5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical valve thrombosis and subclinical leaflet thrombosis in transcatheter aortic heart valves: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          During the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has rapidly expanded as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and increased surgical risk. In TAVR, a bioprosthetic valve is positioned within the stenotic native aortic valve. Although favorable short- and medium-term outcomes have been reported, thrombosis of the transcatheter heart valve (THV) has occurred, with two different entities being described: clinical valve thrombosis and subclinical leaflet thrombosis. In clinical valve thrombosis, an increase in transvalvular gradient appears as a result of obstructive thrombus formation, which eventually leads to symptoms of heart failure. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis is an incidental finding, characterized by a thin layer of thrombus covering the aortic site of the leaflet—called hypo-attenuating leaflet thickening (HALT)—as described on and defined by 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) imaging. This phenomenon may affect motion of the leaflets and is then classified as hypo-attenuation affecting motion (HAM). Even in the case of HAM, the transvalvular pressure gradient remains within the normal range. Clinical valve thrombosis requires treatment, whereas the clinical impact and need for intervention in subclinical leaflet thrombosis is uncertain. Anticoagulant therapy protects against and resolves both clinical valve thrombosis and subclinical leaflet thrombosis, but studies exploring different antithrombotic strategies after TAVR are ongoing. This review summarizes currently available literature within the field of THV thrombosis and provides recommendations for a patient-tailored approach in TAVR patients, although guidelines are still lacking.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.

            Previous trials have shown that among high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, survival rates are similar with transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic-valve replacement. We evaluated the two procedures in a randomized trial involving intermediate-risk patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.

              Many patients with severe aortic stenosis and coexisting conditions are not candidates for surgical replacement of the aortic valve. Recently, transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) has been suggested as a less invasive treatment for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. We randomly assigned patients with severe aortic stenosis, whom surgeons considered not to be suitable candidates for surgery, to standard therapy (including balloon aortic valvuloplasty) or transfemoral transcatheter implantation of a balloon-expandable bovine pericardial valve. The primary end point was the rate of death from any cause. A total of 358 patients with aortic stenosis who were not considered to be suitable candidates for surgery underwent randomization at 21 centers (17 in the United States). At 1 year, the rate of death from any cause (Kaplan–Meier analysis) was 30.7% with TAVI, as compared with 50.7% with standard therapy (hazard ratio with TAVI, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.74; P<0.001). The rate of the composite end point of death from any cause or repeat hospitalization was 42.5% with TAVI as compared with 71.6% with standard therapy (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.59; P<0.001). Among survivors at 1 year, the rate of cardiac symptoms (New York Heart Association class III or IV) was lower among patients who had undergone TAVI than among those who had received standard therapy (25.2% vs. 58.0%, P<0.001). At 30 days, TAVI, as compared with standard therapy, was associated with a higher incidence of major strokes (5.0% vs. 1.1%, P=0.06) and major vascular complications (16.2% vs. 1.1%, P<0.001). In the year after TAVI, there was no deterioration in the functioning of the bioprosthetic valve, as assessed by evidence of stenosis or regurgitation on an echocardiogram. In patients with severe aortic stenosis who were not suitable candidates for surgery, TAVI, as compared with standard therapy, significantly reduced the rates of death from any cause, the composite end point of death from any cause or repeat hospitalization, and cardiac symptoms, despite the higher incidence of major strokes and major vascular events. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00530894.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Precis Clin Med
                Precis Clin Med
                pcm
                Precision Clinical Medicine
                Oxford University Press
                2096-5303
                2516-1571
                December 2018
                05 December 2018
                05 December 2018
                : 1
                : 3
                : 111-117
                Affiliations
                The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Liesbeth Rosseel, liesrosseel@ 123456outlook.com ; Lars Søndergaard, lars.soendergaard.01@ 123456regionh.dk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3940-3072
                Article
                pby016
                10.1093/pcmedi/pby016
                8985807
                b28302a9-7274-4484-89ba-b21e6974e1b0
                © The Author(s) [2018]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of West China School of Medicine & West China Hospital of Sichuan University.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@ 123456oup.com

                History
                : 30 August 2018
                : 24 October 2018
                : 01 November 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Categories
                Review

                tavr,subclinical leaflet thrombosis,clinical valve thrombosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article