104
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    3
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gender inequality in organizations is a complex phenomenon that can be seen in organizational structures, processes, and practices. For women, some of the most harmful gender inequalities are enacted within human resources (HRs) practices. This is because HR practices (i.e., policies, decision-making, and their enactment) affect the hiring, training, pay, and promotion of women. We propose a model of gender discrimination in HR that emphasizes the reciprocal nature of gender inequalities within organizations. We suggest that gender discrimination in HR-related decision-making and in the enactment of HR practices stems from gender inequalities in broader organizational structures, processes, and practices. This includes leadership, structure, strategy, culture, organizational climate, as well as HR policies. In addition, organizational decision makers’ levels of sexism can affect their likelihood of making gender biased HR-related decisions and/or behaving in a sexist manner while enacting HR practices. Importantly, institutional discrimination in organizational structures, processes, and practices play a pre-eminent role because not only do they affect HR practices, they also provide a socializing context for organizational decision makers’ levels of hostile and benevolent sexism. Although we portray gender inequality as a self-reinforcing system that can perpetuate discrimination, important levers for reducing discrimination are identified.

          Related collections

          Most cited references240

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives.

              An integrative social identity model of collective action (SIMCA) is developed that incorporates 3 socio-psychological perspectives on collective action. Three meta-analyses synthesized a total of 182 effects of perceived injustice, efficacy, and identity on collective action (corresponding to these socio-psychological perspectives). Results showed that, in isolation, all 3 predictors had medium-sized (and causal) effects. Moreover, results showed the importance of social identity in predicting collective action by supporting SIMCA's key predictions that (a) affective injustice and politicized identity produced stronger effects than those of non-affective injustice and non-politicized identity; (b) identity predicted collective action against both incidental and structural disadvantages, whereas injustice and efficacy predicted collective action against incidental disadvantages better than against structural disadvantages; (c) all 3 predictors had unique medium-sized effects on collective action when controlling for between-predictor covariance; and (d) identity bridged the injustice and efficacy explanations of collective action. Results also showed more support for SIMCA than for alternative models reflecting previous attempts at theoretical integration. The authors discuss key implications for theory, practice, future research, and further integration of social and psychological perspectives on collective action. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                16 September 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 1400
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Frédérique Autin, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

                Reviewed by: Peggy Stockdale, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis, USA; Tina C. Elacqua, LeTourneau University, USA

                *Correspondence: Leanne S. Son Hing, Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada, sonhing@ 123456uoguelph.ca

                These authors have contributed equally to this work.

                This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400
                4584998
                26441775
                b3518d0b-fccb-4704-a907-ab602b2fc41d
                Copyright © 2015 Stamarski and Son Hing.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 January 2015
                : 02 September 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 247, Pages: 20, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                hostile sexism,benevolent sexism,institutional discrimination,human resources practices,gender harassment,personal discrimination

                Comments

                Comment on this article