21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      SUMOylation of human septins is critical for septin filament bundling and cytokinesis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Yeast septins were among the first proteins reported to be SUMOylated, but the impact of this modification on septin function is unclear. Ribet et al. show that septins are SUMOylated in humans and that SUMOylation is critical for septin bundle formation and septin function in cell division.

          Abstract

          Septins are cytoskeletal proteins that assemble into nonpolar filaments. They are critical in diverse cellular functions, acting as scaffolds for protein recruitment and as diffusion barriers for subcellular compartmentalization. Human septins are encoded by 13 different genes and are classified into four groups based on sequence homology (SEPT2, SEPT3, SEPT6, and SEPT7 groups). In yeast, septins were among the first proteins reported to be modified by SUMOylation, a ubiquitin-like posttranslational modification. However, whether human septins could be modified by small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMOs) and what roles this modification may have in septin function remains unknown. In this study, we first show that septins from all four human septin groups can be covalently modified by SUMOs. We show in particular that endogenous SEPT7 is constitutively SUMOylated during the cell cycle. We then map SUMOylation sites to the C-terminal domain of septins belonging to the SEPT6 and SEPT7 groups and to the N-terminal domain of septins from the SEPT3 group. We finally demonstrate that expression of non-SUMOylatable septin variants from the SEPT6 and SEPT7 groups leads to aberrant septin bundle formation and defects in cytokinesis after furrow ingression. Altogether, our results demonstrate a pivotal role for SUMOylation in septin filament bundling and cell division.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interaction of a Golgi-associated kinesin-like protein with Rab6.

          Rab guanosine triphosphatases regulate vesicular transport and membrane traffic within eukaryotic cells. Here, a kinesin-like protein that interacts with guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound forms of Rab6 was identified. This protein, termed Rabkinesin-6, was localized to the Golgi apparatus and shown to play a role in the dynamics of this organelle. The carboxyl-terminal domain of Rabkinesin-6, which contains the Rab6-interacting domain, inhibited the effects of Rab6-GTP on intracellular transport. Thus, a molecular motor is a potential effector of a Rab protein, and coordinated action between members of these two families of proteins could control membrane dynamics and directional vesicular traffic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genetic control of the cell-division cycle in yeast. I. Detection of mutants.

            Time-lapse photomicroscopy has been utilized to detect temperature-sensitive yeast mutants that are defective in gene functions needed at specific stages of the cell-division cycle. This technique provides two types of information about a mutant: the time at which the defective gene function is normally performed, defined as the execution point, and the stage at which cells collect when the function is not performed, defined as the termination point. Mutants carrying lesions in three genes that control the cell-division cycle are described. All three genes, cdc-1, cdc-2, and cdc-3, execute early in the cell cycle at about the time of bud initiation, but differ in their termination points. Cells carrying the cdc-1 mutation terminate at the execution point, most cells ending up with a tiny bud that does not develop further. Cells carrying the cdc-2 mutation terminate at mitosis. Cells carrying the cdc-3 mutation are defective in cell separation but show no definite termination point since other processes of the cell cycle, such as bud initiation and nuclear division, continue despite the block in cell separation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The septin family of GTPases: architecture and dynamics.

              Septins comprise a conserved family of proteins that are found primarily in fungi and animals. These GTP-binding proteins have several roles during cell division, cytoskeletal organization and membrane-remodelling events. One factor that is crucial for their functions is the ordered assembly of individual septins into oligomeric core complexes that, in turn, form higher-order structures such as filaments, rings and gauzes. The molecular details of these interactions and the mechanism by which septin-complex assembly is regulated have remained elusive. Recently, the first detailed structural views of the septin core have emerged, and these, along with studies of septin dynamics in vivo, have provided new insight into septin-complex assembly and septin function in vivo.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J. Cell Biol
                jcb
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                The Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                4 December 2017
                : 216
                : 12
                : 4041-4052
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unité des Interactions Bactéries-Cellules, Institut Pasteur, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, France
                [2 ]Unité de Trafic Membranaire et Division Cellulaire, Département de Biologie Cellulaire et Infection, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
                [3 ]Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR3691, Paris, France
                [4 ]Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Université Paris 06, Institut de Formation Doctorale, Paris, France
                [5 ]Medical Research Council Centre for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, Imperial College London, London, England, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Pascale Cossart: pascale.cossart@ 123456pasteur.fr ;
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1175-6471
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8871-6780
                Article
                201703096
                10.1083/jcb.201703096
                5716278
                29051266
                b3d88725-129f-4408-a2eb-05753264ba68
                © 2017 Ribet et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).

                History
                : 20 March 2017
                : 25 July 2017
                : 23 August 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Institut Pasteur, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003762;
                Funded by: Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001677;
                Funded by: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100006488;
                Funded by: French National Research Agency, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001665;
                Award ID: ERANET Infect-ERA PROANTILIS ANR-13-IFEC-0004-02
                Funded by: European Research Council, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100010663;
                Award ID: H2020-ERC-2014-ADG 670823-BacCellEpi
                Funded by: International Balzan Prize Foundation, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100008995;
                Funded by: Institut Pasteur, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003762;
                Funded by: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100004794;
                Funded by: Institut National du Cancer, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100006364;
                Award ID: 2014-1-PLBIO-04
                Funded by: ANR, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001665;
                Award ID: AbsCyStem 15-CE13-0001-02
                Award ID: CYTOSIGN 16-CE13-004-02
                Funded by: INSERM, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001677;
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100004440;
                Award ID: WT097411MA
                Funded by: Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001255;
                Funded by: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000011;
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Article
                10
                35
                21

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article