3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Early COVID‐19 Vaccine Initiation and Completion Among Cancer Survivors and Barriers to Vaccine Completion: Implications for Future COVID‐19 Vaccination Uptake Rates

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Purpose

          Cancer survivors are considered by public health officials as a high‐risk group in the United States for severe complications from COVID‐19. We aimed to characterize patterns of early uptake of the COVID‐19 vaccine among cancer survivors and to determine modifiable barriers to vaccine completion that can be addressed to ensure future booster adherence.

          Methods

          Cross‐sectional data of vaccine uptake by summer 2021 was extracted from adult cancer survivors enrolled in the “All of Us” research program. Vaccine completion was determined based on receiving at least two doses. We assessed sociodemographic factors, socioeconomic barriers (education, income, health insurance status, housing, and employment status), and COVID‐19 vaccine uptake by Summer 2021, employing multivariable ordinal logistic regression for those who were unvaccinated, had initiated vaccine uptake, and had completed COVID‐19 vaccination.

          Results

          Of the 514 cancer survivors in the sample, 73.7% were fully vaccinated by summer 2021. Those who received no vaccine doses showed higher proportions of SES barriers, medical distrust, and perceived lack of need barriers. Race (non‐Hispanic White vs. other) was not statistically significantly associated with vaccine uptake (OR (95% CI) = 0.94 (0.51, 1.70)), while for every additional SES barrier, there was a 40% decrease (OR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.48, 0.75)) in the odds of receiving more COVID‐19 vaccine doses. Higher medical distrust and perceived lack of need were associated with 56% (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.32–0.59) and 39% (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43–0.87) lower odds, respectively.

          Conclusion

          Racial/ethnic disparities in vaccine uptake may be explained by SES barriers. Addressing SES disparities and fostering medical trust may enhance future COVID‐19 vaccination uptake rates for this high‐risk group.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations

          An effective rollout of vaccinations against COVID-19 offers the most promising prospect of bringing the pandemic to an end. We present the Our World in Data COVID-19 vaccination dataset, a global public dataset that tracks the scale and rate of the vaccine rollout across the world. This dataset is updated regularly and includes data on the total number of vaccinations administered, first and second doses administered, daily vaccination rates and population-adjusted coverage for all countries for which data are available (169 countries as of 7 April 2021). It will be maintained as the global vaccination campaign continues to progress. This resource aids policymakers and researchers in understanding the rate of current and potential vaccine rollout; the interactions with non-vaccination policy responses; the potential impact of vaccinations on pandemic outcomes such as transmission, morbidity and mortality; and global inequalities in vaccine access.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            COVID-19 Related Medical Mistrust, Health Impacts, and Potential Vaccine Hesitancy Among Black Americans Living With HIV

            Background: Medical mistrust, a result of systemic racism, is prevalent among Black Americans and may play a role in COVID-19 inequities. In a convenience sample of HIV-positive Black Americans, we examined associations of COVID-19-related medical mistrust with COVID-19 vaccine and COVID-19 treatment hesitancy and negative impacts of COVID-19 on antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. Methods: Participants were 101 HIV-positive Black Americans (age: M = 50.3 years; SD = 11.5; 86% cisgender men; 77% sexual minority) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a community-based ART adherence intervention in Los Angeles County, CA. From May to July 2020, participants completed telephone interviews on negative COVID-19 impacts, general COVID-19 mistrust (eg, about the government withholding information), COVID-19 vaccine and treatment hesitancy, and trust in COVID-19 information sources. Adherence was monitored electronically with the Medication Event Monitoring System. Results: Nearly all participants (97%) endorsed at least one general COVID-19 mistrust belief, and more than half endorsed at least one COVID-19 vaccine or treatment hesitancy belief. Social service and health care providers were the most trusted sources. Greater COVID-19 mistrust was related to greater vaccine and treatment hesitancy [b (SE) = 0.85 (0.14), P < 0.0001 and b (SE) = 0.88 (0.14), P < 0.0001, respectively]. Participants experiencing more negative COVID-19 impacts showed lower ART adherence, assessed among a subset of 49 participants [b (SE) = −5.19 (2.08), P = 0.02]. Discussion: To prevent widening health inequities, health care providers should engage with communities to tailor strategies to overcome mistrust and deliver evidence-based information, to encourage COVID-19 vaccine and treatment uptake.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Factors Associated With Racial/Ethnic Group–Based Medical Mistrust and Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Participation and Vaccine Uptake in the US

