1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Treating Below-the-Knee Arteries in Critical Limb Ischemia: The SINGA-PACLI Trial.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background There is a paucity of randomized trials demonstrating superior efficacy of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) compared with conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for below-the-knee arterial disease in patients with -critical limb ischemia. Purpose To compare DCBA versus PTA for below-the-knee lesions in participants with critical limb ischemia through 12 months. Materials and Methods In this prospective, randomized, two-center, double-blind superiority study, participants with critical limb ischemia with rest pain or tissue loss with atherosclerotic disease in the native below-the-knee arteries were randomly assigned (in a one-to-one ratio) to DCBA or PTA after stratification for diabetes and renal failure between November 2013 and October 2017. The primary efficacy end point was angiographic primary patency at 6 months analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary end points through 12 months were composed of major adverse events including death and major amputations, wound healing, limb salvage, clinically driven target-lesion revascularization, and amputation-free survival. Primary and binary secondary end points, analyzed by using generalized-linear model and time-to-event analyses, were estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hazard ratios (Cox regression). Results Seventy participants (mean age, 61 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; 43 men) in the DCBA group and 68 (mean age, 64 years ± 10; 50 men) in the PTA group were evaluated. The percentage of patients with angiographic primary patency at 6 months was 43% (30 of 70) in the DCBA group and 38% (26 of 68) in the PTA group (P = .48). Through 12 months, the percentage of deaths was similar: 21% in the DCBA group and 16% in the PTA group (P = .43). Amputation-free survival rate assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves differed through 12 months: 59% (41 of 70) in the DCBA group compared with 78% (53 of 68) in the PTA group (P = .01). Conclusion In participants with critical limb ischemia, the drug-coated balloon angioplasty group and the conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group had similar primary patency rates at 6 months after treatment of below-the-knee arteries. Amputation-free survival rates through 12 months were higher in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Radiology
          Radiology
          Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
          1527-1315
          0033-8419
          September 2021
          : 300
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.).
          Article
          10.1148/radiol.2021204294
          34227886
          b3d41296-dd65-45e4-8a03-62a93185abab
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article