2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Omics approaches open new horizons in major depressive disorder: from biomarkers to precision medicine

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a recurrent episodic mood disorder that represents the third leading cause of disability worldwide. In MDD, several factors can simultaneously contribute to its development, which complicates its diagnosis. According to practical guidelines, antidepressants are the first-line treatment for moderate to severe major depressive episodes. Traditional treatment strategies often follow a one-size-fits-all approach, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for many patients who fail to experience a response or recovery and develop the so-called “therapy-resistant depression”. The high biological and clinical inter-variability within patients and the lack of robust biomarkers hinder the finding of specific therapeutic targets, contributing to the high treatment failure rates. In this frame, precision medicine, a paradigm that tailors medical interventions to individual characteristics, would help allocate the most adequate and effective treatment for each patient while minimizing its side effects. In particular, multi-omic studies may unveil the intricate interplays between genetic predispositions and exposure to environmental factors through the study of epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, gut microbiomics, and immunomics. The integration of the flow of multi-omic information into molecular pathways may produce better outcomes than the current psychopharmacological approach, which targets singular molecular factors mainly related to the monoamine systems, disregarding the complex network of our organism. The concept of system biomedicine involves the integration and analysis of enormous datasets generated with different technologies, creating a “patient fingerprint”, which defines the underlying biological mechanisms of every patient. This review, centered on precision medicine, explores the integration of multi-omic approaches as clinical tools for prediction in MDD at a single-patient level. It investigates how combining the existing technologies used for diagnostic, stratification, prognostic, and treatment-response biomarkers discovery with artificial intelligence can improve the assessment and treatment of MDD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references236

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis

          The importance of the gut-brain axis in maintaining homeostasis has long been appreciated. However, the past 15 yr have seen the emergence of the microbiota (the trillions of microorganisms within and on our bodies) as one of the key regulators of gut-brain function and has led to the appreciation of the importance of a distinct microbiota-gut-brain axis. This axis is gaining ever more traction in fields investigating the biological and physiological basis of psychiatric, neurodevelopmental, age-related, and neurodegenerative disorders. The microbiota and the brain communicate with each other via various routes including the immune system, tryptophan metabolism, the vagus nerve and the enteric nervous system, involving microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids, branched chain amino acids, and peptidoglycans. Many factors can influence microbiota composition in early life, including infection, mode of birth delivery, use of antibiotic medications, the nature of nutritional provision, environmental stressors, and host genetics. At the other extreme of life, microbial diversity diminishes with aging. Stress, in particular, can significantly impact the microbiota-gut-brain axis at all stages of life. Much recent work has implicated the gut microbiota in many conditions including autism, anxiety, obesity, schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. Animal models have been paramount in linking the regulation of fundamental neural processes, such as neurogenesis and myelination, to microbiome activation of microglia. Moreover, translational human studies are ongoing and will greatly enhance the field. Future studies will focus on understanding the mechanisms underlying the microbiota-gut-brain axis and attempt to elucidate microbial-based intervention and therapeutic strategies for neuropsychiatric disorders.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An inventory for measuring depression.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change

              The construction of a depression rating scale designed to be particularly sensitive to treatment effects is described. Ratings of 54 English and 52 Swedish patients on a 65 item comprehensive psychopathology scale were used to identify the 17 most commonly occurring symptoms in primary depressive illness in the combined sample. Ratings on these 17 items for 64 patients participating in studies of four different antidepressant drugs were used to create a depression scale consisting of the 10 items which showed the largest changes with treatment and the highest correlation to overall change. The inner-rater reliability of the new depression scale was high. Scores on the scale correlated significantly with scores on a standard rating scale for depression, the Hamilton Rating Scale (HRS), indicating its validity as a general severity estimate. Its capacity to differentiate between responders and non-responders to antidepressant treatment was better than the HRS, indicating greater sensitivity to change. The practical and ethical implications in terms of smaller sample sizes in clinical trials are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2759095Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2082547Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2753767Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2724889Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2003687Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/727209Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/550754Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/509014Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1519239Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                13 June 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1422939
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases (IRCAD), Università del Piemonte Orientale , Novara, Italy
                [2] 2 Center for Translational Research on Autoimmune and Allergic Disease (CAAD), Università del Piemonte Orientale , Novara, Italy
                [3] 3 Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin , Turin, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Yicheng Long, Central South University, China

                Reviewed by: Christoph Born, Klinikum am Weissenhof, Germany

                Gabriella Pietra, University of Genoa, Italy

                *Correspondence: Giuseppe Cappellano, giuseppe.cappellano@ 123456uniupo.it

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1422939
                11210496
                38938457
                b3c6d6c5-1be0-4e08-acd9-c28097eb4840
                Copyright © 2024 Stolfi, Abreu, Sinella, Nembrini, Centonze, Landra, Brasso, Cappellano, Rocca and Chiocchetti

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 24 April 2024
                : 28 May 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 237, Pages: 20, Words: 10273
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by CARIPLO (acronym MIND-ME) grant n. 2019_3277 to PR and AC; the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under Grant Agreement No. 953121, project FLAMIN-GO to AC.
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Review
                Custom metadata
                Psychopathology

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                major depressive disorder,precision medicine,system biomedicine,biomarkers,antidepressant

                Comments

                Comment on this article