              This survey study of adults residing in Michigan during June to December 2020 examines associations between race/ethnicity, medical mistrust within racial/ethnic groups, and willingness to participate in COVID-19 vaccine trials or to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Question Is there an association between race/ethnicity and rejection of COVID-19 vaccine trial participation and vaccine uptake in the US, and does racial/ethnic group–based medical mistrust mediate this association? Findings In this survey study of 1835 adults in Michigan, Black participants reported the greatest medical mistrust among the racial/ethnic groups surveyed. Analysis of path models revealed significantly greater COVID-19 vaccine trial and uptake rejection among Black participants, which was partially mediated by medical mistrust. Meaning The findings suggest that racial/ethnic group–based medical mistrust may partially explain the association between Black race/ethnicity and rejection of COVID-19 vaccine trial participation and uptake, potentially informing socially and culturally responsive efforts to promote COVID-19 vaccination in this group. Importance The impact of COVID-19 in the US has been far-reaching and devastating, especially in Black populations. Vaccination is a critical part of controlling community spread, but vaccine acceptance has varied, with some research reporting that Black individuals in the US are less willing to be vaccinated than other racial/ethnic groups. Medical mistrust informed by experiences of racism may be associated with this lower willingness. Objective To examine the association between race/ethnicity and rejection of COVID-19 vaccine trial participation and vaccine uptake and to investigate whether racial/ethnic group–based medical mistrust is a potential mediator of this association. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional survey study was conducted from June to December 2020 using a convenience sample of 1835 adults aged 18 years or older residing in Michigan. Participants were recruited through community-based organizations and hospital-academic networks. Main Outcomes and Measures Separate items assessed whether respondents, if asked, would agree to participate in a research study to test a COVID-19 vaccine or to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Participants also completed the suspicion subscale of the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale. Results Of the 1835 participants, 1455 (79%) were women, 361 (20%) men, and 19 (1%) other gender. The mean (SD) age was 49.4 (17.9) years, and 394 participants (21%) identified as Black individuals. Overall, 1376 participants (75%) reported low willingness to participate in vaccine trials, and 945 (52%) reported low willingness to be vaccinated. Black participants reported the highest medical mistrust scores (mean [SD], 2.35 [0.96]) compared with other racial/ethnic groups (mean [SD] for the total sample, 1.83 [0.91]). Analysis of path models revealed significantly greater vaccine trial and vaccine uptake rejection among Black participants (vaccine trial : B [SE], 0.51 [0.08]; vaccine uptake: B [SE], 0.51 [0.08]; both P  < .001) compared with the overall mean rejection. The association was partially mediated by medical mistrust among Black participants (vaccine trial: B [SE], 0.04 [0.01]; P  = .003; vaccine uptake: B [SE], 0.07 [0.02]; P  < .001) and White participants (vaccine trial: B [SE], −0.06 [0.02]; P  = .001; vaccine uptake: B [SE], −0.10 [0.02]; P  < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this survey study of US adults, racial/ethnic group–based medical mistrust partially mediated the association between individuals identifying as Black and low rates of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine trial participation and actual vaccination. The findings suggest that partnerships between health care and other sectors to build trust and promote vaccination may benefit from socially and culturally responsive strategies that acknowledge and address racial/ethnic health care disparities and historical and contemporary experiences of racism.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                albertfa@usc.edu
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                25 November 2024
                November 2024
                : 13
                : 22 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.v13.22 )
                : e70428
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Population and Public Health Sciences Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
                [ 2 ] Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
                [ 3 ] USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Los Angeles California USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence:

                Albert J. Farias ( albertfa@ 123456usc.edu )

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4327-1828
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4075-2675
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-5142
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6463-7831
                Article
                CAM470428 CAM4-2024-08-4428.R1
                10.1002/cam4.70428
                11586861
                39584661
                b2b4e980-1798-42d0-8959-65abf6d7ef1b
                © 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 October 2024
                : 06 August 2024
                : 04 November 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Pages: 8, Words: 6400
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health Office of the Director
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD025276
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD025277
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD025337
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD026548
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD026549
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD026550
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD026551
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD026552
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD026553
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD026554
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD026555
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD026556
                Award ID: 1 OT2 OD026557
                Award ID: 1 UT4 OD023121
                Award ID: 1 UT4 OD023163
                Award ID: 3 OT025315
                Award ID: 3 OT2 OD023205
                Award ID: 3 OT2 OD023206
                Award ID: 5 UTC OD023196
                Award ID: HHSN 263201600085U
                Award ID: IAA #: AOD 16307
                Award ID: U24 OD023176
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.5.1 mode:remove_FC converted:25.11.2024

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                all of us,cancer survivorship,covid‐19 vaccine
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                all of us, cancer survivorship, covid‐19 vaccine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content58

                Most referenced authors331