20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of renal denervation on kidney function and long-term outcomes: 3-year follow-up from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Several studies and registries have demonstrated sustained reductions in blood pressure (BP) after renal denervation (RDN). The long-term safety and efficacy after RDN in real-world patients with uncontrolled hypertension, however, remains unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of RDN, including its effects on renal function.

          Methods and results

          The Global SYMPLICITY Registry is a prospective, open-label registry conducted at 196 active sites worldwide in hypertensive patients receiving RDN treatment. Among 2237 patients enrolled and treated with the SYMPLICITY Flex catheter, 1742 were eligible for follow-up at 3 years. Baseline office and 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) were 166 ± 25 and 154 ± 18 mmHg, respectively. SBP reduction after RDN was sustained over 3 years, including decreases in both office (−16.5 ± 28.6 mmHg, P < 0.001) and 24-h ambulatory SBP (−8.0 ± 20.0 mmHg; P < 0.001). Twenty-one percent of patients had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2. Between baseline and 3 years, renal function declined by 7.1 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in patients without chronic kidney disease (CKD; eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2; baseline eGFR 87 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m 2) and by 3.7 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in patients with CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2; baseline eGFR 47 ± 11 mL/min/1.73 m 2). No long-term safety concerns were observed following the RDN procedure.

          Conclusion

          Long-term data from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry representing the largest available cohort of hypertensive patients receiving RDN in a real-world clinical setting demonstrate both the safety and efficacy of the procedure with significant and sustained office and ambulatory BP reductions out to 3 years.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.

          Equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are routinely used to assess kidney function. Current equations have limited precision and systematically underestimate measured GFR at higher values. To develop a new estimating equation for GFR: the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Cross-sectional analysis with separate pooled data sets for equation development and validation and a representative sample of the U.S. population for prevalence estimates. Research studies and clinical populations ("studies") with measured GFR and NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), 1999 to 2006. 8254 participants in 10 studies (equation development data set) and 3896 participants in 16 studies (validation data set). Prevalence estimates were based on 16,032 participants in NHANES. GFR, measured as the clearance of exogenous filtration markers (iothalamate in the development data set; iothalamate and other markers in the validation data set), and linear regression to estimate the logarithm of measured GFR from standardized creatinine levels, sex, race, and age. In the validation data set, the CKD-EPI equation performed better than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation, especially at higher GFR (P < 0.001 for all subsequent comparisons), with less bias (median difference between measured and estimated GFR, 2.5 vs. 5.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), improved precision (interquartile range [IQR] of the differences, 16.6 vs. 18.3 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), and greater accuracy (percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR, 84.1% vs. 80.6%). In NHANES, the median estimated GFR was 94.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (IQR, 79.7 to 108.1) vs. 85.0 (IQR, 72.9 to 98.5) mL/min per 1.73 m(2), and the prevalence of chronic kidney disease was 11.5% (95% CI, 10.6% to 12.4%) versus 13.1% (CI, 12.1% to 14.0%). The sample contained a limited number of elderly people and racial and ethnic minorities with measured GFR. The CKD-EPI creatinine equation is more accurate than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation and could replace it for routine clinical use. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization.

              End-stage renal disease substantially increases the risks of death, cardiovascular disease, and use of specialized health care, but the effects of less severe kidney dysfunction on these outcomes are less well defined. We estimated the longitudinal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among 1,120,295 adults within a large, integrated system of health care delivery in whom serum creatinine had been measured between 1996 and 2000 and who had not undergone dialysis or kidney transplantation. We examined the multivariable association between the estimated GFR and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. The median follow-up was 2.84 years, the mean age was 52 years, and 55 percent of the group were women. After adjustment, the risk of death increased as the GFR decreased below 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area: the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.2 with an estimated GFR of 45 to 59 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.2), 1.8 with an estimated GFR of 30 to 44 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 1.9), 3.2 with an estimated GFR of 15 to 29 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 (95 percent confidence interval, 3.1 to 3.4), and 5.9 with an estimated GFR of less than 15 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 (95 percent confidence interval, 5.4 to 6.5). The adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular events also increased inversely with the estimated GFR: 1.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 1.5), 2.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 2.1), 2.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.6 to 2.9), and 3.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 3.1 to 3.8), respectively. The adjusted risk of hospitalization with a reduced estimated GFR followed a similar pattern. An independent, graded association was observed between a reduced estimated GFR and the risk of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization in a large, community-based population. These findings highlight the clinical and public health importance of chronic renal insufficiency. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Heart J
                Eur. Heart J
                eurheartj
                European Heart Journal
                Oxford University Press
                0195-668X
                1522-9645
                01 November 2019
                25 March 2019
                25 March 2019
                : 40
                : 42 , Focus Issue on Hypertension
                : 3474-3482
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Saarland University Hospital , Geb. 41, Kirrberger Strasse 1, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
                [2 ] Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen , Maximilianspl. 2, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
                [3 ] Department of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk , Marii Skłodowska-Curie 3a, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
                [4 ] Department of Cardiovascular Risk, Hypertension Unit and Cardiorenal Translational Research Laboratory, Institute of Research i + 12, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and CIBERCV, School of Doctoral Studies and Research, Universidad Europea de Madrid , Av. Cordoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain
                [5 ] Department of Medicine, Dobney Hypertension Centre, School of Medicine–Royal Perth Hospital Unit, The University of Western Australia , 197 Wellington St, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
                [6 ] Department of Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, National Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals, Biomedical Research Centre , Gower St, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                [7 ] Coronary and Structural Heart Divisio n, Medtronic PLC, 3576 Unocal Place, Santa Rosa, CA 95403, USA
                [8 ] Professor Emeritus, University of Milano-Bicocca , P.za dei Daini, 4 - 20126 Milano, Italy
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. Tel: +49 6841 16 15911, Fax: +49 6841 16 15910, Email: Felix.Mahfoud@ 123456uks.eu
                Article
                ehz118
                10.1093/eurheartj/ehz118
                6837160
                30907413
                b2ea1a25-994d-417a-9e2b-9c4ad906b5b5
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 02 September 2018
                : 1 November 2018
                : 20 February 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: Medtronic 10.13039/100004374
                Funded by: Deutsche Hochdruckliga, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659
                Award ID: SFB TRR 219
                Categories
                Clinical Research
                Hypertension
                Editor's Choice

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                denervation,hypertension,renal function,ambulatory blood pressure monitoring,symplicity

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content376

                Cited by90

                Most referenced authors1,840