival. The impact of fusion type on survival remained significant when stratified for primary tumor size (P = 0.03) but was no longer significant when stratified for disease status at presentation. This may reflect the tendency for patients with SYT-SSX1 tumors to present more often with metastatic disease (P = 0.05). Cox regression identified disease status (P < 0.0001) and primary tumor size (P = 0.04) as the only factors independently predictive of overall survival in the subset of 160 patients with information on all of the factors. Within the subset of patients with localized disease at diagnosis (n = 202), the median and 5-year survival for the SYT-SSX1 and the SYT-SSX2 groups were 9.2 years and 61% versus 13.7 years and 77%, respectively. Patients whose tumors contained the SYT-SSX2 fusion (P = 0.08) or were smaller (P = 0.12) showed a trend toward better survival by log-rank test, whereas tumor histology had no impact (P = 0.8). In a Cox regression analysis considering all of the factors, SYT-SSX fusion type emerged as the only independent significant factor (P = 0.04) for overall survival within the subset of 133 patients with localized disease at diagnosis who had information on all of the factors. Among other comparisons, there was a strong association of fusion type and morphology (P < 0.001), with almost all of the SYT-SSX2 tumors showing absence of glandular differentiation (monophasic histology) and almost all of the biphasic tumors containing SYT-SSX1. There was also a statistically significant association of fusion type and patient sex (P = 0.03); specifically, the male:female ratio of SYT-SSX1 cases was 1:1, whereas for SYT-SSX2 cases, it was close to 1:2. Overall, SYT-SSX fusion type appears to be the single most significant prognostic factor by multivariate analysis in patients with localized disease at diagnosis. SYT-SSX fusion type also appears to exert part of its impact on prognosis before presentation through its association with stage at diagnosis. In addition, the associations of SYT-SSX fusion type with patient sex and tumor epithelial differentiation point to interesting mechanistic biological differences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                higashi.tatsuya@qst.go.jp
                hasegawa.sumitaka@qst.go.jp
                Journal
                Cancer Sci
                Cancer Sci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1349-7006
                CAS
                Cancer Science
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1347-9032
                1349-7006
                27 June 2018
                July 2018
                : 109
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1111/cas.2018.109.issue-7 )
                : 2302-2309
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Radiation and Cancer Biology Team National Institute of Radiological Sciences National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology Chiba Japan
                [ 2 ] Graduate School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences Chiba University Chiba Japan
                [ 3 ] Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Tokyo Japan
                [ 4 ] Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics National Institute of Radiological Sciences National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology Chiba Japan
                [ 5 ] Targetry and Target Chemistry Team National Institute of Radiological Sciences National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology Chiba Japan
                [ 6 ] Department of Pathology The Cancer Institute of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan
                [ 7 ] OncoTherapy Science Inc. Kanagawa Japan
                [ 8 ] Department of Gastroenterological Surgery The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan
                [ 9 ] Division of Genome Medicine Institute for Genome Research Tokushima University Tokushima Japan
                [ 10 ] Department of Medicine The University of Chicago Chicago IL USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Sumitaka Hasegawa, Radiation and Cancer Biology Team, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.

                Email: hasegawa.sumitaka@ 123456qst.go.jp

                and

                Tatsuya Higashi, Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.

                Email: higashi.tatsuya@ 123456qst.go.jp

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-914X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-9759
                Article
                CAS13636
                10.1111/cas.13636
                6029834
                29952132
                b442b105-4219-4c55-aaa4-95452d43051d
                © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 05 February 2018
                : 17 April 2018
                : 02 May 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 8, Words: 5103
                Funding
                Funded by: JSPS KAKENHI
                Award ID: JP16H06276
                Funded by: National Institute of Radiological Sciences
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Drug Discovery and Delivery
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                cas13636
                July 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.4.1.1 mode:remove_FC converted:03.07.2018

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                α‐particle,β‐particle,frizzled homolog 10,radioimmunotherapy,synovial sarcoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article