0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Study on the Effects of Heterogeneous Distribution of Methane Hydrate on Permeability of Porous Media Using Low‐Field NMR Technique

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The permeability of sediments is an important parameter that effects flow characteristics of the gas and water in the process of natural gas hydrates development. The distribution of gas hydrate is generally heterogeneous in porous media. It poses a great challenge to the permeability measurement of hydrate‐bearing sediments. To study the effect of heterogeneous distribution of methane hydrate on the permeability of porous media, methane hydrate formation in the sandstone and permeability measurement was carried out using a low‐field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurement system in situ conditions. The spatial distribution of methane hydrate in the core samples was determined by combining the T 2 distribution with magnetic resonance imaging. The results show that the distribution of methane hydrate is heterogeneous in the core samples. The temporal and spatial variation of permeability happens in the process of hydrate dissociation. The heterogeneity of methane hydrate distribution severely affects the analysis of permeability change. Considering the heterogeneity of methane hydrate distribution, a new method was proposed to obtain the quantitative relationship between hydrate saturation and relative permeability based on magnetic resonance imaging and the equivalent seepage capacity method. The results show that the relative permeability models obtained by this method agree better with experimental results. The optimum coefficients of relative permeability models obtained by equivalent seepage capacity method change significantly in contrast with the direct fitting method. The variation of the optimum coefficient is up to 300% in this study. The model coefficients are related to the pore characteristic of hydrate‐free porous media.

          Key Points

          • The temporal and spatial variation of permeability is observed by combining the T 2 distribution with magnetic resonance imaging

          • Based on magnetic resonance imaging and equivalent seepage capacity method, a new method is proposed to calculate permeability

          • Coefficients of relative permeability models are related to pore characteristic of hydrate‐free sediments

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Deep sea NMR: Methane hydrate growth habit in porous media and its relationship to hydraulic permeability, deposit accumulation, and submarine slope stability

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Iġnik Sikumi Field Experiment, Alaska North Slope: Design, Operations, and Implications for CO2–CH4 Exchange in Gas Hydrate Reservoirs

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Production behavior and numerical analysis for 2017 methane hydrate extraction test of Shenhu, South China Sea

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
                JGR Solid Earth
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                2169-9313
                2169-9356
                February 2020
                February 15 2020
                February 2020
                : 125
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil and Gas Development (China University of Petroleum (East China)), Ministry of Education Qingdao China
                [2 ] Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology Qingdao China
                [3 ] School of Petroleum Engineering China University of Petroleum (East China) Qingdao China
                Article
                10.1029/2019JB018572
                b2c22fa8-61aa-493a-a0a6-20ce38df9ca6
                © 2020

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article