Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of Noise and Serial Position on Free Recall of Spoken Words and Pupil Dilation during Encoding in Normal-Hearing Adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This preliminary study assessed the effects of noise and stimulus presentation order on recall of spoken words and recorded pupil sizes while normal-hearing listeners were trying to encode a series of words for a subsequent recall task. In three listening conditions (stationary noise in Experiment 1; quiet versus four-talker babble in Experiment 2), participants were assigned to remember as many words as possible to recall them in any order after each list of seven sentences. In the two noise conditions, lists of sentences fixed at 65 dB SPL were presented at an easily audible level via a loudspeaker. Reading span (RS) scores were used as a grouping variable, based on a median split. The primacy effect was present apart from the noise interference, and the high-RS group significantly outperformed the low-RS group at free recall measured in the quiet and four-talker babble noise conditions. RS scores were positively correlated with free-recall scores. In both quiet and four-talker babble noise conditions, sentence baselines after correction to the initial stimulus baseline increased significantly with increasing memory load. Larger sentence baselines but smaller peak pupil dilations seemed to be associated with noise interruption. The analysis method of pupil dilation used in this study is likely to provide a more thorough understanding of how listeners respond to a later recall task in comparison with previously used methods. Further studies are needed to confirm the applicability of our method in people with impaired hearing using multiple repetitions to estimate the allocation of relevant cognitive resources.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Working memory

          A Baddeley (1992)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Individual differences in working memory and reading

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

              H. Levitt (1971)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Brain Sci
                Brain Sci
                brainsci
                Brain Sciences
                MDPI
                2076-3425
                23 February 2021
                February 2021
                : 11
                : 2
                : 277
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea; misng9@ 123456gmail.com (M.K.); drmung@ 123456daum.net (M.S.); junlee@ 123456snu.ac.kr (J.L.); shaoh@ 123456snu.ac.kr (S.O.)
                [2 ]Yeongeon Medical Campus, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea; wlgml0720@ 123456snu.ac.kr (J.J.); hymun1372@ 123456snu.ac.kr (H.M.)
                [3 ]Sensory Organ Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul 03087, Korea
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: entpmk@ 123456gmail.com ; Tel.: +82-2-2072-2446
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9769-8860
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8635-797X
                Article
                brainsci-11-00277
                10.3390/brainsci11020277
                7926499
                33672410
                b3774610-9aa8-4d56-84f2-4107c32c2074
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 January 2021
                : 19 February 2021
                Categories
                Article

                working memory,listening effort,hearing in noise,free recall,pupillometry,cognitive demand,memory,reading span,baseline,serial position

                Comments

                Comment on this article