9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: PULSED AF Pivotal Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Background:

          Pulsed field ablation uses electrical pulses to cause nonthermal irreversible electroporation and induce cardiac cell death. Pulsed field ablation may have effectiveness comparable to traditional catheter ablation while preventing thermally mediated complications.

          Methods:

          The PULSED AF pivotal study (Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF) was a prospective, global, multicenter, nonrandomized, paired single-arm study in which patients with paroxysmal (n=150) or persistent (n=150) symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs were treated with pulsed field ablation. All patients were monitored for 1 year using weekly and symptomatic transtelephonic monitoring; 3-, 6-, and 12-month ECGs; and 6- and 12-month 24-hour Holter monitoring. The primary effectiveness end point was freedom from a composite of acute procedural failure, arrhythmia recurrence, or antiarrhythmic escalation through 12 months, excluding a 3-month blanking period to allow recovery from the procedure. The primary safety end point was freedom from a composite of serious procedure- and device-related adverse events. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate the primary end points.

          Results:

          Pulsed field ablation was shown to be effective at 1 year in 66.2% (95% CI, 57.9 to 73.2) of patients with paroxysmal AF and 55.1% (95% CI, 46.7 to 62.7) of patients with persistent AF. The primary safety end point occurred in 1 patient (0.7%; 95% CI, 0.1 to 4.6) in both the paroxysmal and persistent AF cohorts.

          Conclusions:

          PULSED AF demonstrated a low rate of primary safety adverse events (0.7%) and provided effectiveness consistent with established ablation technologies using a novel irreversible electroporation energy to treat patients with AF.

          Registration:

          URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04198701.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          OUP accepted manuscript

          (2020)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

            Catheter ablation is less successful for persistent atrial fibrillation than for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Guidelines suggest that adjuvant substrate modification in addition to pulmonary-vein isolation is required in persistent atrial fibrillation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

              Current guidelines recommend pulmonary-vein isolation by means of catheter ablation as treatment for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation is the most common method, and cryoballoon ablation is the second most frequently used technology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Circulation
                Circulation
                CIR
                Circulation
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0009-7322
                1524-4539
                06 March 2023
                09 May 2023
                : 147
                : 19
                : 1422-1432
                Affiliations
                [1]McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (A.V.).
                [2]Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI (D.E.H.).
                [3]St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands (L.V.B.).
                [4]Southcoast Health Center, Fall River, MA (N.S.).
                [5]Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin (A.N.).
                [6]Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (F.E.M.).
                [7]Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (H.C.).
                [8]University of Adelaide & Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia (P.S.).
                [9]Mayo Clinic–St. Mary’s Hospital, Rochester, MN (D.L.P.).
                [10]LANS Cardio, Hamburg, Germany (K.-H.K.).
                [11]Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Germany (G.H.).
                [12]Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN (B.O., J.C.).
                [13]University of Fukui, Japan (H.T.).
                [14]Emory Heart & Vascular Center at St. Joseph’s, Atlanta, GA (D.B.D.).
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Atul Verma, MD, Division of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, D13.173, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4 Canada. Email atul.verma@ 123456mcgill.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1020-9727
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-4220
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5487-0728
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7962-9423
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9262-9433
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-8429
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-869X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2649-3870
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8961-8939
                Article
                00002
                10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.063988
                10158608
                36877118
                b311264f-eba6-47b0-b565-454829a7f3b5
                © 2023 The Authors.

                Circulation is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 14 January 2023
                : 7 February 2023
                Categories
                10002
                10004
                Original Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                CME
                T

                atrial fibrillation,catheter ablation,clinical trial,electroporation,pulsed field ablation

                Comments

                Comment on this article