Resilient Robot Teams: a Review Integrating Decentralised Control, Change-Detection, and Learning

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper reviews opportunities and challenges for decentralised control, change-detection, and learning in the context of resilient robot teams.

Recent Findings

Exogenous fault-detection methods can provide a generic detection or a specific diagnosis with a recovery solution. Robot teams can perform active and distributed sensing for detecting changes in the environment, including identifying and tracking dynamic anomalies, as well as collaboratively mapping dynamic environments. Resilient methods for decentralised control have been developed in learning perception-action-communication loops, multi-agent reinforcement learning, embodied evolution, offline evolution with online adaptation, explicit task allocation, and stigmergy in swarm robotics.

Summary

Remaining challenges for resilient robot teams are integrating change-detection and trial-and-error learning methods, obtaining reliable performance evaluations under constrained evaluation time, improving the safety of resilient robot teams, theoretical results demonstrating rapid adaptation to given environmental perturbations, and designing realistic and compelling case studies.

Related collections

Most cited references 63

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies.

Kenneth O. Stanley, Risto Miikkulainen (2002)

An important question in neuroevolution is how to gain an advantage from evolving neural network topologies along with weights. We present a method, NeuroEvolution of Augmenting Topologies (NEAT), which outperforms the best fixed-topology method on a challenging benchmark reinforcement learning task. We claim that the increased efficiency is due to (1) employing a principled method of crossover of different topologies, (2) protecting structural innovation using speciation, and (3) incrementally growing from minimal structure. We test this claim through a series of ablation studies that demonstrate that each component is necessary to the system as a whole and to each other. What results is significantly faster learning. NEAT is also an important contribution to GAs because it shows how it is possible for evolution to both optimize and complexify solutions simultaneously, offering the possibility of evolving increasingly complex solutions over generations, and strengthening the analogy with biological evolution.